Sample Answer for NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library Database Included After Question
Where can you find evidence to inform your thoughts and scholarly writing? Throughout your degree program, you will use research literature to explore ideas, guide your thinking, and gain new insights. As you search the research literature, it is important to use resources that are peer-reviewed and from scholarly journals. You may already have some favorite online resources and databases that you use or have found useful in the past. For this Discussion, you explore databases available through the Walden Library.
To Prepare:
- Review the information presented in the Learning Resources for using the Walden Library, searching the databases, and evaluating online resources.
- Begin searching for a peer-reviewed article that pertains to your practice area and interests you.
By Day 3 of Week 6
Post the following:
Using proper APA formatting, cite the peer-reviewed article you selected that pertains to your practice area and is of particular interest to you and identify the database that you used to search for the article. Explain any difficulties you experienced while searching for this article. Would this database be useful to your colleagues? Explain why or why not. Would you recommend this database? Explain why or why not.
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library Database
Title: NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library Database
NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library Database
Peer-Reviewed Article Citation
Stapleton, H. J. (2021). COVID-19 changes to Post Anaesthesia Care Unit nursing practices. Journal of Perioperative Nursing, 34(2), e-19-e-21. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.26550/2209-1092.1113
For the purposes of this discussion, I chose an article that was related to COVID-19 because as a nurse actively working in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) through this pandemic, I can honestly say that standards of care are continually changing and evolving. There is no doubt that this pandemic has greatly affected our day-to-day work responsibilities and job duties. I believe that it is important to explore changes in care due to COVID-19 and how it affects nurses and their provision of care, specifically in the PACU.
Searching Databases
As a current graduate student who has previously obtained a master’s degree from Walden University, I did not find much difficulty when searching for this article. Throughout the years, I have learned many tips and tricks to make it easy to narrow a search so that I find articles specific to my topic of interest. For example, in order to find this article, I searched the CINAHL database only as it contains literature relevant to nursing and allied health (Stillwell et al., 2010). This is helpful since I was looking for an article related to an area of interest in nursing. In addition, I was able to use Boolean phrases to enhance my search. For instance, I typed “pacu AND nursing” in the search bar when navigating through the Walden Library. This populated articles related to not only issues in the PACU, but also included those issues that involved the field of nursing (Walden University Library, n.d-b).
CINAHL Database
This database would be useful to my colleagues due to the fact that it contains journals especially useful for the nursing profession. In addition, the database yields articles that are scholarly academic journals. Scholarly journals are those written by academics for those in academia. These articles are written specifically to research gaps in knowledge of a particular topic with the goal of advancing the scholarship in that area. I would recommend this database because it is easy to navigate and there are multiple ways to refine search criteria to find relevant articles pertaining to a specific area of interest. Articles in this database also include a background/literature review, clear and concise methodology, and cited sources. This provides the reader with a clear understanding of what is being studied, how the study was conducted, and where current information was obtained (Walden University Library, n.d.-b). Therefore, the reader has increased confidence that a particular article was written without opinion or bias, and the information within is also supported by experts in the field.
References
Stillwell, S. , Fineout-Overholt, E. , Melnyk, B. & Williamson, K. (2010). Evidence-Based Practice, Step by Step: Searching for the Evidence. AJN, American Journal of Nursing, 110 (5), 41-47. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000372071.24134.7e.
Walden University Library. (n.d.-a). Evaluating resources: Journals. Retrieved October 4, 2019, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/resource-types/journals
Walden University Library. (n.d.-b). Keyword searching: Finding articles on your topic: Boolean terms. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/keyword/boolean
Where can you look for evidence to support your ideas and scholarly writing? You will use research literature to explore ideas, guide your thinking, and gain new insights throughout your degree program. It is critical to use peer-reviewed and scholarly journal resources when searching the research literature. You may already have some favorite online resources and databases that you use or have previously found useful. For this Discussion, you will look into the databases available at the Walden Library.
Note: Unless otherwise noted, initial postings to Discussions are due on or before Day 3, and response postings are due on or before Day 6. You are required to participate in the Discussion on at least three different days (a different day for main post and each response). It is important to adhere to the weekly time frame to allow others ample time to respond to your posting. In addition, you are expected to respond to questions directed toward your own initial posting in a timely manner.
To Prepare:
- Review the information presented in the Learning Resources for using the Walden Library, searching the databases, and evaluating online resources.
- Begin searching for a peer-reviewed article that pertains to your practice area and interests you.
By Day 3 of Week 4
Post the following:
Using proper APA formatting, cite the peer-reviewed article you selected that pertains to your practice area and is of particular interest to you and identify the database that you used to search for the article. Explain any difficulties you experienced while searching for this article. Would this database be useful to your colleagues? Explain why or why not. Would you recommend this database? Explain why or why not.
Hi Irene, I agree with your post that technology is moving at an alarming speed in healthcare. It is, therefore, a good idea to research technology in the nursing practice. From my experience, the Walden University library indeed directs a person to a database organized from A-Z with the 15 best nursing databases (Walden University Library, 2019). The secret to using online databases is having keywords that help to locate relevant articles and journals accurately. In most cases, there are challenges such as the one you faced when trying to open the full text. Walden University, however, offers a platform and guidance on how to access whole test sources Walden University Library. (N.d). Therefore, the Walden University Database is a valuable online source for journals, scholarly articles, and periodicals related to nursing. There is a variety of unlimited sources of information with different years of publication. Additionally, the journals and articles from this database are reliable, credible, and unbiased. Interestingly, the database has a filtering option depending on an individual’s preference.
By Day 6 of Week 6
Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts by offering suggestions/strategies for working with this database from your own experience, or offering ideas for using alternative resources.
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 4 Discussion Rubric
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library Database
Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 4
To participate in this Discussion:
Week 4 Discussion
Module 3 (Weeks 4–5): Scholarship and Nursing Practice
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Your Toolbox for Success [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Scholarship [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Walden Journey to a Masters in Nursing: Scholarship [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Analyze research databases for identifying peer-reviewed articles
Analyze peer-reviewed research
Justify the use of peer-reviewed research in professional practice
Analyze strategies for finding peer-reviewed research
Due By
Assignment
Week 4, Days 1–4
Read the Learning Resources.
Begin to compose Part 3 of your Assignment.
Week 4, Days 1–2
Read the Learning Resources.
Compose your initial Discussion post.
Week 4, Day 3
Deadline to post your initial Discussion post.
Begin to compose Part 3 of your Assignment.
Week 4, Days 4–5
Review peer Discussion posts.
Compose your peer Discussion responses. (Make sure to participate in the Discussion on three different days.)
Continue to compose Part 3 of your Assignment.
Week 4, Day 6
Last day to post Discussion responses.
Week 5, Days 1–6
Continue to compose Part 3 of your Assignment.
Week 5, Day 7
Deadline to submit Part 3 of your Assignment.
Learning Resources
Required Readings
Al-Jundi, A., & Sakka, S. (2017). Critical appraisal of clinical research. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR, 11(5), JE01–JE05. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/26047.9942
Shellenbarger, T. (2016). Simplifying synthesis. Nurse Author & Editor, 26(3). Retrieved from http://naepub.com/reporting-research/2016-26-3-3/
Walden University Library. (n.d.). Databases A-Z: Nursing. Retrieved October 4, 2019 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981
Walden University Library. (n.d.). Evaluating resources: Journals. Retrieved October 4, 2019, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/resource-types/journals
Walden University Library. (n.d.). Instructional media: Fundamentals of library research. Retrieved October 4, 2019 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/instructionalmedia/researchfundamentals
Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Retrieved November 14, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/home
Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Common assignments: Synthesizing your sources. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/literaturereview/synthesizing
Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Scholarly writing: Overview. Retrieved November 14, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/scholarly
Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Webinars: Technical information. Retrieved November 14, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/webinars/technical
Document: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template (Word document)
Document: Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Tips for success (PDF)
Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Purpose, Audience, and Evidence [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Tips for Success [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6003_Module03_Week04_Discussion_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting
Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Post: Timeliness
Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3.
First Response
Points Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited.
Second Response
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited.
Participation
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6003_Module03_Week04_Discussion_Rubric
A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library Database
Title: NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library Database
I enjoyed reading your post and I can relate to a lot of what you said in it. I feel that more then ever with the amount of research, journals, articles and opinions that will be published in regard to COVID we need to step back and critically analyze whether the article or data is scholarly. According to Laureate Education “it is important for nurses to conduct research; we are at the bedside and we see problems that need to be addressed that perhaps others would not see” (2018). This is critical when we begin to analyze the data that is being published by multiple parties. We are in a good position to do our own research and start the process of changing what does not work for these patients and we can accomplish this with credible data and peer review research ourselves. As bedside nurses we are in a crucial role to change health care and get our findings out to other organizations that can benefit from what we have learned.
