NUR 514 Topic 4 DQ 1: Leading and Patient Advocacy -

NUR 514 Topic 4 DQ 1 Leading and Patient Advocacy

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NUR 514 Topic 4 DQ 1: Leading and Patient Advocacy

Title: NUR 514 Topic 4 DQ 1: Leading and Patient Advocacy

Patient advocacy is a widely discussed topic in the field of nursing. The concept is defined as the action of nurses to promote patient interests and ensure that they can access appropriate information when making the decision and ensure they can access the required quality of health. Nurses leaders play an important role in the entire lives of nurses as well as the whole health care setting. They are responsible for all daily operations that take place in the workplace. Some of their roles include patient advocacy, resource allocation, risk management, patient safety, and staff development. When performing tasks such as patient advocacy, they are likely to face some professional barriers. Good examples of such barriers include retaliation, and some of the nurses in the group may have a different viewpoint (Tomaschewski-Barlem et al., 2017). If these barriers are not amicably solved may hinder the process of advocacy in a legislation process. These barriers can be handled by encouraging followers to actively become involved in the patient advocacy process, communicating expected standards, embracing quality improvement, using the control method to determine goals, and supporting research.

As a nurse leader, one is supposed to be expert in knowledge brokering. They are supposed to translate institution policy directives to actions that direct health care. Nurse leaders are supposed to communicate the information correctly to all their juniors and inform them of organizational policy (Figueira et al., 2018). Giving frank information to a group of nurses will ensure all nurses work as a team. Nurses’ leaders are supposed to balance their responsibility and accountability between their seniors in leadership and other staffs. Increasing job satisfaction, regulating nurses’ turnover, meeting quality targets are some of the roles that a nurse leader could play. However, even as they play those roles, nurse leaders should use their position to influence their juniors to become participative in advocacy. Effective communication regarding the necessity of their involvement could be one of the strategies that nurse leaders can adopt.

References

Figueira, A. B., Barlem, E. L. D., Amestoy, S. C., Silveira, R. S. D., Tomaschewski-Barlem, J. G., & Ramos, A. M. (2018). Health advocacy by nurses in the Family Health Strategy: barriers and facilitators. Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 71(1), 57-64.

Tomaschewski-Barlem, J. G., Lunardi, V. L., Barlem, E. L. D., Silveira, R. S. D., Ramos, A. M., & Piexak, D. R. (2017). Patient advocacy in nursing: Barriers, facilitators and potential implications. Texto & Contexto-Enfermagem, 26(3).

NUR 514 Topic 4 DQ 1 Leading and Patient Advocacy

Explain how health care policy affects health care organizations, patient care, and cost-effective quality care. What measures can the nurse leader take as an advocate for patient care and addressing health care cost?

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NUR 514 Topic 4 DQ 1: Leading and Patient Advocacy

Title: NUR 514 Topic 4 DQ 1: Leading and Patient Advocacy

As part of their humane and professional mandate, nurses are actively involved in policy advocacy. Such advocacy is characterized by nurses’ representation of patients, nurses’ needs, or the profession as a whole. In critical matters, nurses are involved in the legislative process to ensure that their proposals have legal and political support. However, the process is not as smooth as envisioned or expected. Barriers such as individuals sharing different viewpoints and retaliation are common. Jurns (2019) further noted that lack of adequate information regarding policy creation usually inhibits success. Due to such barriers, nurses can apply different strategies to enable them to represent the advanced registered nurse as leaders and patient advocates.

Always, the legislative process should be dominated by resilience and sufficient understanding of concepts and processes. Barriers are adequately resisted and overcome when policy promoters challenge them instead of evading them. A suitable example is where nurses or other policy promoters use their professional knowledge and comprehension of concepts to influence a change of opinions in individuals sharing different viewpoints. Reconciliation is crucial to come up with a common position that benefits patients, nurses, and the health practice at large. Safari et al. (2020) further mentioned that nurses involved in health and legislative policies should not participate in health policy-making activities at a moderate level. Accordingly, they should understand the procedures of the legislative process and act right while resisting all barriers. Approaching situations with an open mindset is also highly encouraged to reduce the chances of conflicts.

In any case, the legislative process encounters numerous barriers depending on the policy and advocacy team. Nurses should be prepared to face different challenges mentally and through the necessary resources. Resilience is essential, and an adequate understanding of the legislative and policy formulation process is part of the preparation as well.

References NUR 514 Topic 4 DQ 1: Leading and Patient Advocacy

Jurns, C. (2019). Policy Advocacy Motivators and Barriers: Research Results and Applications. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 24(3). doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol24No03PPT63

Safari, M. B., Bahadori, M., & Alimohammadzadeh, K. (2020). The related factors of nurses’ participation and perceived benefits and barriers in health policy making. Journal of Nursing Research, 28(4), e103. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000385

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 514 Topic 4 DQ 1: Leading and Patient Advocacy

NUR 514 Topic 4 DQ 1: Leading and Patient Advocacy Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable	No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions. Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Application of Course Knowledge – Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources; Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources. Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content	Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson. Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson	Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post. Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life	Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category	5	4	3	2	0
Interactive Dialogue Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days. *(5 points possible per graded thread)*	Exceeds minimum post requirements Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days. Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days Replies to a question posed by a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days. The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty	Has only one post for the week Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments	Does not post to the thread No connections are made to the topic
	Minus 1 Point	Minus 2 Point	Minus 3 Point	Minus 4 Point	Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted. Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition	2-3 errors in APA format. Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors. Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.	4-5 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is somewhat focused.	6-7 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.	8-10 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.	Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format. Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style does not facilitate communication. The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
	0 points lost				-5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements *per discussion thread*	The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.				The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement *per discussion thread*	The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.				The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

Also Check Out: NUR 514 Topic 3 DQ 2 As a nurse leader, how could you draw from change theory to address these concerns and encourage collaboration on the committee?