Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NURS 6051 Assignment Literature Review The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies

NURS 6051 Assignment Literature Review The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies

Medical and health programs improve patient transparency, safety, and productivity while simultaneously increasing savings. Increasing healthcare efficiency through the use of existing services and the application of emerging technologies is a successful strategy. It is critical that patients maintain consistency throughout their recovery and receive prompt, reliable, and secure diagnosis and care. Collaboration between various health structures is critical for treatment and communication improvement (Fix & Hogan, 2016). Coordination between programs should be established to ensure that any clinician has access to sufficient knowledge whenever they require it. All hospitals must place a premium on new technologies that contribute significantly to the improvement of healthcare delivery. Additionally, the system aims to boost productivity, ensure proper health and procedure, and reduce medical errors. Clinical programs are critical to ensuring proper communication, as a lack of communication in many hospitals is a significant cause of death or injury. Strong coordination improves year after year as multiple health reports are generated electronically as part of the processes.

The Medicare and Medicaid Resources centers describe a patient’s website as a safe online portal that offers patients access to personal health details from anywhere with internet connectivity 24 hours a day. The medical record offers a comprehensive collection of information on the health of specific patients. Patients can access essential health records with a protected username and password. Through direct communication, the patient portal has strengthened relationships between the patient and the provider (Sorondo & Allen, 2016). In order to enhance medical performance, patients find it easy to contact their manufacturer with queries and complaints. Patients can schedule visits, replenish medications, make deposits, and display medical benefits, and print information materials along with e-mails. The cumulative benefit presented by patient portals must be evaluated to assess whether not only the knowledge delivery changes but also whether patients are to be provided the opportunity to engage in their treatment. In order to be incorporated entirely in the future, such technologies will be introduced in order to facilitate fewer time intensive interactions between patients and caregivers and to increase the quality of the sharing of knowledge. NURS 6051 Assignment Literature Review The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies

Web-based patient services are always part of the operation and allow patients to take control of themselves. Patients have been increasingly involved with medical services in the creation of choices to improve their conditions in their primary treatment. Doctors will typically have a report of the appointment or a discharge statement on paper for a patient. Today, a patient is often submitted electronically if the documentation is incorrect (Sieck, 2018). Chronic patients may also access information on how to manage their disease and respond to changing lifestyles. The patient becomes more active in their treatment, and direct access to their care plan through primary care has been successful. As patient interfaces begin to evolve from the processing of medical records alone to a broad variety of health services, the impact on healthcare processes have been shown. In the beginning, hospital pages were simply a means to gather or exchange details (usually examination results) with doctors from a health care professional. Electronic records have become more useful in a hospital environment to gather patient information than to search for the paperwork. Patient information and office visits to various hospital professionals participating with primary treatment will often be communicated by community staff (Tang & Lorenzi, 2016). NURS 6051 Assignment Literature Review The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies

An EHR’s essential benefit is that patient records may be generated and handled by approved providers in a digital system and is accessible to more than one health care agency in collaboration with other providers. The EHRs are focused on the exchange of knowledge with individual health care professionals and organizations – including laboratories, consultants, diagnostic imaging centers, hospitals, ambulance departments, and schools and occupational clinics. When you have a diagnosis and a full-length test study from a primary care doctor so you can see a cardiologist, you will also call up the previous clinic and show the adjustments and lab tests available and enhance the patient’s outcomes. In the area of electronic health information, many benefits have continued to grow (Waldren & Thomas Agresta, 2017). NURS 6051 Assignment Literature Review The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies

 EHRs and the opportunity to remotely share clinical records will enable you to deliver better quality, healthier medical treatment while enabling meaningful progress. The findings provided by patient databases have helped medical providers handle health treatment better. Up-to-date and correct details on primary health treatment should be provided to the user portals. Patients and healthcare practitioners should use their medical documents and quickly view the evidence generated by patients and maintain optimal treatment. Enabling professionals to help identify and reduce medical problems to offer more clinical care to safely exchange details with patients and other clinicians (Sieck, 2018). A patient may also speak directly to his or her doctor via e-mail, helping to strengthen the interaction between patient and physician, timely diagnosis, and professional advice. The patients were able to monitor their prescriptions, refill when required, and learn to prescribe and teach appropriate prescriptions. Additional improvements of online information on the patient registry include better reporting, clear identification and accounting, enhanced data safety and security, patient-provider priorities and cost savings by minimized registration, reduced check doubling, and improved wellness (Tang & Lorenzi, 2016). While most patients are elderly and do not recognize the technological medical practitioners, their discharge orders provide patient interface lessons. NURS 6051 Assignment Literature Review The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies.

