NURS 6051 THE IMPACT OF NURSING INFORMATICS ON PATIENT OUTCOMES AND PATIENT CARE EFFICIENCIES

NURS 6051 THE IMPACT OF NURSING INFORMATICS ON PATIENT OUTCOMES AND PATIENT CARE EFFICIENCIES

Sample Answer for NURS 6051 THE IMPACT OF NURSING INFORMATICS ON PATIENT OUTCOMES AND PATIENT CARE EFFICIENCIES Included After Question

In the Discussion for this module, you considered the interaction of nurse informaticists with other specialists to ensure successful care. How is that success determined?

Patient outcomes and the fulfillment of care goals is one of the major ways that healthcare success is measured. Measuring patient outcomes results in the generation of data that can be used to improve results. Nursing informatics can have a significant part in this process and can help to improve outcomes by improving processes, identifying at-risk patients, and enhancing efficiency.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare:

  • Review the concepts of technology application as presented in the Resources.
  • Reflect on how emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence may help fortify nursing informatics as a specialty by leading to increased impact on patient outcomes or patient care efficiencies.

The Assignment: (4-5 pages not including the title and reference page)

In a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient-care efficiency. Your project proposal should include the following:

  • Describe the project you propose.
  • Identify the stakeholders impacted by this project.
  • Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this project is aimed at improving and explain how this improvement would occur. Be specific and provide examples.
  • Identify the technologies required to implement this project and explain why.
  • Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you would incorporate the nurse informatics in the project team.

    NURS 6051 THE IMPACT OF NURSING INFORMATICS ON PATIENT OUTCOMES AND PATIENT CARE EFFICIENCIES
    NURS 6051 THE IMPACT OF NURSING INFORMATICS ON PATIENT OUTCOMES AND PATIENT CARE EFFICIENCIES
  • Use APA format and include a title page and reference page.
  • Use the Safe Assign Drafts to check your match percentage before submitting your work.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 6051 THE IMPACT OF NURSING INFORMATICS ON PATIENT OUTCOMES AND PATIENT CARE EFFICIENCIES

Title: NURS 6051 THE IMPACT OF NURSING INFORMATICS ON PATIENT OUTCOMES AND PATIENT CARE EFFICIENCIES

Scenario

Mary, 23 years old of North Carolina, decided to pursue a career in Engineering. Mary has a good relationship with her grandmother, Esther, so she decided to go to school in Maryland. She lived on campus and called her grandmother every day. Mary anxiously looked forward to spending the weekend with her grandmother. One weekend she arrived at the house and found her grandmother on the floor. “Grandma!”  she exclaimed in a frightened voice. What happened? “Shut up and help me up this instant!” Mary was shocked by her grandmother’s reply. She ignored her and asked her again how she fell. “If you must know, deer were walking around the house.” Grandma, deer? “Yes, they were everywhere, you stupid girl,” “Grandma, you seem agitated and confused,” She convinced her grandmother to go to the doctor to check for broken bones or fractures due to the fall.

Data, Knowledge, and Reasoning

Mary explained how her sweet, kind grandmother suddenly changed her behavior and was confused. The clinician’s knowledge of how the elderly respond to infection and the given data led the clinical leader to ask Ms. Esther to provide a urine specimen and a urine culture. “The urine will be looked at in a lab to check for white blood cells, red blood cells, or bacteria”(Mayo Clinic, 2021). “The urine culture test tells your provider what bacteria are causing the infection. It can let your provider know which medications will be most effective”(Mayo Clinic, 2021). Nurse leaders use clinical reasoning and judgment to form knowledge that Ms. Esther had an infection. The clinical leader understands that it is crucial to take note of any changes in the elderly’s prior status because they typically do not exhibit typical indications of infection as the younger population (Alpay et al., 2018). Ms. Esther was diagnosed with a UTI infection and was prescribed antibiotics. She quickly recovered and returned to her sweet persona. “Technology continues to shift the nursing field in many ways, with the pace of change expected to increase with time” (Bailey, 2020). Nursing technology has saved many lives and improved patient care and outcomes.

