NURS 6050 Discussion 3 Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act PEER POSTS
Sample Answer for NURS 6050 Discussion 3 Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act PEER POSTS Included After Question
Regardless of political affiliation, individuals often grow concerned when considering perceived competing interests of government and their impact on topics of interest to them. The realm of healthcare is no different. Some people feel that local, state, and federal policies and legislation can be either helped or hindered by interests other than the benefit to society.
Consider for example that the number one job of a legislator is to be reelected. Cost can be measured in votes as well as dollars. Thus, it is important to consider the legislator’s perspective on either promoting or not promoting a certain initiative in the political landscape.
To Prepare:
- Review the Resources and reflect on efforts to repeal/replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
- Consider who benefits the most when policy is developed and in the context of policy implementation.
By Day 3 of Week 3
Post an explanation for how you think the cost-benefit analysis in terms of legislators being reelected affected efforts to repeal/replace the ACA. Then, explain how analyses of the votes views may affect decisions by legislative leaders in recommending or positioning national policies (e.g., Congress’ decisions impacting Medicare or Medicaid). Remember, the number one job of a legislator is to be re-elected. Please check your discussion grading rubric to ensure your responses meet the criteria.
By Day 6 of Week 3
Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by expanding on their explanation and providing an example that supports their explanation or respectfully challenging their explanation and providing an example.
Click on the Reply button below to reveal the textbox for entering your message. Then click on the Submit button to post your message.
*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 6050 Discussion 3 Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act PEER POSTS
Title: NURS 6050 Discussion 3 Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act PEER POSTS
Great post! As mentioned in the learning module, legislators’ primary goal is to be reelected. If the person is not reelected, they are out of a job. Therefore, most if not all decisions made by legislators are influenced by their main goal which is reelection. You mentioned a concern for legislators’ decision making based on the goal of being reelected. Although I do agree the primary goal should be a positive impact on the public, it could be beneficial for legislators to make decisions based on their goal for reelection because it will most likely be aligned with the views from those who elected the individual in hopes to be reelected by the same voters. According to Fouirnaies & Hall (2022) legislators who are not up for reelection sponsor less bills, have decreased participation in floor votes, and are less productive on committees. The decrease participation among those not up for reelection is concerning because it shows disinterest in their role. If legislators are not actively participating in policies, then the area or district that person represents is not being represented adequately.
Legislators do not base their decisions only on public opinion. Did you know that there is an agency within the government that is dedicated to cost-benefit analysis and does not hire employees based off political affiliation? The Congressional Budget Office provides nonbiased economic analyses and reports for hundreds of proposed legislations each year (The Congressional Budget Office, n.d.). This agency provides facts and data related to current proposed legislation.
A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NURS 6050 Discussion 3 Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act PEER POSTS
Title: NURS 6050 Discussion 3 Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act PEER POSTS
As you mentioned, as Health care workers it is imperative that we are aware and up to date on regulations, policies in the health care field. Policies and procedures set expectations for proper ways of doing things. They guide us day by day within activities, helping promote consistency in practices, reduces mistakes, and keeps patients and staff safe. Health care workers deal regular with life-or-death scenarios. having proper policies in force helps us as providers to make good decisions and provide the best care to our patients. These policies improve operational excellence and patient care (Power DMS, 2020). I have been a nurse for 21 years, we are responsible for the care of these patients and out goal is to provide the best quality of care to each patient. ACA repeal would throw insurance markets into chaos as millions would lose coverage during a pandemic. As you mentioned, by being repealed Americans would lose their coverage, causing the biggest health insurance loss event recorded in history. And just to imagine how it would be worldwide, patients with no insurance, getting sick and unable to be cared for. The pandemics that can occur and not only for the individual or family being affected, but the society.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6050 Discussion 3 Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act PEER POSTS
Reference:
Power DMS, (2020). Writing Policies and Procedures in Health care. Retrieved on June 13, 2021 from https://www.powerdms.com/policy-learning-center/writing-policies-and-procedures-in-health-care
A Sample Answer 4 For the Assignment: NURS 6050 Discussion 3 Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act PEER POSTS
Title: NURS 6050 Discussion 3 Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act PEER POSTS
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) is a revolutionary policy. This Act wanted to address social injustices in the American healthcare system. However, this policy has met stiff opposition from Republican legislators who openly opposed it. When Donald Trump came to power, repealing ACA was one of his number one priorities. They, however, did not get the requisite number to repeal ACA since other legislators felt like many Americans would be affected. Many Republican lawmakers started seeing that they may not get reelected if they continued to support the repeal of ACA.