NURS 6051 Assignment Literature Review The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies

NURS 6051 Assignment Literature Review The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 6051 Assignment Literature Review The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies

Within the healthcare sector, the usage of advanced robots and nanotechnology has interested doctors and researchers long. The application of these techniques provides safer methods of managing all of the human body’s tissues. Given its excellent capabilities,

scientists have long eluded the creation of such technologies. A miniature robot named HeartLander was created by Carnegie Mellon University researchers (Fix & Hogan, 2016). This device has artificial intelligence capabilities for therapies with cardiac therapy. A slight incision is made, and the robot navigates to other parts of the neck, the robot does as it needs in the healthcare sector that is a big move forward. Although the patient has accomplished initially, multiple checks have been carried out to guarantee that he can conduct the duties he wants after he is put inside the body of the patient. The bulk of platform apps include connectivity and usability (Sieck, 2018). The patient wants reports for the examination, the appointment, and the medication. The clinic would want patients to change personal records and benefits or compensate via the exchange of credit card numbers.

Both aspects of medical treatment have changed among patients and health care services. Health practitioners have continued to allow more people to utilize their patient app and to use their medical records. Health care organizations are that the capacity of patients to connect through web-based patient portals and then play a prominent position in the patient-centered health care facility. While patient portals provide several advantages in order to enhance the outcomes of patients and can engage them efficiently, the usage of patient portals is still small (Fix & Hogan, 2016). Such explanations why patient usage of patient portal resources tends to be poor include restricted awareness, lack of device and Internet knowledge, low rates of clinical literacy, and lack of physician help. As health care professionals, our responsibility is to advise patients and primary providers about the advantages of providing access to their electronic health reports and the advantages of utilizing patient services because these may play a critical role in optimizing medical satisfaction if used correctly (Fix & Hogan, 2016). NURS 6051 Assignment Literature Review The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies

In conclusion, technology continues to change through the implementation and development of patient services and electronic health records. Healthcare staff will begin to conduct experiments to check the effectiveness of the patient portal and the study outcomes and start developing and allowing more people to use study portals. Additional methods such as SMS and portable apps are being applied, all of which require the time for anyone to clarify what they are to people, how to handle them, and to identify them better. Similarly, clinicians will be interested in these innovations because the data they collect, or the patients who inquire for them, would certainly at least be partly impacted. These new technologies should be introduced as the industry advances. Studies also have shown that technologies can significantly affect patient interfaces and the engagement of patients in their treatment to maximize medical performance.

References

Fix, G. M., & Hogan, T. P. (2016). Encouraging Patient Portal Use in the Patient-Centered Medical Home: Three Stakeholder Perspectives. Journal of Medical Internet Research.

Sieck, C. J. (2018). Improving the patient experience through patient portals: Insights from experienced portal users. Patient Experience Journal.

Sorondo, B., & Allen, A. (2016). Patient Portal as a Tool for Enhancing Patient Experience and Improving Quality of Care in Primary Care Practices. EGEMS (Wash DC).

Tang, C., & Lorenzi, N. (2016). Interactive systems for patient-centered care to enhance patient engagement. J Am Med Inform Assoc.

Waldren, S. E., & Thomas, Agresta. (2017). Technology Tools and Trends for Better Patient Care: Beyond the EHR. Fam Pract Manag.

Name:  Discussion Rubric

  Excellent

90–100

Good

80–89

Fair

70–79

Poor

0–69

Main Posting:

Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s).

Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three current credible sources.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to most of the Discussion question(s).

Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three credible references.

31 (31%) – 34 (34%)

Responds to some of the Discussion question(s).

One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Cited with fewer than two credible references.

0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

Does not respond to the Discussion question(s).

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Contains only one or no credible references.

Main Posting:

Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Written clearly and concisely.

Contains no grammatical or spelling errors.

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Written concisely.

May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors.

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Written somewhat concisely.

May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Not written clearly or concisely.

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Posting:

Timely and full participation

9 (9%) – 10 (10%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts main Discussion by due date.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts main Discussion by due date.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Posts main Discussion by due date.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post main Discussion by due date.

First Response:

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

First Response:

Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.

Response is written in standard, edited English.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.

Response to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

First Response:

Timely and full participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Posts by due date.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.

Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Second Response:
Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.

Response is written in standard, edited English.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.

Response to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response:
Timely and full participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Posts by due date.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.

Total Points: 100

Name:  Discussion Rubric

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.