Boost your Grades with us today!
Sample Answer for NUR 550 Discuss the role of the Institutional Review Board Included After Question
NUR 550 Discuss the role of the Institutional Review Board
Topic 3 DQ 2
Description:
Discuss the role of the Institutional Review Board. Discuss ethical research considerations specific to population health. How is respect for the persons, potential benefits and burdens of the research, and justice kept in balance? Provide an example.
Description
Objectives:
1. Discuss ethical guidelines for conducting translational research.
2. Examine ethical considerations related to translating research into practice.
3. Examine legal considerations related to translating research into practice.
4. Discuss ethical research considerations specific to population health.
Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession
Description:
Read Chapter 26 in Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession.
Population Health: Creating a Culture of Wellness
Description:
Read Chapter 10 in Population Health: Creating a Culture of Wellness.
A Few Ethical Issues in Translation Research for Gene and Cell Therapy
Description:
Read “A Few Ethical Issues in Translation Research for Gene and Cell Therapy,” by Riva and Petrini, from Journal of Translational Medicine (2019).
The Underappreciated and Misunderstood PICOT Question: A Critical Step in EBP Process
Description:
Read “The Underappreciated and Misunderstood PICOT Question: A Critical Step in EBP Process,” by Gallagher-Ford and Melnyk, from Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing (2019).
Life After PICOT: Taking the Next Step in a Clinical Inquiry Project
Description:
Read “Life After PICOT: Taking the Next Step in a Clinical Inquiry Project,” by Granger, from AACN Advanced Critical Care (2020).
Description:
Read “The Belmont Report,” by The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, located on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services website (1979).
PICO: A Model for Evidence-Based Research
Description:
View “PICO: A Model for Evidence-Based Research,” by Binghamton University Libraries, located on YouTube (2017).
What is Evidence-Based Practice?
Description:
View “What is Evidence-Based Practice?” by Lippincott NursingCenter.com, located on YouTube (2016).
NUR 550 Discuss the role of the Institutional Review Board Grading Rubric Guidelines
Performance Category | 10 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 0 |
Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions. |
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Category | 10 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 0 |
Application of Course Knowledge –
Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Category | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
Interactive Dialogue
Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days. (5 points possible per graded thread) |
|
Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. |
|
|
|
Minus 1 Point | Minus 2 Point | Minus 3 Point | Minus 4 Point | Minus 5 Point | |
Grammar, Syntax, APA
Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted. Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition |
|
|
|
|
|
0 points lost | -5 points lost | ||||
Total Participation Requirements
per discussion thread |
The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. | The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days | |||
Early Participation Requirement
per discussion thread |
The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. | The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT. |
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NUR 550 Discuss the role of the Institutional Review Board
Title: NUR 550 Discuss the role of the Institutional Review Board
Topic 3 DQ 2
An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is an administrative body established to approve research studies before their commencement. The core mandate of IRBs is to ensure the protection of rights and the welfare of human research participants. The IRB also supervises research studies associated with their institution. The IRB has a responsibility to review and revise, prior to their initiation, all research studies that involve human subjects (Lapid et al., 2019). The review board protects the rights and privacy of human research subjects as they have the power to approve or not approve, monitor and ask for certain alterations or changes in all activities within their jurisdiction as spelt out by the federal regulations and institutional policies. The board ascertains that research studies carried within their mandates adhere to or comply with set regulations and ethical and legal parameters like the biomedical principles. These boards review continuing research studies to ensure that they do not cause harm to the participating human subjects. They also ensure that legal provisions like confidentiality, informed consent, and privacy are not violated by the researchers.
Ethical research consideration particular to certain population health entail respect for individuals or persons, justice, beneficence and not doing any harm or non-maleficence. The ethical considerations assist in the protection of human subjects in population health. For instance, researchers should respect the subjects by giving correct information about the effects of their studies while beneficence requires them to ensure that findings from their studies benefit populations (Clapp et al., 2017). The implication is that researcher can balance respect for persons, possible benefits and negative effects and justice by ascertaining that they comply with all ethical provisions due to their important role that they play in research studies. For example, respect for persons is critical and requires researchers to demonstrate fairness in their activities and provide necessary information about their research studies.
References
Clapp, J. T., Gleason, K. A., & Joffe, S. (2017). Justification and authority in institutional review
board decision letters. Social Science & Medicine, 194, 25-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.013
Lapid, M. I., Clarke, B. L., & Wright, R. S. (2019, March). Institutional review boards: What
clinician researchers need to know. In Mayo Clinic Proceedings (Vol. 94, No. 3, pp. 515-525). Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.01.020.