 

Reference

Alpay, Y., Aykın, N., Korkmaz, P., Güldüren, H. M., & Çevik Çağlan, F. (2018). Urinary tract infections in the geriatric patients. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences34(1). https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.341.14013

Bailey, S. (2020, June 3). How Technology Has Changed the Role of Nursing. NurseJournal. https://nursejournal.org/articles/technology-changing-nursing-roles/

Mayo Clinic. (2021, April 23). Urinary tract infection (UTI) – Diagnosis and treatment – Mayo Clinic. Mayoclinic.org. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/urinary-tract-infection/diagnosis-treatment/drc-20353453

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NURS 6051 THE IMPACT OF NURSING INFORMATICS ON PATIENT OUTCOMES AND PATIENT CARE EFFICIENCIES

Title: NURS 6051 THE IMPACT OF NURSING INFORMATICS ON PATIENT OUTCOMES AND PATIENT CARE EFFICIENCIES

As a fellow travelling nurse, I completely agree with your statement self motivation and adaptability is also a key factor when it comes to technology use. Nurses must work with informatics and technology specialists to establish a seamless service delivery process to promote outstanding service quality (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2017). For example, when a patient enters the medical facility, a receptionist who is also an expert in medical records welcomes them and gives them directions on where to go after gathering their information. After that, the patient is sent to triage, which is the most crucial stage because a nurse’s examination will reveal various issues.

During triage, medical devices are used to obtain blood pressure, BMI, and sugar levels. If the system is automated, the results will be sent immediately to the on-call physician or entered into the patient’s file. After examining the patient, the attending physician or clinical officer recommends medicine, more testing, or ward admission. The systems that enable bedside nurses to transcribe these data electronically are usually the works of Nurse Informatics. This is typically the daily pattern that patients follow, necessitating the nurse and other experts’ participation to provide services properly. Nursing is a collaborating field in healthcare. Achieving patient desired outcomes requires multiple disciplines to combine effort and skill set.
Technology plays a role in planning how these interactions might be improved. Its practical use may speed up processes and prevent unnecessary delays that can raise expenses or even cause fatalities (Macieria et al., 2017).

The smooth delivery of services, patient and healthcare professional satisfaction, and cost savings will all increase due to efficient online transit of patient information from admission to triage to the doctor’s office. With the further development of nursing informatics as a specialty, the future of nursing appears to be brighter as the majority of manual tasks are eliminated and collaborative interactions are expanded, resulting in more excellent quality, more productivity, and, eventually, cost reduction (Wang, Kung & Byrd, 2018). Technology advancements will enable processes to be completed in the shortest amount of time while retaining the required level of quality, resulting in an overall increase in service delivery inside health institutions. Professional engagement will reach a new level.

A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NURS 6051 THE IMPACT OF NURSING INFORMATICS ON PATIENT OUTCOMES AND PATIENT CARE EFFICIENCIES

Title: NURS 6051 THE IMPACT OF NURSING INFORMATICS ON PATIENT OUTCOMES AND PATIENT CARE EFFICIENCIES

Nursing informatics is today a core aspect of nursing professional activities and processes. In their paper, Al Najjar et al. (2022) assert that nursing informatics reinforces nursing through the provision of standard language systems, decision-making support, improved application of technology, and better interactions among patients and clinical professionals. The purpose of this paper is to propose an informatics program or initiative to the organizational leadership to improve patient outcomes and patient care efficiencies in the facility as well as patient care experience.

Description of the Proposed Project

The need to improve care provision implores nurses to consider a host of approaches leveraging technologies in their practice settings. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in nursing is still relatively low yet it can offer increased benefits in improving efficiencies in patient care and outcomes. An important part of AI for nursing is predictive analytics which allows nurses to discover previously unknown patterns in different sources of clinical and operational data that can help them make better decisions (Booth et al., 2021). Using predictive analytics can help nurses to attain actionable insights that lead to greater accuracy, and timely yet appropriate interventions in a prescriptive manner for both patients and operational efficiencies.

In this case, the proposed project is syndromic surveillance that leverages both predictive analytics and EHRs alerts. While patient alerts lead to nurse fatigue, the proposed project will not rely on alerts alone but incorporate predictive analytics as a component of artificial intelligence (AI) (Carroll,2018). Real-time surveillance of patients can help identify possible adverse effects immediately. Instantaneous clinical decision support tools then take the analyzed surveillance and apply it within the shortest time to signal nurses to take immediate or precautionary measures or steps (Glassman, 2018). Poor usability, alert fatigue, and understanding of the program by different end-users have impacted the execution of real-time decision support tools. However, using predictive analytics algorithms and the optimization of EHR alerts will improve to ensure that syndromic surveillance improves patient outcomes in any healthcare setting.

Stakeholders Impacted by the Project

The implementation of this project will impact a host of stakeholders. Key among these include nurses, patients, their families, healthcare systems, and physicians. In their article, Schwalbe et al. (2018) assert that healthcare project stakeholders include sponsors, project managers, project teams, support staff, and regulatory entities. They also include third parties and critics of the project. In this proposed project, the project manager, the sponsor, and the team will be stakeholders as they will be directly involved in project development, implementation, and coordination. Secondly, nurses, nurse managers and leaders, support staff, and other healthcare personnel will be impacted since they will use the outcome of the syndromic surveillance to implement interventions for identified patients in their clinical practice. Patients as stakeholders will attain better outcomes through the reduction of the possibility of adverse events.

