NURS 6050 AGENDA COMPARISON GRID AND FACT SHEET

Sample Answer for NURS 6050 AGENDA COMPARISON GRID AND FACT SHEET Included After Question

It may seem to you that healthcare has been a national topic of debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember.

Healthcare has been a policy item and a topic of debate not only in recent times but as far back as the administration of the second U.S. president, John Adams. In 1798, Adams signed legislation requiring that 20 cents per month of a sailor’s paycheck be set aside for covering their medical bills. This represented the first major piece of U.S. healthcare legislation, and the topic of healthcare has been woven into presidential agendas and political debate ever since.

As a healthcare professional, you may be called upon to provide expertise, guidance and/or opinions on healthcare matters as they are debated for inclusion into new policy. You may also be involved in planning new organizational policy and responses to changes in legislation. For all of these reasons you should be prepared to speak to national healthcare issues making the news.

In this Assignment, you will analyze recent presidential healthcare agendas. You also will prepare a fact sheet to communicate the importance of a healthcare issue and the impact on this issue of recent or proposed policy.

To Prepare:

  • Review the agenda priorities of the current/sitting U.S. president and at least one previous presidential administration.
  • Select an issue related to healthcare that was addressed by two U.S. presidential administrations (current and previous).
  • Consider how you would communicate the importance of a healthcare issue to a legislator/policymaker or a member of their staff for inclusion on an agenda.
  • Use your Week 1 Discussion post to help with this assignment.

The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page narrative) with a title page. This is an APA paper. Use 2-3 course resources and at least 2 outside resources.

Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid

Use the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and complete the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current/sitting U.S. president and the previous president, and their agendas related to the population health concern you selected. Be sure to address the following:

  • Identify and provide a brief description of the population health concern you selected.
  • Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.
  • Identify the allocation of resources that the presidents dedicated to this issue.

Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis

Using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid on the template, complete the Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis portion of the template, by addressing the following:

  • Which administrative agency (like HHS, CDC, FDA, OHSA) would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected and why is this agency the most helpful for the issue?
  • How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the presidential agenda? How does it stay there?
  • An entrepreneur/champion/sponsor helps to move the issue forward. Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor (this can be a celebrity, a legislator, an agency director, or others) of the healthcare issue you selected and why would this person be a good entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor? An example is Michael J. Fox is champion for Parkinson’s disease.

Part 3: Fact Sheet

NURS 6050 AGENDA COMPARISON GRID AND FACT SHEET
NURS 6050 AGENDA COMPARISON GRID AND FACT SHEET

Using the information recorded on the template in Parts 1 and 2, develop a 1-page fact sheet that you could use to communicate with a policymaker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue. Be sure to address the following:

  • Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.
  • Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

By Day 7 of Week 2

Submit your final version of Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis, and Part 3: Narrative.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 2 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 2 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

It may seem to you that healthcare has been a national topic of debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember. 

Healthcare has been a policy item and a topic of debate not only in recent times but as far back as the administration of the second U.S. president, John Adams. In 1798, Adams signed legislation requiring that 20 cents per month of a sailor’s paycheck be set aside for covering their medical bills. This represented the first major piece of U.S. healthcare legislation, and the topic of healthcare has been woven into presidential agendas and political debate ever since. 

As a healthcare professional, you may be called upon to provide expertise, guidance and/or opinions on healthcare matters as they are debated for inclusion into new policy. You may also be involved in planning new organizational policy and responses to changes in legislation. For all of these reasons you should be prepared to speak to national healthcare issues making the news. 

In this Assignment, you will analyze recent presidential healthcare agendas. You also will prepare a fact sheet to communicate the importance of a healthcare issue and the impact on this issue of recent or proposed policy. 

To Prepare: 

Review the agenda priorities of the current/sitting U.S. president and at least one previous presidential administration. 

Select an issue related to healthcare that was addressed by two U.S. presidential administrations (current and previous). 

Consider how you would communicate the importance of a healthcare issue to a legislator/policymaker or a member of their staff for inclusion on an agenda. 

Use your Week 1 Discussion post to help with this assignment. 

The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page narrative) with a title page. This is an APA paper. Use 2-3 course resources and at least 2 outside resources. 

Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid 

Use the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and complete the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current/sitting U.S. president and the previous president, and their agendas related to the population health concern you selected. Be sure to address the following: 

Identify and provide a brief description of the population health concern you selected. 

Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. 

Identify the allocation of resources that the presidents dedicated to this issue. 

