NUR 550 Translational Research Framework and Legal/ Ethical Considerations

Sample Answer for NUR 550 Translational Research Framework and Legal/ Ethical Considerations Included After Question

NUR 550 Translational Research Framework and Legal/ Ethical Considerations

All healthcare providers must act in an ethical manner.  Ethics should be at the core of everything we do and be a part of every decision that we make while keeping in mind the best interests of the patient (DeNisco, 2021).  Ethics in translational research can be tricky due to the nature of what is being researched.  Translational research is research that studies how evidence-based interventions are translated to real-world clinical settings (Melnyk, 2019).  However, to bring that research into the real-world multiple phases of testing must take place.  At any point during the different phases of translational research, harm can be done to either animals or humans.  This is where ethics in translational research can become tricky.  

While the intent of any translational research study is to have a good outcome that is not always the case.  The researchers must weigh the risks and benefits to the study participants versus the risks and benefits to the greater good of all people.  Legal and ethical guidelines are standard practice for all research studies and must be followed by all team members.  I think that as part of a translational research team the most important thing to ensure that all team members are following the proper protocols, and legal and ethical guidelines.   

 

References 

DeNisco, S. M. (Ed.). (2021). Advanced practice nursing: Essential knowledge for the profession (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN-13: 978128417612 

 

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Wolters Kluwer. ISBN-13: 9781496384539 

Topic 3 DQ 1

Description:

Discuss the ethical guidelines that would need to be implemented when conducting translational research. What are the ethical and legal considerations related to translating research into practice? Discuss what steps you would take as a member of a translational research team in order to establish ethical guidelines for conducting translational research.

Topic 3 DQ 2

Description:

Discuss the role of the Institutional Review Board. Discuss ethical research considerations specific to population health. How are respect for the persons, potential benefits and burdens of the research, and justice kept in balance? Provide an example.
Topic 3 Participation
Description:
NA
Topic 3: Translational Research Framework and Legal and Ethical Considerations
Description
Objectives:

1. Discuss ethical guidelines for conducting translational research.
2. Examine ethical considerations related to translating research into practice .
3. Examine legal considerations related to translating research into practice.
4. Discuss ethical research considerations specific to population health.
Study Materials
Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession
Description:
Read Chapter 26 in Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession.

NUR 550 Translational Research Framework and Legal Ethical Considerations
NUR 550 Translational Research Framework and Legal Ethical Considerations

Population Health: Creating a Culture of Wellness
Description:
Read Chapter 10 in Population Health: Creating a Culture of Wellness.
A Few Ethical Issues in Translation Research for Gene and Cell Therapy
Description:
Read “A Few Ethical Issues in Translation Research for Gene and Cell Therapy,” by Riva and Petrini, from Journal of Translational Medicine (2019).
The Underappreciated and Misunderstood PICOT Question: A Critical Step in EBP Process.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 550 Translational Research Framework and Legal/ Ethical Considerations

