NUR 513 Topic 4 DQ 2 Select two different nursing theories and describe how they relate to patient care

Sample Answer for NUR 513 Topic 4 DQ 2 Select two different nursing theories and describe how they relate to patient care Included After Question

Topic 4 DQ 2

Select two different nursing theories and describe how they relate to patient care. How could you use them for inciting behavioral changes? Discuss the pros and cons of applying each theory and how they could be integrated into your future practice. Are there any particular ethical issues related to the integration of these theories that should be considered?

In response to your peers, cite a study that used one of the nursing theories you discussed. Explain the impact of the nursing theory on your approach to patient care. Cite at least one source to support your response.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NUR 513 Topic 4 DQ 2 Select two different nursing theories and describe how they relate to patient care

Title: NUR 513 Topic 4 DQ 2 Select two different nursing theories and describe how they relate to patient care

LopesWrite is software that assists students in practicing effective academic integrity. When submitting a paper, you will often see a prompt directing you to submit your paper to LopesWrite: “You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. Typically, the LopesWrite report should not have above 20% match.

Go to this site and read the “How to View the Citation Report.” Explain how you can revise and improve your paper by reviewing your similarity score, quoted text, and citation items prior to submitting your paper.

https://support.gcu.edu/hc/en-us/articles/201277380-LopesWrite

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NUR 513 Topic 4 DQ 2 Select two different nursing theories and describe how they relate to patient care

Title: NUR 513 Topic 4 DQ 2 Select two different nursing theories and describe how they relate to patient care

The provided link was very beneficial because the video helps to gain a general understanding of LopesWrite, and the additional written topics go into further detail on each specific portion. Grammar mistakes and material that has been flagged for plagiarism will be underlined on the report. The similarity report tells you the percentage of information outside of quotation marks that is similar to other internet/institution sources. For academic writing, your papers should not exceed 20% similarity report. Even if the originality report is under the 20% guideline, you must still be careful that no specific portion of your paper is plagiarized. Additionally, the quoted text portion indicates the percentage of words that are used within quotation marks; this does not count toward the similarity score, but you should use quotations sparingly. The citation items portion tells you the total amount of internet/institution sources that were detected within the paper. This tool is helpful as it plays as a safety net in regard to plagiarism. When reviewing the report, you will want to make sure your similarity report is less than 20%, fix any possible grammar errors, keep an eye on the amount of quoted text, and make sure that the appropriate sources are cited. You can make corrections and re-submit to LopesWrite as many times as necessary prior to submitting your final paper (GCU Technical Support, 2021).

References

LopesWrite. (2021). GCU Technical Support. Retrieved October 8,2022, from https://support.gcu.edu/hc/en-us/articles/201277380-LopesWrite

A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NUR 513 Topic 4 DQ 2 Select two different nursing theories and describe how they relate to patient care

Title: NUR 513 Topic 4 DQ 2 Select two different nursing theories and describe how they relate to patient care

LopesWrite is an electronic tool that is used for academic writing for words greater than five hundred. It checks for grammatical errors, spelling and citations. The main objective for lopesWrite is checking students work for plagiarism, taking credit for someone else writing knowing or unknowingly. After submitting your work to lobesWrite the system will generate a similarity/originality report within fifteen minutes looking for intext citation that matches a similar source within the database. A similarity score of less than 20 % can be acceptable however some professor might want a lower similarity score. Students has the opportunity to submit their work several times to lopesWrite until the acceptable score is reached. This is a great tool for it gives students another opportunity to revise their work and fix grammar and citations before finalizing the subscription

LopesWrite is a great tool to ensure that as students we are following academic and ethical guidelines in preventing plagiarism and giving credit to writers and researchers whose information we use to write our own papers. LopesWrite gives a report on how much of a paper is similar to other academic papers with the similarity score, and essentially acts as a proof reader for correct grammar, citation of sources, and writing of the reference page. Viewing the report before submitting helps the student find any errors or missed citations, then return to their writing to fix any mistakes before final submission for grading. With this tool, students should not submit any works that do not give appropriate credit to referenced works, grammar errors, plagiarized or overly similar works as their own research.

The similarity score shows the percentage of similarity of words that are not in quotation marks and other internet and institution resources. There is a breakdown showing a percentage for each internet and institution. If the report shows a 20% or higher match or the percentage the instructor has determined, the paper should be revised to improve the percentage to a lower one. One way to improve the score is to review the paper for quoted material that may have been missed being cited following the APA format using quotes. Quoted content is not included in the percentage report. Another way to improve the percentage is to review citation items. Notifications will appear in the right margin showing institution and internet sources. Citing information from sources is important, but it cannot make up too high of a percentage of the total paper. If the percentage is too high, focus on these areas of the paper, revise in your own words and review. Then, the paper can be resubmitted to LopesWrite as many times as needed to lower the percentage.

