Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NURS 6050 Assignment Assessing a Healthcare Program Policy Evaluation

NURS 6050 Assignment Assessing a Healthcare Program Policy Evaluation

Complete the Module 5 Assessment Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation using this document.

Evaluation of Healthcare Programs/Policies

Medicaid

Program of Medicaid

Created in 1965, is a public insurance program. It is this program that assists in assuring low-income Americans in accordance with the Affordable Care Act. It is an entitlement” program, meaning that anyone who meets the eligibility requirements has the right to enroll in Medicaid coverage.

Please click here to ORDER AN ORIGINAL PAPER ON
The insurance program covers low-income individuals and families, including parents, children, pregnant women, people, and the elderly with disabilities; it is jointly sponsored by the states and the federal government. Each state administers its Medicaid program in accordance with federal guidelines (CBPP, 2020).

How was the program’s or policy’s success determined?

The success of the medic aide program was determined by its quality performance. The change in total coverage was calculated using data from the Current Population Survey (CPS), the Employer Insurance and Massachusetts Household Survey, and the Massachusetts Health Care Survey. The Health Connector discovered that the average rate of insurance coverage increased from a median of 93 percent in 2006 to 97-98 percent in 2011 as a result of state-level health reform. The Massachusetts Division of Finance and Health Care Policy reported that over 400,000 residents gained insurance between 2006 and 2010: 193,000 through Medicaid expansion (Mansur, Himmelstein, Keays, & Walsh, 2013). NURS 6050 Assignment: Evaluating a Healthcare Program’s Policy

How many people were impacted by the chosen program or policy? How much impact was achieved through the program or policy chosen?

As of 2019, an estimated 75 million Americans were enrolled in the Medicaid program. This is a significant increase from approximately 50 million ten years ago (Statista, 2019). It had a significant impact on the health care industry, which benefited, the federal budget, and the economy as a whole. The experience and knowledge gained from the extensive effects of Medicaid) are likely to have had a significant impact on any future major health insurance initiative as well.

What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?

To conduct the Medicaid program evaluation, the sources that they used, like hospital discharges, comprise multiple diagnoses and procedures performed record, DRG (diagnosis-related group) allocated, and another hospital stays information. Moreover, they used the OASIS and Outcome & Assessment Information Set, MDS, or Minimum Data Set and IRF-PAI or Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility-Patient Assessment Instrument (Millett & Shortliffe, 2012).

What were the specific information on unintended consequences identified?

NURS 6050 Assignment Assessing a Healthcare Program Policy Evaluation

NURS 6050 Assignment Assessing a Healthcare Program Policy Evaluation

 

Click here to ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ON  NURS 6050 Assignment Assessing a Healthcare Program Policy Evaluation Sample

As an unintended health reform consequence, lots of insurers stopped proposing individual children coverage. That places parents in a

dilemma and children at risk. Indirect subsidies Unwell targeted programs carry more risk of unintended consequences. This regulation of reform drives the cost of health insurance of child-only up very high that premiums in numerous states are unaffordable (Nance-Nash, 2012).
What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit the most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.

Stakeholders consist of senior agency and Medicaid leadership, the State legislature, the provider community, the Governor’s office, the advocacy and patient community, as well as the CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) (Ahrq, 2020).

For the evaluation of the Medicaid program, low-income families and children would benefit. For instance, Medicaid in the U.S. pays for 40% of all births, covering services of prenatal, delivery, as well as post-partum care (PGPF, 2012).

Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?

The program was failing to meet its intent or objectives. As that

Medicare insurance program of hospitals for the aged only was not adequate to meet the several medical needs of the blind, disabled, aged, or the children or mothers receiving help for dependent children. Moreover, its object cost of insured low-income families or children was not sufficient as per the federal.

Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?

I would like to implement this program at my workplace because it will be beneficial or helpful for the people who are from very low-income class. Even this program would give them the \certain level of satisfaction for fulfilling the needs of children and families security.

Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after one year of implementation.

In the evaluation of the Medicaid program, I could become want to involved in this program in some ways:

By encouraging patients or their families towards this insurance coverage.
By providing quality and effective care to patients.
By participating in the operations of this program.

General Notes/Comments
The most important thing about the Medicaid healthcare program is that this provides complete security to the children, parents, and families of low-income groups. So, it is effective to adopt this policy.

The Assignment: (2–3 pages)

Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following:

  • Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes.
  • How was the success of the program or policy measured?
  • How many people were reached by the program or policy selected?
  • How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?
  • At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?
  • What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?
  • What specific information on unintended consequences was identified?
  • What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.
  • Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?
  • Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?
  • Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after 1 year of implementation.