In May 2017, the House of Representatives passed the American Health Care Act (Jost, 2017). This was the first attempt at repealing ACA. The Trump administration wanted to use this act to repeal ACA. However, this Act would make millions of Americans lose health insurance coverage. AHCA proposed that tax credit be based on age, which would increase healthcare costs. This Act also created the Patient and State Stability Fund, which would reduce premiums by 25% after 2026 (Jost, 2017). This would increase healthcare costs for Americans with preexisting comorbid conditions.
A cost-benefit analysis by Republican lawmakers revealed that they would not get reelected because of the negative effects of repealing. Repealing ACA would lead to millions of Americans losing insurance coverage (Straw & Aron-Dine, 2020). This was the main reason for implementing ACA. ACA aimed to increase insurance coverage to millions of Americans and reduce healthcare costs (Sommers, 2020). Due to reelection purposes, the Senate Majority Leader McConnell found it hard to garner support for AHCA. To protect their political interest, the US senators came up with another proposal known as the Better Care Reconciliation Act of 2017 (Smith & Gibbs, 2017).
Members of Congress and Senators are elected leaders who must be voted for by the public. Due to this, their positions on policies such as Obamacare are influenced by how their electorates feel. Because of this, their interest is reelection and not ACA.
References
Jost, T. S. (2017). House passes AHCA; HHS acts on regulations. Health Affairs, 36(6), 982-983.
Smith, K., & Gibbs, T. E. (2017). The APHA PHACT campaign in action in Delaware. Delaware Journal of Public Health, 3(4), 6-11.
Sommers, B. D. (2020). Health insurance coverage: What comes after the ACA? Health Affairs, 39(3), 502-508.
Straw, T., & Aron-Dine, A. (2020). Commentary: ACA Repeal Even More Dangerous During Pandemic and Economic Crisis. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. https://www.cbpp.org/research/health/commentary-aca-repeal-even-more-dangerous-during-pandemic-and-economic-crisis
A Sample Answer 5 For the Assignment: NURS 6050 Discussion 3 Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act PEER POSTS
Title: NURS 6050 Discussion 3 Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act PEER POSTS
Your post well describes the outcome of cost-benefit analysis and recognizes how it was represented regarding attempts to repeal/replace the ACA during the Trump administration. It is clear that that is no longer a threat during the Biden administration.
The last statement of “….their interest is re-election and not ACA.” This statement highlights the level of politics within politics. Interest groups spend resources on trying to remove legislators who do not share in their intentions. Americans would be better served by policy-motivated committees that dissect and evaluate the benefit of a bill before allowing it to be considered (Lorenz, 2020). Everything boils down to the dollar. I understand health care and politics are as much of a business as anything else. However, it is unfortunate the system is overly saturated with misguided interests, and how does this benefit me. Personal experiences weigh heavily on attitudes toward the government and health care policies within contemporary societies (Larson, 2020). Lobbyists aid in providing and identifying agendas; these “agenda setters” would be more likely to perform in the public’s best interest if a policy-motivated committee was the influence behind new bills (Lorenz, 2020).
Larsen, G. (2020. Personal politics? Healthcare policies, personal experiences and government attitudes. Journal of European Social Policy.
https://doi.10.1177/0958928720904319
Lorenz, G. (2020). Prioritized interests: Diverse lobbying coalitions and congressional committee agenda setting. University of Chicago Press Journals.
https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/705744
Grading Rubric Guidelines
| Performance Category | 10 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 0 |
| Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Performance Category | 10 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 0 |
| Application of Course Knowledge –
Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
|
|
|
|
|
| Performance Category | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Interactive Dialogue
Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days. (5 points possible per graded thread) |
|
Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. |
|
|
|
| Minus 1 Point | Minus 2 Point | Minus 3 Point | Minus 4 Point | Minus 5 Point | |
| Grammar, Syntax, APA
Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted. Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 points lost | -5 points lost | ||||
| Total Participation Requirements
per discussion thread |
The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. | The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days | |||
| Early Participation Requirement
per discussion thread |
The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. | The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT. |