NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Evaluation of Literature Table Essay

NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Evaluation of Literature Table Essay

Sample Answer for NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Evaluation of Literature Table Essay Included After Question

Description:

The purpose of this assignment is to provide research evidence in support of the PICOT you developed for your selected topic.

Conduct a search for 10 peer-reviewed, translational research articles published within the last 5 years that demonstrate support for your PICOT. You may include previous research articles from assignments completed in this course. Use the “Literature Evaluation Table” provided to evaluate the articles and explain how the research supports your PICOT.

Once your instructor returns this assignment, review the feedback and make any revisions necessary. If you are directed by your instructor to select different articles in order to meet the assignment criteria or to better support your PICOT, make these changes accordingly. You will use the literature evaluated in this assignment for all subsequent assignments you develop as part of your evidence-based practice project proposal in this course and in NUR-590, during which you will synthesize all of the sections into a final written paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.

Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Evaluation of Literature Table Essay

Title: NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Evaluation of Literature Table Essay

Learner Name:

PICOT:

Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are considered one of the most prevalent hospital acquired infections, especially among hospitalized patients in medical-surgical units. CAUTIs account for about 40% of the hospital acquired infections in the world and consider a public health issue in the U.S. health system. Over 30 million catheters are uses in hospitals and other healthcare settings each year (Gauhar et al., 2020). The use of bundled care intervention is considered one of the most effective ways for nurses and other providers to reduce and prevent the occurrence of CAUTIs among hospitalized patients in medical-surgical settings (Mangal et al., 2021). The purpose of this literature evaluation table is to identify and discuss the different components of the research study articles on the use of care bundle to reduce and prevent the occurrence of CAUTI in medical-surgical units. PICOT Question Among patients requiring urinary catheterization in the medical and surgical ward (P), does the use of bundle care (I) as compared to usual care (C) result in at least 50% reduction in CAUTIs (O) within eight months? (T).

 

 

Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article	Article Title and Year Published	Research Questions/ Hypothesis, and Purpose/Aim of Study	Design (Quantitative, Qualitative, or other)	Setting/Sample	Methods: Intervention/ Instruments	Analysis/Data Collection	Outcomes/Key Findings	Recommendations	Explanation of How the Article Supports Your Proposed EBP Practice Project Proposal
Soundaram, G. V., Sundaramurthy, R., Jeyashree, K., Ganesan, V., Arunagiri, R., & Charles, J. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine: Peer-reviewed, Official Publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 24(7), 544. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23473	Impact of care bundle implementation on incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infection: a comparative study in the intensive care units of a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India 2020	The aim of this study was to assess the effects of catheter care bundle in reducing the incidence of CAUTIs.	The quantitative study used a prospective intervention of before-and-after trial among the selected patients and the setting.	The setting for the study was critical care units in the hospital comprising of medical intensive care unit, surgical intensive care unit and other two ICUs.	The intervention was a prospective before-and-after trial in the setting to know the incidence rates.	The researchers analyzed data using device utilization ratio and average catheter days for each patient.	The results of the study show that there was a statistical significant reduction in the incidence of CAUTIs of about 60% on the catheter days (1000). The article is categorical that the holistic approach led to a reduction in the incidence of CAUTI in the ICUs in the facility.	The study recommends the implementation of care bundle and evaluation of adherence to every aspect as part of routine infection control within facilities.	The article is important to the EBP proposed project because it supports the implementation of diverse bundled care to reduce CAUTIs in critical care settings.
Van Decker, S. G., Bosch, N., & Murphy, J. BMJ Open Quality, 10(4), e001534. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001534	Catheter-associated urinary tract infection reduction in critical care units: a bundled care model 2021	The study’s hypothesis is that CAUTIs represent about 9% of all healthcare associated infections (HAIs) yet about 70% of these are preventable. The aim of the study was to discuss the implementation of an initiative at Boston Medical Center (BMC) to reduce CAUTI rates in the intensive care units.	The researchers used a plan-do-study-act (PDSA) approach to evaluate CAUTI rates in the facility.	The setting was the ICUs at Boston Medical Center	The interventions based on the PDSA model were five. The staff also conducted daily rounds and included foley catheter utilization.	The study analyzed data from the different interventions using statistical tools to ascertain the rates of decline in CAUTIs.	The implementation of the interventions led to a reduction of CAUTIs in the ICUs at the facility by over 83% as well as the reduction of 33% in the utilization of indwelling foley catheter.	The study recommends the use of these interventions in different areas, especially the ICUs to reduce CAUTIs and their associated costs.	The study is critical to the EBP proposed project as it shows the efficacy of the bundled care interventions in reducing CAUTIs in critical care units like the ICUs.
Shadle, H. N., Sabol, V., Smith, A., Stafford, H., Thompson, J. A., & Bowers, M. Critical Care Nurse, 41(2), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2021934	A bundle-based approach to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in the intensive care unit. 2021	In this study, the researchers hypothesize that CAUTs are among the most prevalent healthcare associated infections and occur mostly in intensive care units. These infections have negative effects on patient outcomes and the health care costs.	The study uses a pre-post design consisting of two-consecutive 4-month periods.	The sample population comprises of critically ill patients over 18 years admitted in the ICU.	The intervention was a set of bundled approaches comprising od staff education, use of electronic daily checklist, and nurse-focused removal protocol among indwelling urinary catheters.	The study analyzed data using mixed statistics comprising of independent samples T tests and Fisher exact tests.	The findings show that the bundled care approach reduces CAUTIs as there were no catheter-associated urinary tract infections documented during the time.	The study suggests that implementation of bundled care interventions reduces the prevalence of CAUTIs in healthcare settings.	The article is important to the EBP propose project as it demonstrates that providers and organizations can reduce CAUTIs through effective implementation of different approaches or strategies.
Wanat, M., Borek, A. J., Atkins, L., Sallis, A., Ashiru-Oredope, D., Beech, E., … & Tonkin-Crine, S. Antibiotics, 9(7), 419. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics9070419	Optimising interventions for catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) in primary, secondary and care home settings 2020	In this study, the researchers focused on identifying the optimization of national interventions to reduce CAUTIs.	The researchers conducted a multi-method comprising of rapid review of research, behavioral analysis, and stakeholder focus group on the interventions to minimize and prevent the occurrence of CAUTIs.	The study sampled different studies based on its approach and in various settings on the effects of national interventions to reduce CAUTIs.	The researchers identified settled on seven interventions as the most critical in addressing CAUTIs through optimization at the national level.	The analysis of the data was based on the efficacy of the selected interventions in different settings.	The article asserts that through combing the research evidence, they identified the effects of the national interventions to reduce CAUTI could be enhanced.	The study recommends the implementation of the seven prioritized components to reduce CAUTIs in healthcare facilities across different systems.	The article is important to the EBP proposed project as it shows the effectiveness of the interventions to reduce and prevent CAUTIs.
Alex, J., Ferguson, C., Ramjan, L. M., Montayre, J., Lombardo, L., & Salamonson, Y. Collegian, 29(3), 405-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2021.08.007	Bundle-of-care interventions to improve self-management of patients with urinary catheters: Study protocol. 2022	The aim of the study was to co-design, develop and assess a bundle-of-care intervention to enhance the self-management of catheter, reduce catheter-associated complications, and improved quality of life.	The study used mixed methods design based on the principles of Appreciative Inquiry, micro-and spaced-learning pedagogies.	The study’s setting was one of the most populated and fastest growing local health district (LHD) in New South Wales, Australia. The study recruited patients over 18 years and living with IDC.	The researchers used a co-designed care bundle aimed at supporting patients and nurses to enhance catheter care in acute and community settings.	The researchers used different tools to analyze the resultant data from the study on the different aspect of catheter self-management and increased self-efficacy.	The findings show that the bundled care interventions can reduce CAUTIs in different care settings; both acute and community.	The researchers recommend the implementation of these interventions. The article recommends the use of these aspects to reduce CAUTIs.	The article supports the EBP proposed project as it shows the effectiveness of using the care bundles as suggested in the PICOT as an intervention to reduce CAUTIs.