Description:
Read “The Underappreciated and Misunderstood PICOT Question: A Critical Step in EBP Process,” by Gallagher-Ford and Melnyk, from Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing (2019).
Life After PICOT: Taking the Next Step in a Clinical Inquiry Project
Description:
Read “Life After PICOT: Taking the Next Step in a Clinical Inquiry Project,” by Granger, from AACN Advanced Critical Care (2020).
The Belmont Report
Description:
Read “The Belmont Report,” by The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, located on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services website (1979).
PICO: A Model for Evidence-Based Research
Description:
View “PICO: A Model for Evidence-Based Research,” by Binghamton University Libraries, located on YouTube (2017).
What is Evidence-Based Practice?
Description:
View “What is Evidence-Based Practice?” by Lippincott NursingCenter.com, located on YouTube (2016).
Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NUR-550 NUR-550-O503 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: PICOT 75.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%) Satisfactory (88.00%) Blank (92.00%) Blank (100.00%)
Content 100.0%
Population (Revision) 7.0% The population is not described, or the required revisions were not made for the population description. NA Revisions were made accordingly for the population description, but some information or detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. NA The population is thoroughly and accurately described. No revision was needed.
Intervention (Revision) 8.0% The proposed intervention is not described, or the required revisions were not made for the described intervention. NA Revisions were made accordingly for the proposed intervention, but some information or detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. NA The proposed intervention is clearly described and relevant to the nursing practice problem and population. No revision was needed.
Comparison 10.0% A description of the comparison information is not included. A description of the comparison information is incomplete or incorrect. A description of the comparison information is included but lacks evidence and measurable outcomes. A description of the comparison information is complete and includes sufficient evidence and measurable outcomes. A description of the comparison information is extremely thorough with substantial evidence and measurable outcomes.
Outcome 10.0% A description of the outcome is not included. A description of the outcome is not included. A description of the outcome is included but lacks evidence. A description of the outcome is complete and includes sufficient evidence. A description of the outcome is extremely thorough with substantial evidence
Timeline 10.0% A description of the timeline is not included. A description of the timeline is incomplete or incorrect. A description of the timeline is included but lacks evidence. A description of the timelines is complete and includes sufficient evidence. A description of the timeline is extremely thorough with substantial evidence.
PICOT 20.0% The PICOT statement is omitted. The PICOT statement is incomplete. The PICOT statement is presented but there some inaccuracies. The PICOT statement is presented. Some detail is needed. The PICOT statement concisely and accurately describes the problem.
Problem Statement 20.0% A problem statement is not included. The problem statement is incomplete. The problem statement is generally presented. There are some inaccuracies. More support is needed to justify or rationalize the problem. The problem statement is presented. Adequate support is provided to justify or rationalize the problem. The problem statement concisely describes the issue using strong support to rationalize and justify the problem.
Required Sources 5.0% Sources are not included. Number of required sources is only partially met. Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Number of required resources is met. Sources are current and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Lopes Write Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation

Welcome to class

Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to

I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.

Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.

If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.

Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.

Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.

I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

Hi Class,

Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.

Contact me if you have any questions.

Important information on Writing a Discussion Question

  • Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
  • There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
  • Include in-text citations in your response
  • Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
  • Follow APA-7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor

  • A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
  • Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
  • Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
  • Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
  • Follow APA 7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
  • Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
  • Here are some helpful links
  • Student paper example
  • Citing Sources
  • The Writing Center is a great resource

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NUR 550 Translational Research Framework and Legal/ Ethical Considerations

Title: NUR 550 Translational Research Framework and Legal/ Ethical Considerations

As with any research or experiments conducted on the human body, translational research and studies can pose many ethical concerns that one should be aware of before implementation. Ensuring informed consent is the responsibility of any researcher, especially those in the T1 and T2 phase of translational research studies (Mandal, Ponnambath, & Parija, 2017) Legal implications may even arise if participants are not well informed of the process and all the risks/benefits that may exist.  By ensuring patients are giving their completely informed consent, researchers can eliminate any misconceptions participants may have about the therapeutic benefits of the study that may lead them to participate when they might not have otherwise (Mandal, Ponnambath, & Parija, 2017). Conflicts of interest are another ethical concern in translational research, especially if researchers have anything to gain financially from the study. Social injustice is another ethical concern, especially dealing with population health issues. One example of this might be a resource-rich country conducting a study in a resource-poor country, but the benefits to the health of the population in the resource-poor country might be minimal, or products being studied might be too expensive for participants or the rest of the population to even be able to afford after the study has concluded (Mandal, Ponnambath, & Parija, 2017). This is one area I think it’s important to be mindful of as researchers design studies and where to conduct them. If I were to design a research study and assemble a team, I would ensure that the study was conducted with the goal of improving a problem that is a burden to the health of the population included in the study, and that the interventions or products being developed would actually be affordable to those within that population. I feel this approach would be best to help improve the health of the population in the study. 

References: 

Mandal, J., Ponnambath, D., & Parija, S. (2017). Ethics of translational medical research. Tropical Parasitilogy, 7(2), 62-64. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5652056/