Working on a college campus for over 15 years in my nursing career I chose my Master of Science in Nursing Specialty as Family Nurse Practitioner. I witness the gap in care after completing high school to employment. Family Nurse Practitioner look at the whole body and will meet the need of the patient. This will help me meet the needs of the student and not leave them without care.  Physicians are not easily accessible in rural area being a FNP. This give me an opportunity to educate and care to a vulnerable group of youth. Family Nurse practitioners(FNP) have a plethora of employment options upon graduation (Worch &Bockwoldt, 2021).

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6050 AGENDA COMPARISON GRID AND FACT SHEET

I struggled with Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner.  I see with this population that they have a mental health disconnect.  During this pandemic I have witness more college students have issues.  So this made it very different to decide between the two. Mental health is a major issue in a very vulnerable population.

In my professional career I want to be able to educate and care for my patients. I want them to be able to be open to communicate with me regarding their health concerns.  Any referrals that would be needed to care for my patient I will be open to meeting their needs.  Referrals will help me care for patient and meet their needs on every spectrum. I’m willing to join associatons and do any education program to meet the needs of my patient.

Reference

Echevarrria, I.M. (2018). Make connections by joining a professional nursing organization. Nursing, 48(12), 35-38.

Woroch, R. & Bockwoldt, D. (2021) The growing need to provide training in clinical procedures in family nurse practitioner educational programs. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. 33 (5) 353- 358.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 6050 AGENDA COMPARISON GRID AND FACT SHEET

Title: NURS 6050 AGENDA COMPARISON GRID AND FACT SHEET

Different presidents have different agendas on health care issues and concerns when they are elected into the Oval Office. These concerns become presidential agendas because of their effects on public health and individual’s wellbeing. The opioid crisis remains a national public health concern with presidents making it part of their presidential agendas and seeking Americans’ support to tackle it. Positioning the opioid crisis as a presidential agenda is essential in getting solutions to issue because of its devastating effects on health outcomes and quality of life (Robeznieks, 2021). The essence of this comparison grid is to compare how current and previous administrations have handled the Opioid crisis. The paper in its three parts discusses the concern and offers analysis and a brief its significance and the role of nurses in setting agenda for healthcare issues. Use this Agenda Comparison Grid to document information about the population health/healthcare issue you selected  

Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid  

Identify the Population Health concern you selected.  The population health issue selected is the Opioid Crisis and Overdose.    
Describe the Population Health concern you selected.  Opioid abuse or addiction occurs due to the use of prescription drugs, non-prescription drugs and outlawed substances or illegal drugs. The Center for Disease Control and Prevent asserts that the epidemic leads to catastrophic impacts on individuals, neighborhoods and communities. These effects include substance use disorder, mental health issues and mortality that may happen due to overdosing of the drugs. For instance, in 2016 Opioid overdose caused over 46,000 deaths. Recent statistics show that close to 90,000 overdose fatalities occurred between 2019 and 2020 President Trump declared the opioid crisis a public health emergency. The National Institute of Health (NIH) asserts that the crisis costs the economy over $78 billion each year due to expenses related to treatment, healthcare costs, criminal involvement and rehabilitation as well as time lost by the most affected individuals. Federal departments and agencies have dedicated resources and strategies to tackle the epidemic. The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) launched a 5-point strategy focused on empowering communities to tackle the opioid epidemic with the aim of reducing morbidity and mortality.     
Administration (President Name)  Current President 

President Joe Biden 

Previous Present  

President Donald Trump  

Previous President 

President Barack Obama 

Explain how each of the two presidential administrations approached the issue.  The current Biden administration focuses on ensuring that people have access to high quality health care that comprises of substance use disorder treatment and mental health services. Through efforts to expand insurance coverage under the Affordable Care Act or Obamacare, the Biden administration is keen on expanding Medicaid for mental health and substance use disorder services (Robeznieks, 2021). The administration has also boosted access to overdose treatment and prevention   President Trump make efforts to tackle the problem by increasing border patrols through his agenda of building a wall on the border with Mexico to control the trafficking of drugs. The seizure of heroin and trafficking arrests that doubled between 2007 and 2017 are some of the continual efforts by the president Trump to deal with the crisis.  

Efforts by the administration also include introduction of new limits on opioid prescriptions through the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines (Frank & Haffjee, 2019). Under his administration, the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) introduced pharmaceutical companies to minimize their production of certain opioids like morphine and fentanyl. The Justice Department also ramped up its efforts to prosecute those involved in trafficking and over prescription of drugs. 

It is important to note that the Trump Administration declared the opioid epidemic as a national health emergency.   