Yu, S., Marshall, A. P., Li, J., & Lin, F. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 26(3), e12834. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12834	Interventions and strategies to prevent catheter‐associated urinary tract infections with short‐term indwelling urinary catheters in hospitalized patients: An integrative review. 2020	The aim of the study is exploring interventions and strategies that can prevent CAUTIs in hospitalized patients who have temporary indwelling urinary catheters.	The researchers conducted an integrative review through a search undertaken in databases.	The study’s settings were multiple as they considered different settings and health populations based on the articles used in the integrative review.	Multiple interventions were conducted using evidence-based protocols and guidelines.	The researchers analyzed data based on the interventions that they used. The analysis focused on common themes among the different papers that they found appropriate to the project	The findings show that these interventions can reduce the occurrence and prevalence of CAUTIs in patients with short-term urinary catheters.	The study recommends the implementation of care bundle as an effective approach to reduce and prevent CAUTIs. The study recommends the need to understand effective combination of interventions that are appropriate.	The article supports the EBP proposed project as it shows that bundled care approach is effective in reducing and preventing CAUTIs in multiple settings involving diverse patient populations.
Fauziah, W., Rochana, N. & Juniarto, A. Z. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference of Indonesian National Nurses Association (ICINNA 2018), pages 123-131. DOI: 10.5220/0008205901230131	The Effect of Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) Bundle of Care: A Systematic Review 2019	The study aimed at determining the effects of CAUTI bundle of care in minimizing and preventing the occurrence of CAUTIs.	The study used a systematic review approach comprising of experimental studies.	The patient sample comprised of adults	The intervention as part of the inclusion criteria was the use of urinary catheter installed for a minimum 72 hours.	The researchers analyzed data from 171 articles with only six of them meeting the inclusion criteria. The researchers appraised the selected articles using the Critical Appraisal Skill Program (CASP)	The findings from the study show that using CAUTI bundle of care reduces and prevents the occurrence of CAUTIs in different settings.	The review recommends the implementation of the CAUTI bundled care as an effective approach to reducing and preventing CAUTIs in any setting.	The study shows that bundled care interventions reduce and prevent CAUTIs. Therefore, it supports the EBP proposed project by demonstrating that these interventions works and lead to improved care provision and patient safety.
Dehghanrad, F., Nobakht-e-Ghalati, Z., Zand, F., Gholamzadeh, S., Ghorbani, M., & Rosenthal, V. Electronic Journal of General Medicine, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/94099	Effect of instruction and implementation of a preventive urinary tract infection bundle on the incidence of catheter associated urinary tract infection in intensive care unit patients. 2019	The aim of this study is to identify the impact of instruction and implementing a bundle of care to reduce and prevent the incidence of CAUTIs among patients	The study uses a before-and-after quasi experiment.	The study sample involved 330 patients with 185 patients in the before trial and 145 after the intervention.	The researchers used the bundled care interventions comprising of compliance with CAUTI principles, urinary catheter utilization and indications of the outcomes.	The study analyzed data using the CDC/NHSN criteria in the before-and-after criteria.	The findings from the study shows that these interventions had an insignificant effect on reduction of CAUTIs among the sampled population. However, the level of noncompliance reduced after the interventions.	The researchers recommend more studies to effectively demonstrate the effects of their bundled care intervention comprising of instructions and compliance adherence.	The article is essential to the EBP proposed project as it shows that the intervention is effective based on the kind of strategies or approaches used by the healthcare organization.
Frödin, M., Ahlstrom, L., Gillespie, B. M., Rogmark, C., Nellgård, B., Wikström, E., & Erichsen Andersson, A. Journal of Infection Prevention, 23(2), 41-48.	Effectiveness of implementing a preventive urinary catheter care bundle in hip fracture patients 2022	The aim of the study was to describe incidence of urinary catheter-associated infection among the elderly patients who have hip fracture surgery upon the implementation of preventive care bundle.	The study used a longitudinal prospective approach based on before-and-after design.	The study sample entailed 2408 patients who had an acute hip fracture.	The intervention was bundled care model comprising of different strategies and approaches to reduce CAUTIs.	The researchers analyzed data based on the before-and-after approach within the implementation period.	The findings from the study are categorical that bundled interventions are effective in reducing urinary catheter-associated infections, including in frail elderly patients with hip fracture surgeries.	The researchers recommend partnerships and co-creation for effective implementation of strategies that promise to reduce hospital associated infections (HAIs), including CAUTIs.	The article is important to the EBP proposed project as it supports the suggested intervention of using bundled care interventions to reduce CAUTIs in medical –surgical settings.
Fritsch, P. F., Sutton, J., Roche, E., Berberi, V., Whidden, E., & Holder, C. American Journal of Infection Control, 47(6), S22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2019.04.035	Reinforcing a catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) bundle compliance decreases overall catheter days and CAUTIs 2019	The hypothesis for the study is that the primary risk factor for CAUTIs is longer duration for indwelling catheter use. Therefore, the study proposes minimizing their use where possible. The aim of the study was to reduce CAUTIs through reinforcement of bundle compliance and lower the use of indwelling catheters by suggesting more external ones.	Qualitative by introduction of a bundle device compliance form.	The setting was an inpatient female ward or unit.	The intervention was the introduction of a bundle device compliance forms with a daily goal on catheterization.	The researchers analyzed data through pre-and post-intervention outcomes within the period of implementation.	The findings show that the intervention led to a decline in the occurrence of CAUTIs by over 9% within the period and a drop of 7.5% in catheter days. The introduction of external catheters also reduced CAUTIs by over 59% and catheter days by 26.5%.	The authors recommend the implementation of bundle care approach to reduce CAUTIs as demonstrated by their findings.	The article is critical to the EBP proposed project as it shows that the use of care bundle is effective in reducing CAUTIs in any setting, including medical-surgical settings.