The regulatory bodies and the third parties, especially system vendors and developers, will ensure that the project’s implementation does not violate any regulations and complies with data protection and privacy laws like HIPAA and HITECH (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2022). The technology should also not be harmful to patients. Third parties like insurance organizations and even the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will be influenced as the initiative is aimed at reducing the overall cost of care through improved efficiencies and patient-quality care outcomes. The entire practice facility or healthcare organization is also a stakeholder as the project should align with its overall goals, strategy, and culture based on the mission and vision statements.

Patient Outcomes or Patient Care Efficiencies

The core aspect of any health improvement project or initiative is to enhance patient outcomes through the quality of care and enhancing efficiencies in processes. In their paper, Booth et al. (2021) implore nurses and healthcare providers as well as organizations to adopt informatics and other forms of healthcare technologies to improve patient outcomes and efficiencies in their processes. Therefore, the benefits of this initiative are immense for patients, nurses, and the healthcare system.

The use of syndromic surveillance that leverages predictive analytics and EHR alerts will lead to better patient outcomes. According to a study by Ageron et al. (2021), syndromic surveillance allows providers and public health systems to detect and monitor the occurrence of symptoms and other adverse events that may occur to patients. Using the tool, the article explores how healthcare providers leveraged the tool to predict hospital resource needs to counter the COVID-19 outbreak in Switzerland. The study notes that using the tool, public health providers and other healthcare professionals could predict and anticipate intensive care unit (ICU) occupancy by 13 days, including substantial aberration detection when the second wave occurred. The implication is that this tool will help improve the clinical decision-support abilities of nurses to offer interventions once they receive EHR alerts.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) asserts that syndromic surveillance offers healthcare professional a timely system that detects, understands, and monitor health events (Yoon et al., 2018). The system emphasizes the application of real-time pre-diagnostic data by tracking patients’ symptoms, right from the emergency department. The implication is that the implementation of the proposed solution will improve care coordination and allow nurses and other providers to support patient needs. Therefore, it will improve coordination which will enhance efficiency and overall patient outcomes.

Technologies Needed in Implementing the Project

The primary technology required in this project is artificial intelligence, especially predictive analytics and syndromic surveillance components as well as machine learning. Predictive analytics studies huge amounts of data to get indications of common symptoms, diagnoses, workflows, and other outcomes. The algorithms in predictive analytics use artificial intelligence aspects to get insight into the collected data and provide clinical decision support tools for nurses and other healthcare providers (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2022). The next technology required in this project is electronic health records (EHR) and their associated alerts. The project will leverage these technologies to develop a syndromic surveillance system to help nurses analyze patient symptoms and identify possible adverse events and make better clinical decisions.

Project Team

The project team is part of the stakeholders charged with the responsibility of planning and executing or implementing the project. The team will comprise the project sponsor, the project manager, nurse informaticists, third-party software vendors, and the financial manager. The project sponsor will be the main team member whose role will entail offering support and resources for the successful implementation of the project. The project sponsor will also ensure effective coordination and liaison with the management, especially the administrative and financial departments. The Health Information systems director will play this role (Ronquillo et al., 2021). The project manager will be the nurse manager whose main duty will be to oversight the overall implementation and coordinate the team comprising all experts and nurses. The project manager will provide weekly reports and identify areas that need improvement. The project manager will ensure that the project is completed based on the times to avoid any project creep.

Healthcare project teams should include medical experts who ensure that such initiatives are consistent with the best practices and do not harm patients (Schwalbe & Furlong, 2018). Because this project aims to enhance surveillance to improve clinical decision support, nurses and clinicians will be included. Their role would be to determine if the retrieved data provide sufficient details and can be used to identify symptoms, especially among patients at elevated risks from their disease conditions.

The informatics nurse will be a critical member of the project team and will implement the identified technologies in the healthcare practice. The informatics nurse will also evaluate the success of the project to determine if it is user-friendly and allows patients to make better clinical support decisions. The nurse informaticist will also collect information from nurses on what should be incorporated into the new system based on the organizational and practice requirements. Clinical data can only be meaningful if it is captured correctly by nurses (Hughes et al., 2020). Therefore, the nurse informaticist will also educate nurses and physicians on how to use the system and in daily operations in the facility. The informaticist will ensure that all nurses’ preferences are integrated into the system to help them attain set goals. The system vendor will also be a core part of the team with the role of providing the requisite system and its components. The vendor will install the system, and collaborate with the project manager and the nurse informatics to ensure that it meets the expected organizational functionalities.