The Obama administration focused on efforts to create and develop programs like monitoring of prescription, drug take-back at local police stations and pharmacies within the community. The administration enhanced programs to rehabilitate and treat individuals battling actions. The rolling out of the Affordable Care Act was a critical step in enhancing access to healthcare, including mental health for millions of Americans and their families battling the opioid epidemic. Obama also signed the Bipartisan Bill to Combat Opioid Epidemic in 2016. The bill aimed at offering a multifaceted approach to dealing with the epidemic and enhancing access to effective treatment.  
Identify the allocations of resources that the current and previous presidents dedicated to this issue.  The Biden administration has proposed to allocate or spend about $125 billion to tackle the crisis (Ellerbeck, 2020). The resources will focus on developing prevention programs, treatment and recovery effort.   The Trump administration allocated over $13 billion to assist law enforcement to initiate several novel initiatives to respond to the crisis. The administration made an addition allocation of 1.6 billion to 12 states and 13 counties with high drug abuse cases (Frank & Haffjee, 2019). The administration also outlined 21 billion for infrastructure and $23 billion to enhance border security, including the construction of the border wall.   The Obama administration allocated close to $28 billion to support efforts to control drug trafficking and other activities like treatment and creating awareness.  
Explain how each of  

the presidential  

administrations  

approached the issue. 

The Biden administration’s main approach is to allocate more resources to battle the epidemic amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic. The administration is also keen restructuring the criminal justice system to ensure that no individual is jailed due to drug use alone (Ellerbeck, 2020). The administration is also keen on holding big Pharmaceuticals responsible for the over-prescription of opioids.   The main approach of the administration on the issue was to enhance border security and have stricter indictment using the Justice Department for drug dealers. The administration also enacted a Safer Prescribing Initiative to reduce opioid prescription fills by over one-third.   The primary approach to dealing with the crisis was expansion of health access through the Affordable Care Act. Enforcement efforts targeted illegal opioid supply chain, stopping physician-shopping attempts and having experts to offer guidance.  

Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis  

 

Administration   Biden Administration  Trump Administration   Obama Administration 
Which administrative agency (like HHS, CDC, FDA, OHSA) would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected? Why is this agency the most helpful? 

 

The Biden administration is more likely to use the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).   Under president Trump, the most likely administrative agency to assist in the crisis was the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA). The agency was responsible for controlling illegal quantities of opioids getting into the country.   President Obama’s administration focused its efforts through the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration (SAMHSA). The administration showed its commitment even during the administration of Obama’s successor, Trump.  

 

 

 

 

How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the presidential agenda? How does it stay there?  Upon the identification of a public health issue, proposals on how to combat it is taken to a public representative who brings the issue to Congress through the legislative process (Robeznieks, 2021). Upon its approval through voting, the proposed bill is sent to the President for his or her assent so that it becomes law.   Upon the identification of a public health issue, proposals on how to combat it is taken to a public representative who brings the issue to Congress through the legislative process. Upon its approval through voting, the proposed bill is sent to the President for his or her assent so that it becomes law.  Upon the identification of a public health issue, proposals on how to combat it is taken to a public representative who brings the issue to Congress through the legislative process (SAMHSA, 2017) Upon its approval through voting, the proposed bill is sent to the President for his or her assent so that it becomes law. 
Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor (this can be a celebrity, a legislator, an agency director, or others) of the healthcare issue you selected? An example is Michael J. Fox a champion for Parkinson’s disease.  Healthcare stakeholders include consumers and community members, especially vulnerable and racial minorities. These individuals share similar perspectives on remedying the situation. Therefore, they are the most effective in championing the healthcare issue of addressing the opioid crisis.   Healthcare stakeholders include consumers and community members, especially vulnerable and racial minorities. These individuals share similar perspectives on remedying the situation. Therefore, they are the most effective in championing the healthcare issue of addressing the opioid crisis.   Healthcare stakeholders include consumers and community members, especially vulnerable and racial minorities. These individuals share similar perspectives on remedying the situation. Therefore, they are the most effective in championing the healthcare issue of addressing the opioid crisis.  

 

Part 3: Narrative 

The opioid crisis is a serious public health issue or concern that affects the nation and needs long-term interventions. As demonstrated, the current Biden administration and the previous administrations of Presidents Trump and Obama continue to develop strategies and interventions to address the issue through enacting legislations, making declaration that the epidemic is a national emergency. The opioid crisis is a n important healthcare issue because of the adverse effects that it creates to the entire population. Close to 90,000 Americans lose their lives each year due to this epidemic while many individuals and communities bear the brunt of the economic and social impacts that the situation creates in their lives, homes and communities (Wen & Sadeghi, 2020). Therefore, it is an important issue that should always inform any president and presidential candidate. The opioid crisis is a public health issue and one that requires the implementation of evidence-based practice interventions.   