 

NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Evaluation of Literature Table Essay Conclusion

The evaluation table shows that the use of care bundled interventions leads to a reduction in the prevalence of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) in different settings. The review is critical to the EBP proposed project as it demonstrates the efficacy and effectiveness of the intervention. This means that healthcare providers like nurses can reduce CAUTIs when they work collaboratively to implement different interventions simultaneously to improve patient safety and quality of care (Schweiger et al., 2020). The evaluation of these articles affirms the need to implement evidence-based practice (EBP) to prevent and reduce occurrence of CAUTIs.

NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Evaluation of Literature Table Essay References

Gauhar, V., Castellani, D., Teoh, J. Y. C., Nedbal, C., Chiacchio, G., Gabrielson, A. T., … & Somani, B. K. (2022). Catheter-Associated Urinary Infections and Consequences of Using Coated versus Non-Coated Urethral

Catheters—Outcomes of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(15), 4463. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154463

Mangal, S., Pho, A., Arcia, A., & Carter, E. (2021). Patient and family engagement in catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) prevention: A systematic review. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and

Patient Safety, 47(9), 591-603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.05.009

Schweiger, A., Kuster, S. P., Maag, J., Züllig, S., Bertschy, S., Bortolin, E., … & Marschall, J. (2020). Impact of an evidence-based intervention on urinary catheter utilization, associated process indicators, and infectious and

non-infectious outcomes. Journal of hospital infection, 106(2), 364-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2020.07.002

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Evaluation of Literature Table Essay

Topic 5 DQ 1

Description:

Identify either a safety or quality improvement initiative related to improving population health. Explain how translational research can influence the development of the initiative. Include a specific example to support your response.

Topic 5 DQ 2

Description:

Identify a quality initiative from your workplace. What were some barriers to implementation? What are common barriers for translating research into practice?

Topic 5 Participation

Description:

NA

Topic 5: Translating Evidence into Practice to Improve Safety and Quality and Eliminate Barriers

Description

Objectives:

1. Explain how translational research can be used for safety and quality improvement initiatives related to improving population health.
2. Discuss common barriers for translating research into practice.
Study Materials

Read Chapter 8 in Population Health: Creating a Culture of Wellness.

Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare

Description:

Read Chapters 4 and 9 in Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare.

Translating Evidence into Practice: How Advanced Practice RNs Can Guide Nurses in Challenging Established Practice to Arrive at Best Practice

Description:

Read “Translating Evidence into Practice: How Advanced Practice RNs Can Guide Nurses in Challenging Established Practice to Arrive at Best Practice,” by Fenci and Matthews, from AORN Journal(2017).

Eliminating Cardiovascular Health Disparities: There has Been Progress, but There is More to
Do!

Description:

Read “Eliminating Cardiovascular Health Disparities: There has Been Progress, but There is More to Do!” by Coke, from The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing (2018).

Quality Improvement in Athletic Health Care

Description:

Read “Quality Improvement in Athletic Health Care,” by Sauers, Sauers, and Valier, from Journal of Athletic Training
(2017).

Lost in Translation: The Promise and Problems of the Globalization of Research

Description:

Read “Lost in Translation: The Promise and Problems of the Globalization of Research,” by Baumann, from Nursing Science Quarterly (2019).

Decreasing Barriers to Research Utilization Among Labor and Delivery Nurses

Description:

Read “Decreasing Barriers to Research Utilization Among Labor and Delivery Nurses,” by Heelan-Fancher, Edmonds, and Jones, from Nursing Research (2019).

Differentiating Between Research and Quality Improvement

Description:

Read “Differentiating Between Research and Quality Improvement,” by Gregory, from Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing (2015).

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NUR-550 NUR-550-O503 Evidence-Based Practice Project: Evaluation of Literature Table 150.0

Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%) Satisfactory (88.00%) Good (92.00%) Excellent (100.00%)
Content 100.0%
PICOT 5.0% The PICOT is omitted. NA NA NA The PICOT is clearly and accurately presented.

