NUR 550 Evaluate a clinical preventative intervention designed to promote health and wellness for populations

Sample Answer for NUR 550 Evaluate a clinical preventative intervention designed to promote health and wellness for populations Included After Question

Topic 6 DQ 1

Description:

Evaluate a clinical preventative intervention designed to promote health and wellness for populations. Summarize the intervention and explain whether it has been successful. You will use the clinical preventative intervention you select for DQ2.

Objectives:

1. Integrate appropriate information and communication technologies for clinical preventative intervention.
2. Evaluate clinical prevention interventions that promote health and wellness for populations.
Study Materials

Population Health: Creating a Culture of Wellness

Description:

Read Chapter 9 and review Chapter 1 in Population Health: Creating a Culture of Wellness.

Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare

NUR 550 Evaluate a clinical preventative intervention designed to promote health and wellness for populations

Description:

Read Chapter 19 in Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare.

The Role of the Nurse in Quality Improvement and Patient Safety

Description:

Read “The Role of the Nurse in Quality Improvement and Patient Safety,” by Hickey and Giardina, from Journal of Neurological and Neurosurgical Nursing(2019).

Reviewing the Literature: Essential First Step in Research, Quality Improvement, and Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice

Description:

Read “Reviewing the Literature: Essential First Step in Research, Quality Improvement, and Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice,” by Bernhofer, from Journal for Nurses in Professional Development (2015).

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 550 Evaluate a clinical preventative intervention designed to promote health and wellness for populations

Clinical Preventive Services

Description:

Read “Clinical Preventive Services,” by Guerrero Ayres and Bradley, from Encyclopedia of Nursing Research (2017).

Reviewing the Literature

Description:

Read “Reviewing the Literature,” by Bryne, from Sage Research Methods’ Project Planner (2017).

How to Conduct a Literature Review

Description:

Read “How to Conduct a Literature Review,” by Watts, from Podiatry Review (2020).

Preventative Care Benefits for Adults

Description:

Preventative Care Benefits for Adults,” located on the Healthcare.gov website.

My Healthfinder

Description:

Explore “My Healthfinder,” located on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services website.

Healthy People 2030

Description:

Explore “Healthy People 2030,” located on the Healthy People 2030 website.

Health Communication and Health Information Technology

Description:

Read “Health Communication and Health Information Technology,” located on the HealthyPeople.gov website.

Using E-Health and Information Technology to Improve Health

Description:

Read, “Using E-Health and Information Technology to Improve Health,” located on the World Health Organization website.

Technology and the Future of Mental Health Treatment

Description:

Read “Technology and the Future of Mental Health Treatment,” located on the Mental Health Information page of the National Institute of Mental Health website.

Impacts of Information and Communication Technologies on Nursing Care: An Overview of Systematic Reviews (Protocol)

Description:

Read “Impacts of Information and Communication Technologies on Nursing Care: An Overview of Systematic Reviews (Protocol),” by Rouleau, Gagnon and Cote, from Systematic Reviews (2015).

NUR 550 Evaluate a clinical preventative intervention designed to promote health and wellness for populations Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable	No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions. Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Application of Course Knowledge – Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources; Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources. Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content	Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson. Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson	Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post. Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life	Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category	5	4	3	2	0
Interactive Dialogue Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days. *(5 points possible per graded thread)*	Exceeds minimum post requirements Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days. Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days Replies to a question posed by a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days. The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty	Has only one post for the week Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments	Does not post to the thread No connections are made to the topic
	Minus 1 Point	Minus 2 Point	Minus 3 Point	Minus 4 Point	Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted. Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition	2-3 errors in APA format. Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors. Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.	4-5 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is somewhat focused.	6-7 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.	8-10 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.	Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format. Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style does not facilitate communication. The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
	0 points lost				-5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements *per discussion thread*	The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.				The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement *per discussion thread*	The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.				The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NUR 550 Evaluate a clinical preventative intervention designed to promote health and wellness for populations

Title: NUR 550 Evaluate a clinical preventative intervention designed to promote health and wellness for populations

Addressing Prescription Opioid Addiction among African Americans with Chronic Pain

At the Miami County Hospital, a concern arose about the use of prescription opioids (PO) for non-medical purposes among the Black population diagnosed with chronic pain. Some of the African American populations in Florida receiving PO for pain management sell the same to other members and this is majorly attributed to poverty among the racial group. According to Dasgupta, Beletsky, and Ciccarone (2018), the practice results in poor pain management which has led to increased incidences of readmission to the hospitals by the Blacks suffering from cancer and traumas that elicit intense pain.

The quality improvement initiative at the Miami County Hospital focuses on substituting PO with other analgesics for the African Americans. Specifically, the intervention vouches for the use of nonsteroidal ant-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as an alternative to opioids which are narcotics (Rudd et al., 2016). Even though the initiative aims to minimize addiction, the use of other pain drugs does not yield a bundle of evidence in chronic pain management for the population. Most of the Black patients enrolled on PO are presumed to be addicted to the drug and this impairs the potency of other analgesics administered to the group. A number of members from the group complain that the intensity of pain is not eliminated when NSAIDs prescription medications are administered to them other than morphine or opioids. Guided by this argument, it is imperative that the members of the racial group diagnosed with chronic pain and enrolled in PO medications prefer opioids to other analgesics (Dasgupta, Beletsky, & Ciccarone, 2018). The health facility will need to educate African Americans about the effectiveness of other analgesics and inform the group about the adverse events associated with PO misuse. Besides, weak opioids such as dihydrocodeine and codeine need to be administered to the racial group to address moderate to chronic pain.

References

Dasgupta, N., Beletsky, L., & Ciccarone, D. (2018). Opioid crisis: no easy fix to its social and economic determinants. American journal of public health, 108(2), 182-186.

Rudd, R. A., Aleshire, N., Zibbell, J. E., & Matthew Gladden, R. (2016). Increases in drug and opioid overdose deaths—the United States, 2000–2014. American Journal of Transplantation, 16(4), 1323-1327.