Assignment: Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

Nurses can play a very important role assessing program/policy evaluation for the same reasons that they can be so important to program/policy design. Nurses bring expertise and patient advocacy that can add significant insight and impact. In this Assignment, you will practice applying this expertise and insight by selecting an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation and reflecting on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program/policy.

Program/policy evaluation is a valuable tool that can help strengthen the quality of programs/policies and improve outcomes for the populations they serve. Program/policy evaluation answers basic questions about program/policy effectiveness. It involves collecting and analyzing information about program/policy activities, characteristics, and outcomes. This information can be used to ultimately improve program services or policy initiatives.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template provided in the Resources.
  • Select an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation or choose one of interest to you.
  • Review community, state, or federal policy evaluation and reflect on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program or policy described.

By Day 7 of Week 10

Submit your completed healthcare program/policy evaluation analysis.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK10Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 10 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 10 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK10Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
  • Due to the nature of this assignment, your instructor may require more than 5 days to provide you with quality feedback.
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 10 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 10 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 10

To submit your Assignment:

Week 10 Assignment


Module 5: Looking Ahead

Please Note: The Module 6, Week 11 Assignment, Global Healthcare Comparison Matrix and Narrative Statement, is due on Day 5 of Week 11.

Next Module

To go to the next module:

Excellent Good Fair Poor
Program/Policy Evaluation

Based on the program or policy evaluation you seelcted, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following:

·   Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes.
·   How was the success of the program or policy measured?
·   How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?
·   At what point in time in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?

32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

Response clearly and accurately describes in detail the healthcare program or policy outcomes.

Response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the success of the program or policy was measured.

Response clearly and accurately describes in detail how many people were reached by the program or policy and fully describes the impact of the program or policy.

Response clearly and accurately indicates the point at which time the program or policy evaluation was conducted.

28 (28%) – 31 (31%)

Response accurately describes the healthcare program or policy outcomes.

Response accurately explains how the success of the program or policy was measured.

Response accurately describes how many people were reached by the program or policy and accurately describes the impact of the program or policy.

Response accurately indicates the point at which time the program or policy evaluation was conducted.

25 (25%) – 27 (27%)

Description of the healthcare program or policy outcomes is inaccurate or incomplete.

Explanation of how the success of the program or policy was measured is inaccurate or incomplete.

Description of how many people were reached by the program or policy and the impact is vague or inaccurate.

Response vaguely describes the point at which the program or policy evaluation was conducted.

(0%) – 24 (24%)

Description of the healthcare program or policy outcomes is inaccurate and incomplete, or is missing.

Explanation of how the success of the program or policy was measured is inaccurate and incomplete, or is missing.

Description of how many people were reached by the program or policy and the associated impacts is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Response of the point at which time the program or policy was conducted is missing.

Reporting of Program/Policy Evaluations

·   What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?
·   What specific information on unintended consequences was identified?
·   What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit the most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.
·   Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?
·   Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?
·   Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after 1 year of implementation.

45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Response clearly and accurately identifies the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation.

Response clearly and thoroughly explains in detail specific information on outcomes and unintended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation.

Response clearly and accurately explains in detail the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation.

Response clearly and accurately explains in detail who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation.

Response includes a thorough and accurate explanation of whether the program met the original intent and outcomes, including an accurate and detailed explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not.

Response includes a thorough and accurate explanation of whether the program should be implemented, including an accurate and detailed explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Response accurately identifies the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation.

Response explains in detail specific information on outcomes and unintended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation.

Response explains in detail the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation.

Response explains who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation.

Response includes an accurate explanation of whether the program met the original intent and outcomes, including an accurate explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not.

Response includes an accurate explanation of whether the program should be implemented, including an accurate explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation.

Explanation of specific information on outcomes and unintended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation is vague or incomplete.

Explanation of the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation is vague or inaccurate.

Explanation of who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation is vague or inaccurate.

Explanation of whether the program/policy met the original intent and outcomes and the reasons why or why not is incomplete or inaccurate.

Explanation of whether the program or policy should be implemented, and the reasons why or why not, is incomplete or inaccurate.

(0%) – 34 (34%)

Identification of the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Explanation of specific information on outcomes and unitended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation is vague and incomplete, or is missing.

Explanation of the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Explanation of who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Explanation of whether the program or policy met the original intent and outcomes and the reasons why or why not is incomplete and inaccurate, or is missing.

Explanation of whether the program or policy should be implemented, and the reasons why or why not, is incomplete and inaccurate, or is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

(5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

(4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

(0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

(5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.