Research Question, Hypothesis, Purpose or Aim of Study 10.0% Research question, hypothesis, purpose or aim of study for one or more articles is omitted. Research question, hypothesis, purpose or aim of study for each article is presented, but key information is consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies throughout. Research question, hypothesis, purpose or aim of study for each article is presented. Key aspects are missing for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies. Research question, hypothesis, purpose or aim of study for each article is adequately presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. A discussion on the research question, hypothesis, purpose or aim of study is thoroughly and accurately presented for each article.

Articles 10.0% Required number of sources are not included. Article citations and permalinks are omitted. Number of required sources is only partially met. Article citations and permalinks are presented. One or more links do not lead to the intended article. Number of required sources is met, but some sources are outdated or inappropriate. Article citations and permalinks are presented. Article citations are presented, but there are errors. Sources are current and generally appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Article citations and permalinks are presented. Article citations are presented, but there are minor errors. Sources are current and highly appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Article citations and permalinks are presented. Article citations are accurate. NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Evaluation of Literature Table

Study Design 10.0% The study design for one or more article is omitted. The study design for each article is presented, but key information is consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies throughout. The study design is indicated for each article. Key aspects are missing for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies. The study design is adequately presented for each article. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. A thorough and accurate discussion on the study design for each article is presented.

Setting and Sample 10.0% The setting and sample are omitted for one or more of the articles. The setting and sample are indicated for each article, but key information is consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies throughout. The setting and sample are indicated for each article. Key aspects are missing for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies. The setting and sample are adequately presented for each article. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. The setting and sample in which the researcher conducted the study are detailed and accurate for each article.

Methods 10.0% Method of study for one or more articles is omitted. Overall, the methods of study are incomplete. The method of study is presented for each article, but key information is consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies throughout. The method of study for each article is presented. Key aspects are missing for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies An adequate discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. A thorough and accurate discussion on the method of study for each article is presented.  NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Evaluation of Literature Table

NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Evaluation of Literature Table Analysis and Data Collection 10.0% Analysis and data collection for one or more articles is omitted. Overall, the analysis and data collection are incomplete. Analysis and data collection are presented for each article, but key information is consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies throughout. Analysis and data collection for each article are presented. Key aspects are missing for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies. An adequate discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. A thorough and accurate discussion on the analysis and data collection for each article is presented.

Outcomes and Key Findings 10.0% Outcomes and key findings for one or more articles are omitted. Overall, the outcomes and key findings are incomplete. Outcomes and key findings are presented for each article, but key information is consistently omitted. There are inaccuracies throughout. Outcomes and key findings for each article are presented. Key aspects are missing for one or two articles. There are minor inaccuracies. An adequate discussion on outcomes and key findings for each article are presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. A thorough and accurate discussion on the outcomes and key findings collection for each article are presented.

Recommendations 10.0% Researcher recommendations are omitted for one or more of the articles. The recommendations described for three or more articles are inaccurate or incomplete. Researcher recommendations are indicated for each article. The researcher recommendations described for two of the articles are inaccurate or incomplete. Researcher recommendations for each article are presented. Researcher recommendations described for one article are inaccurate or incomplete. Researcher recommendations for each article are accurately presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. Researcher recommendations are accurately and thoroughly described for each article.

Explanation of How Articles Support Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal 10.0% An explanation of how the article supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal is omitted for one or more of the articles. The explanation for three or more articles is inaccurate or incomplete. An explanation for how each article supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. The explanation for two of the articles is inaccurate or incomplete. A general explanation for how each article supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. The explanation for one article is inaccurate or incomplete. Support for the evidence-based project proposal is generally evident. An explanation for how each article supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. Adequate support for the evidence-based project proposal is demonstrated. A detailed explanation for how each article supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. Support for the evidence-based project proposal is clearly evident.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Lopes Write Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation

Welcome to class

Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to

I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.

Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.

If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.

Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.

Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.

I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

Hi Class,

Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.

Contact me if you have any questions.

Important information on Writing a Discussion Question

• Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
• There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
• Include in-text citations in your response
• Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
• Follow APA-7th edition
• Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor

• A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
• Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
• Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
• Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
• Follow APA 7th edition
• Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
• Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
• Here are some helpful links
• Student paper example
• Citing Sources
• The Writing Center is a great resource