Nurses are a critical component of healthcare delivery and interact more with patients and health populations than other health professionals. As such, they advocate for their patients and colleagues for better care delivery, welfare, and attainment of optimal care outcomes. As patient advocates and frontline care providers, they play a critical role in setting agenda for healthcare issues because they understand the extent of these matters and their effects on patients. Nurses’ role includes implementing evidence-based practice interventions, providing culturally-competent care and addressing health emergencies and diseases; especially epidemics and pandemics (Robeznieks, 2021). The inclusion of nurses in agenda setting ensures that they present issues which impact patients and hinder the delivery of patient-centered care, especially in communities with serious incidences of opioid overdose. Therefore, the role of nurses includes having an expertise perspective as they are professionals who understand the concerns that impact patients and their families.  

Conclusion 

The Opioid crisis remains a national health issue and concern that requires all administration, especially at the federal, too develop interventions to mitigate its prevalence. As illustrated in this analysis, nurses and other providers should develop a collaborative approach to address the current opioid crisis that has been exacerbated the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, practitioners and other stakeholders must offer support to government to develop better interventions to reduce the prevalence of the issue.  

 

References 

Department of Health and Human Services. 5-Point Strategy to Combat the Opioid Crisis.  

Ellerbeck, A. (2020). The Health 202: Biden will also have the opioid epidemic to deal with amid the coronavirus pandemic.  

Felter, C. (2021). The U.S. Opioid Epidemic. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-opioid-epidemic 

Frank, R. G. & Haffjee, R. L. (2019). The Trump Administration’s Actions to Address the Opioids Public Health Crisis–Reply. JAMA  

https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/opioids/biden-administration-boosts-access-overdose-prevention-treatment 

https://www.hhs.gov/opioids/about-the-epidemic/hhs-response/index.html  

https://www.samhsa.gov/newsroom/press-announcements/202103110230 

Lancet, 396(10259):1316-1318. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32113-9.  

Psychiatry, 2019;76(1):101-102. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.2761 

Robeznieks, A. (2021). Biden administration boosts access to overdose prevention, treatment.  

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) (2021). With Pandemic Worsening the Mental Illness and Addiction Crisis, Biden Administration to Provide Nearly $2.5 Billion to States, Territories for Treatment, Prevention Aid  

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) (2017). SAMHSA Reaffirms Efforts to Address the Public Health Emergency on the Opioid Crisis. https://www.samhsa.gov/newsroom/press-announcements/201710260100 

The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/16/health-202-biden-will-also-have-opioid-epidemic-deal-with-amid-coronavirus-pandemic/ 

Wen, L. S. & Sadeghi, N. B. (2020). The opioid crisis and the 2020 US election: crossroads for a national epidemic.  

 Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet 

It may seem to you that healthcare has been a national topic of debate among political leaders for as long as you can remember. 

Healthcare has been a policy item and a topic of debate not only in recent times but as far back as the administration of the second U.S. president, John Adams. In 1798, Adams signed legislation requiring that 20 cents per month of a sailor’s paycheck be set aside for covering their medical bills. This represented the first major piece of U.S. healthcare legislation, and the topic of healthcare has been woven into presidential agendas and political debate ever since. 

As a healthcare professional, you may be called upon to provide expertise, guidance and/or opinions on healthcare matters as they are debated for inclusion into new policy. You may also be involved in planning new organizational policy and responses to changes in legislation. For all of these reasons you should be prepared to speak to national healthcare issues making the news. 

In this Assignment, you will analyze recent presidential healthcare agendas. You also will prepare a fact sheet to communicate the importance of a healthcare issue and the impact on this issue of recent or proposed policy. 

To Prepare: 

  • Review the agenda priorities of the current/sitting U.S. president and at least one previous presidential administration. 
  • Select an issue related to healthcare that was addressed by two U.S. presidential administrations (current and previous). 
  • Consider how you would communicate the importance of a healthcare issue to a legislator/policymaker or a member of their staff for inclusion on an agenda. 
  • Use your Week 1 Discussion post to help with this assignment. 

The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid, 1-Page Analysis, and 1-page narrative) with a title page. This is an APA paper. Use 2-3 course resources and at least 2 outside resources. 

Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid 

Use the Agenda Comparison Grid Template found in the Learning Resources and complete the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid based on the current/sitting U.S. president and the previous president, and their agendas related to the population health concern you selected. Be sure to address the following: 

  • Identify and provide a brief description of the population health concern you selected. 
  • Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. 
  • Identify the allocation of resources that the presidents dedicated to this issue. 

Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis 

Using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid on the template, complete the Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis portion of the template, by addressing the following: 

  • Which administrative agency (like HHS, CDC, FDA, OHSA) would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected and why is this agency the most helpful for the issue? 
  • How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the presidential agenda? How does it stay there? 
  • An entrepreneur/champion/sponsor helps to move the issue forward. Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor (this can be a celebrity, a legislator, an agency director, or others) of the healthcare issue you selected and why would this person be a good entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor? An example is Michael J. Fox is champion for Parkinson’s disease. 

Part 3: Fact Sheet 

Using the information recorded on the template in Parts 1 and 2, develop a 1-page fact sheet that you could use to communicate with a policymaker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue. Be sure to address the following: 

  • Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. 
  • Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues. 

By Day 7 of Week 2 

Submit your final version of Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis, and Part 3: Narrative. 

Submission and Grading Information 

 

Rubric Detail 

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Name: NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid

Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.

Identify the allocations of resources that the two presidents dedicated to this issue.

18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

The response clearly and accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The response accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The response is vague or partially inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the issue.

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

The response is missing or inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the issue.

Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis- Address the following:

Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected? Why is this agency most helpful?

How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda? How does it stay there?

Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected and justify your selection.

23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

The response clearly and accurately identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful.

Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there.

The response clearly and accurately identifies and justifies the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected.

20 (20%) – 22 (22%)

The response identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful.

Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there.

Identification and justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue is included.

18 (18%) – 19 (19%)

The identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is vague or inaccurate and justification is inaccurate or misaligned for why that agency is most helpful.

Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague or inaccurate.

Identification and/or justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or does not align with the healthcare issue.

0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

Identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is missing.

Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is inaccurate or missing.

Identification and/or justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or missing.

Part 3: Fact Sheet

Based on your Agenda Comparison Grid for the healthcare issue you selected, develop a 1-2-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policy- maker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue.

Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.

Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues

27 (27%) – 30 (30%)

Creates an accurate and thorough fact sheet.

Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate synthesis of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.

Response accurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

24 (24%) – 26 (26%)

Creates an accurate fact sheet.

Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate summary evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.

Response accurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

21 (21%) – 23 (23%)

Creates a fact sheet that is partially accurate or incomplete.

Response provides an incomplete or inaccurate summary of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.

Response partially or inaccurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues.

0 (0%) – 20 (20%)

Creates a fact sheet that is inaccurate or incomplete.

Response provides an inaccurate summary of evidence or evidence is missing on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.

Response justifying the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues is inaccurate and incomplete or missing.

Resources 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Response includes 3 or more course resources and 2 or more outside sources.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Response includes 2-3 course resources and 2 outside sources.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Response includes fewer than 2 course resources and/or fewer than 2 outside resources.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response includes 2 or fewer resources.

Written Expression and Formatting: Paragraph

Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, low logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%-79% of the time.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

Written Expression and Formatting: English Writing Standards

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting:

The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, indentations, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains many (≥5) APA format errors.

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6050 AGENDA COMPARISON GRID AND FACT SHEET

Grading Rubric

Performance Category 100% or highest level of performance

100%

16 points

Very good or high level of performance

88%

14 points

Acceptable level of performance

81%

13 points

Inadequate demonstration of expectations

68%

11 points

Deficient level of performance

56%

9 points

 

Failing level

of performance

55% or less

0 points

 Total Points Possible= 50           16 Points    14 Points 13 Points        11 Points           9 Points          0 Points
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
 16 Points  14 Points  13 Points 11 Points 9 Points  0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge

Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
   10 Points 9 Points  6 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue

Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)

The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)

Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.

Demonstrated all of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 3 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 2 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
  8 Points 7 Points  6 Points         5 Points          4 Points  0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.

The following was present:

  • 0-3 errors in APA format

AND

  • Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND

  • Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.
The following was present:

  • 4-6 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.
The following was present:

  • 7-9 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.
 

The following was present:

  • 10- 12 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.
 

The following was present:

  • 13 – 15 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.

AND/OR

  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.
The following was present:

  • 16 to greater errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style does not facilitate communication
  0 Points Deducted 5 Points Lost
Participation

Requirements

Demonstrated the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
Failed to demonstrate the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
  0 Points Lost 5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements Demonstrated all of the following:

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Demonstrates one or less of the following.

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Also Check Out: NURS 6050 ADVOCATING FOR THE NURSING ROLE IN PROGRAM DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION