NUR 590 Discussion: Incorrect Framework Creating bias in research

Sample Answer for NUR 590 Discussion: Incorrect Framework Creating bias in research Included After Question

NUR 590 Discussion Incorrect Framework Creating bias in research

Topic 3 DQ 1

Upcoming

Assessment Description

Discuss the significance of frameworks or models in guiding research or evidence-based practice projects. How can choosing an incorrect framework or model create bias in research?

Objectives:

Apply a change model or framework to the evidence-based practice project proposal.
Describe the relationship between bias and a framework or model.

Assessments

Collapse All

Topic 3 DQ 2

GO TO DISCUSSION

Start Date

Aug 26, 2021 12:00 AM

Due Date

Aug 30, 2021 11:59 PM

Points

Status

Upcoming

Assessment Description

Review the different models and frameworks that can be used to facilitate change. Compare two and explain which is best for your evidence-based practice proposal and why. Provide rationale.

Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project: Framework or Model for Change

Benchmark

SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT

Requires LopesWrite

Start Date

Aug 26, 2021 12:00 AM

Due Date

Sep 01, 2021 11:59 PM

Points

100

NUR 590 Discussion: Incorrect Framework Creating bias in research Rubric

View Rubric

Status

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 590 Discussion: Incorrect Framework Creating bias in research

Upcoming

Assessment Description

Applying a model or framework for change ensures that a process is in place to guide the efforts for change. In 500-750 words, discuss the model or framework you will use to implement your evidence-based practice proposal project. You will use the model or framework you select in the Topic 8 assignment, during which you will synthesize the various aspects of your project into a final paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.

Include the following:

Identify the selected model or framework for change and discuss its relevance to your project.
Discuss each of the stages in the change model/framework.
Describe how you would apply each stage of the model or theoretical framework in your proposed implementation.
Create a concept map for the conceptual model or framework you selected to illustrate how it will be applied to your project. Attach this as an appendix at the end of your paper.

Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.

You are required to cite minimum of four peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Complete the “APA Writing Checklist” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as an appendix at the end of your paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Lopes Write. A link to the Lopes Write technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

MBA-MSN; MSN-Nursing Education; MSN Acute Care Nurse Practitioner-Adult-Gerontology; MSN Family Nurse Practitioner; MSN-Health Informatics; MSN-Health Care Quality and Patient Safety; MSN-Leadership in Health Care Systems; MSN-Public Health Nursing

1.2 Apply theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level.

Week 3 Participation

GO TO DISCUSSION

Start Date

Aug 26, 2021 12:00 AM

Due Date

Sep 01, 2021 11:59 PM

Points

Status

Upcoming

Assessment Description

There is no description for this assessment.

Resources

Collapse All

Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession

Read Chapter 6 in Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession.

View Resource

Evidence Based Medicine: Levels of Evidence

Read “Evidence Based Medicine: Levels of Evidence,” by the University of Illinois/Chicago’s Library of the Health Sciences at Peo

A Test of the ARCC Model Improves Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice, Healthcare Culture, and Patient Outcomes

Read “A Test of the ARCC Model Improves Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice, Healthcare Culture, and Patient Outcomes,” by

Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice: Revisions and Validation

Read “Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice: Revisions and Validation,” by Buckwalter et al., from Worldviews on Evidence-Bas

Use of Evidence-Based Practice Models and Research Findings in Magnet-Designed Hospitals Across the United States: National Survey Results

Read “Use of Evidence-Based Practice Models and Research Findings in Magnet-Designed Hospitals Across the United States: National Sur

Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare : A Guide to Best Practice

Read Chapter 14 and review Chapter15 in Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice.

View Resource

Critical Appraisal Tools

Read “Critical Appraisal Tools,” located on the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (CEBM) website.

https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/ebm-tools/critical-appraisal-tools

Study Designs

Review “Study Designs,” located on the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (CEBM) website.

https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/ebm-tools/study-designs

Worksheet for Using Practice Guidelines

Study “Worksheet for Using Practice Guidelines,” from the “Evidence Based Medicine Toolkit,” by Buckingham, Fisher, and S

Guidelines and Measures

Study “Guidelines and Measures,” located on the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality website.

https://www.ahrq.gov/gam/index.html

Star Model

Explore the Star Model resources, located on the UT Health San Antonio School of Nursing website.

https://www.uthscsa.edu/academics/nursing/star-model

Nursing Best Practice Guidelines

Investigate the Nursing Best Practice Guidelines page of the Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO) website.

http://www.rnao.org/Page.asp?PageID=861&SiteNodeID=133

Updating the Stetler Model of Research Utilization to Facilitate Evidence-Based Practice

Read “Updating the Stetler Model of Research Utilization to Facilitate Evidence-Based Practice,” by Stetler, by Nursing Outlo

NUR 590 Discussion: Incorrect Framework Creating bias in research Grading Rubric Guidelines DQ

Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable	No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions. Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Application of Course Knowledge – Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources; Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources. Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content	Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson. Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson	Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post. Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life	Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category	5	4	3	2	0
Interactive Dialogue Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days. *(5 points possible per graded thread)*	Exceeds minimum post requirements Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days. Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days Replies to a question posed by a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days. The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty	Has only one post for the week Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments	Does not post to the thread No connections are made to the topic
	Minus 1 Point	Minus 2 Point	Minus 3 Point	Minus 4 Point	Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted. Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition	2-3 errors in APA format. Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors. Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.	4-5 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is somewhat focused.	6-7 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.	8-10 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.	Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format. Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style does not facilitate communication. The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
	0 points lost				-5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements *per discussion thread*	The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.				The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement *per discussion thread*	The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.				The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NUR 590 Discussion: Incorrect Framework Creating bias in research

Title: NUR 590 Discussion: Incorrect Framework Creating bias in research

The levels of evidence that are also referred to as the hierarchy of evidence plays a role of providing guidance when carrying out research studies to facilitate the possibility of delivery of reliable answers to specific clinical questions. There are multiple hierarchies of evidence in intervention questions with the suitability of each level depending on research or clinical question that forms the focus of the study (Tejada et al., 2020). When looking for evidence-based information, it is imperative to select from the highest hierarchy possible, which often consist of meta-analysis or systematic reviews.

There are various levels of evidence that are found within research and practice. They consist of meta-analysis which applies quantitative methods in the appraisal of result, systematic reviews which involves systematic search and analysis of the medical research by the authors in regard to a particular topic. The other level is randomized control trials, which involves selection and inclusion of randomized groups of patient into control and experiment group. Case-control studies on the other hand is a level of evidence that requires involvement of patients with outcome of interest and control patients with divergent outcome with the primary focus being determination of exposure of interest. Expert opinion is also another level of evidence that utilizes generalized information regarding a condition in question from handbooks, textbooks, and encyclopedias. The other level of evidence is lab studies that offer information after conducting laboratory tests. Essentially, levels of evidence are important in research and practice in providing guidance in conducting research by assisting researchers to determine the appropriate evidence to rely on (Tejada et al., 2020). However, researchers should be cognizant of factors such as quality of research due to their potential in influencing the value of the existing evidence.

References

Tejada, S., Campogiani, L., Ferreira-Coimbra, J., Blot, S., & Rello, J. (2020). Levels of evidence supporting clinical practice guidelines on invasive aspergillosis. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 39(5), 903-913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03794-7