Conclusion

The proposed project entails establishing a syndromic surveillance system to reduce adverse events by leveraging predictive analytics as a component of artificial intelligence and electronic health records (EHRs) alerts. The project will improve patient outcomes as well as organizational efficiencies by helping providers to make better clinical decisions. The project is critical in improving patient safety and ensuring that providers offer the best approach to patient needs.

References

Ageron, F. X., Hugli, O., Dami, F., Caillet-Bois, D., Pittet, V., Eckert, P., … & Carron, P. N.

(2022). Lessons from COVID-19 syndromic surveillance through emergency department activity: a prospective time series study from western Switzerland. BMJ open, 12(5), e054504. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054504.

Al Najjar, R. I., & Shafie, Z. M. (2022). Impact of Nursing Informatics on the Quality of Patient

Care. International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies, 2(5), 418-421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47191/ijms crs/v2-i5-19,

Booth, R. G., Strudwick, G., McBride, S., O’Connor, S., & López, A. L. S. (2021). How the

nursing profession should adapt for a digital future. BMJ, 373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054504

Carroll, W. (2018). Artificial intelligence, nurses, and the quadruple aim. Online Journal of

            Nursing Informatics, 22(2). http://www.himss.org/ojn

Glassman, K. S. (2018). Using data in nursing practice. American Nurse Today, 12(11), 45–47.

https://www.myamericannurse.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/ant11-Data-1030.pdf

Hughes, H. E., Edeghere, O., O’Brien, S. J., Vivancos, R., & Elliot, A. J. (2020). Emergency

department syndromic surveillance systems: a systematic review. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09949-y

McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2022). Nursing informatics and the foundation of

knowledge (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning

Ronquillo, C. E., Peltonen, L. M., Pruinelli, L., Chu, C. H., Bakken, S., Beduschi, A., … &

Topaz, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence in nursing: Priorities and opportunities from an international invitational think‐tank of the Nursing and Artificial Intelligence Leadership Collaborative. Journal of advanced nursing, 77(9), 3707-3717. DOI: 10.1111/jan.14855

Schwalbe, K., & Furlong, D. (2018). Healthcare project management (2nd ed.). Schwalbe

Publishing.

Yoon, P. W., Ising, A. I., & Gunn, J. E. (2018). Using syndromic surveillance for all-hazards

public health surveillance: successes, challenges, and the future. Public Health Reports, 132(1_suppl), 3S-6S. DOI: 10.1177/0033354917708995

Rubric

NURS_5051_Module02_Week04_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_5051_Module02_Week04_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient care efficiency. Your project proposal should include the following:· Describe the project you propose.· Identify the stakeholders impacted by this project.
25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the project proposed….The response accurately and clearly identifies the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response describes the project proposed….The response identifies the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response topics are superficially addressed.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is very vague or missing.

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this project is aimed at improving.· Explain how this improvement would occur. Be specific and provide examples. Use sufficient supporting evidence in your response.
25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies that the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an accurate and detailed explanation, with sufficient supporting evidence of how this improvement would occur.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response explains the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies that the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an explanation, with some supporting evidence of how this improvement would occur.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response is missing one or two of the required elements, contains little supporting evidence or elements are superficially addressed.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is very vague, lacking examples or supporting evidence, or missing.

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Identify the technologies required to implement this project and explain why.· Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you would incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.
25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly identifies the technologies required to implement the project proposed with a detailed explanation why….The response accurately and clearly identifies the project team (by roles) and thoroughly explains in detail how to incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response identifies the technologies required to implement the project proposed with an explanation why….The response identifies the project team (by roles) and explains how to incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response is missing one or two of the required elements, or elements are superficially addressed.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is very vague or missing.

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources
10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent

Assignment includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed research articles and 2 or more course resources.

8 to >7.0 pts

Good

Assignment includes: 2 peer-reviewed research articles and 2 course resources.

7 to >6.0 pts

Fair

Assignment includes: 1 peer-reviewed research article and 1 course resource.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

Assignment includes: 1 or no resources.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts
Total Points: 100

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6051 THE IMPACT OF NURSING INFORMATICS ON PATIENT OUTCOMES AND PATIENT CARE EFFICIENCIES

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

Also Check Out:  NURS 6051 THE APPLICATION OF DATA TO PROBLEM-SOLVING