I also agree with you that research poses challenges when using the online libraries. I also struggled with it. When I looked up education and COVID for example I was presented with so much information that it was overwhelming and when I researched it more I found a lot of the information was not scholarly but public press releases and opinions without much data to them. When I was evaluating the articles and journals I relied on the Walden Library’s page on Evaluating Resources for some key points to check for the credibility of the publication. I found a lot of trade publications which according to the library “are written by staff writers or practitioners in a given trade or profession. The intent is to share industry news, trends and advances”( Walden Library, n.d.). Some of the articles are peer reviewed but a majority do not get peer reviewed. In the future I am going to use your recommendation to use the “Advanced Search” tab and see if I cannot rein in some of the topics that come up when I do a complete search. This may help with some of my frustration and time it takes me to research articles. Thank you.
References
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Walden Journey to a Masters in Nursing: Scholarship [Video file]. Baltimore, MD; Author.
Walden University Library,. (n.d.). Evaluating resources: Journals. Retrieved October 4th, 2019 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/resource-types/journals
A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library Database
Title: NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library Database
Scholastic writing is constantly being improved as a vast array of resources are introduced and made available to all students. The basics of sentence construction was learned in the early stages of our education, and as we all advanced in our education, the depth and quality of writing has been enhanced. Research has become the main stay of all publications and has given each article the authority to publish relevant information. An effective and useful approach to scholarly writing is to avoid making assumptions and provide objective information derived from published research articles (Laureate Education, 2018). It is easy for one to present personal opinion, but the information must always be supported by cited information to make the information credible. In the same article, it was also emphasized that the writer must know the audience to be able to provide the appropriate scholarly voice to convey the message for the target audience. I find this very important because in my personal reading, I am always attracted by articles that speak to me and it makes it easier for me to understand the content.
Peer reviewed article. To analyze the relevance of scholastic writing, I searched a peer-reviewed article in the Walden University database. The Walden University library contains a wide list of resources organized in a way that you can search articles using filters to isolate and identify the specific topic of interest (Walden University Library, n.d.). The preparatory stage of writing a paper takes the longest time for me because I have to create a plan and skeletal format for my essay. After creating a framework, I utilized the online links provided within our course to access the related resources for the assignment. The Walden University library is formatted in a way that will allow users to navigate through the system easily. I did not have any difficulty looking choosing a peer reviewed article at all. The title of the article I chose is “Current Status of Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Therapeutics, and Vaccines for Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 [COVID-19]” (Ahn, et al, 2020). I found this article in the Walden University library using the filters Nursing category, and further isolated the topics using the peer reviewed database. This gave me the option to choose among a list of articles that caught my interest. There are a lot of information circulating in social media about corona virus and I always try to validate the information by reading scholastic articles. The topic about corona virus is current and relevant not just to the nursing profession but to everyone because of the global effects it has brought. Reflecting on the clarity of the topic presented by the article is critical in appraising research papers (Smith, 2009). The peer reviewed article provided a smooth flow of information from the presentation of facts and data gathered to the conclusions derived from the findings. Although the findings did not indicate the discovery of an approved vaccine, it has provided relevant information regarding the improved approaches to case identification and its management.
Database. Walden University provides a vast array of resources for students from online links, easy access to scholarly articles, books, and readily available personnel to guide students along the way (Laureate Education, 2018). The online library is a one stop shop for students providing ease of use with its simple format. I did not experience any difficulty utilizing the database and I highly recommend the use of this resource to all students. The wide range of topics contained in the database makes this link a universal resource for anyone looking to find scholastic articles.
References
Ahn DG, Shin HJ, Kim MH, Lee S, Kim HS, Myoung J, Kim BT, Kim SJ. Current Status of Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Therapeutics, and Vaccines for Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020 Mar 28;30(3):313-324. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2003.03011. PMID: 32238757.
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Purpose, Audience, and Evidence [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Tips for Success [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Smith, T. (2009). Critical appraisal of quantitative and qualitative research literature. Austrian Institute of Radiography, 56(3), 6–10. Retrieved from http://www.minnisjournals.com.au/articles/radiographer%20smith%20dec%2009.pdf
Walden University Library. (n.d.). Evaluating resources: Journals. Retrieved October 4, 2019, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/resource-types/journals
You’ve already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Main Posting |
|
|||||
|
Main Post: Timeliness |
|
|||||
|
First Response |
|
|||||
|
Second Response |
|
|||||
|
Participation |
|
|||||
|
Total Points: 100
|
||||||