NUR 513 Topic 4 DQ 2 Select two different nursing theories and describe how they relate to patient care
NUR 513 Topic 4 DQ 2 Select two different nursing theories and describe how they relate to patient care

LopesWrite is a beneficial tool to prevent plagiarism in our academic writing and education. It helps to correct our grammar,spelling,vocabulary and repeated words in our essays and assignments. Plagiarism is a big ethical problem especially if we do not give credit to the author. Plagiarism is the practice of taking someone’s idea and using it in our work as it is our own work without giving credit to the real author. LopesWrite helps us to understand our mistakes and check similarities before we submit our final assignments. Lopes Write report says that academic writing should not have more than 20% similarity with internet content, books, or plagiarism. The link you provided was extremely useful to get to know how to upload our paper and send for similarity check and submit our assignment. I am looking forward to using Lopes Write in my assignments. Thank You.

 

A Sample Answer 4 For the Assignment: NUR 513 Topic 4 DQ 2 Select two different nursing theories and describe how they relate to patient care

Title: NUR 513 Topic 4 DQ 2 Select two different nursing theories and describe how they relate to patient care

According to Petripin (2023), nursing theory is “an organized framework of concepts and purposes designed to guide the practice of nursing”. They are developed to explain and describe nursing care, guide nursing practice, research and provide a foundation for clinical decision making. The two nursing theories I will discuss are of the two theorists Jean Watson and Madeleine Leininger’s nursing theories of which originated under the Developmental Model branch.

Jean Watson’s Human Caring Nursing Theory focuses on the principle of caring. It explains the importance for the patient and nurse to have a caring compassionate relationship.  Furthermore, Waston’s theory addresses the concerns of how nurses care for their patients and that patients are not objects but valued human beings. Watson refers to human beings as a valued person to be cared for, respected, nurtured, understood, and assisted. According to Gonzalo (2023), her theory stresses the humanistic aspects of nursing as they intertwine with scientific knowledge and nursing practice. She also emphasizes the importance of promoting health, caring for the sick, and treating diseases. Watson devised 10 caring needs specific carative factors critical to the caring human experience that need to be addressed by nurses with their patients when in a caring role (Gonzalo, 2013).

Madeleine Leininger’s Transcultural Nursing Theory focuses on nursing care to fit with or have beneficial meaning and health outcomes for people of different or similar cultural backgrounds (Gonzalo, 2023). It involves knowing and understanding different cultures concerning nursing and health-illness caring practices, beliefs, and values to provide meaningful and efficacious nursing care services to people’s cultural values health-illness context (Gonzalo, 2023). According to McFarland & Wehbe-Alamah (2019, as cited in McFarland, 2018c; McFarland & Wehbe-Alamah, 2015), the Cultural Care Theory was designed to help guide nurse researchers in discovering new meanings, patterns, expressions, and practices related to culture care that have influenced the health and well-being of individuals, families, and cultural groups. The goal of Leininger’s theory is for nurses to be knowledgeable in providing transcultural nursing care that will assist the patients’ well-being, health, assisting them to face disabilities and death. Leininger developed three cultural care decisions and actions for nurses to succeed and provide culturally friendly care. They are cultural preservation, cultural care accommodation or negotiation, and cultural care repatterning or restructuring (Petripin, 2023).

Comparing Transcultural and Human Caring Theories, they both fall under the Developmental Model branch of which assumes that there is a process of growth or maturation that is directional and has some orderly purpose (Tourville & Ingalls, 2003, p. 28). Leininger and Watson both identify nursing as a humanistic science with the concept of caring being the central unifying domain of nursing (Cohen, 1991, p. 908). Both have demonstrated their artistry in their individual portraits of change and in their contributions to the development of nursing knowledge (Cohen, 1991, p. 909).

The origin of both nursing theories was developed from Watson’s and Leininger’s different background experiences. With that said, both have a different view regarding caring in which they demonstrate a difference in emphasis on philosophical, cultural, and empirical concerns.  For example, Leininger stresses the importance of nurses to be knowledgeable in caring for people with different cultural backgrounds because they have different values, beliefs, customs, and behaviors.  On the other hand, Watson has focused on the philosophic (existential-phenomenological) and spiritual basis of caring and sees caring as the ethical and moral ideal of nursing (Cohen, 1991, p. 909).

As I look forward to the future of becoming a nurse educator, I feel that Leininger and Watson’s nursing theories will be essential to my future profession. However, Leininger’s nursing theory is more applicable to my practice because it involves knowing and understanding different cultures concerning nursing and health-illness caring practices, beliefs, and values to provide meaningful and efficacious nursing care services to people’s cultural values health-illness context (Gonzalo, 2023). My practice consists of working in the outpatient and in the inpatient settings in which we see many patients from around the world with different cultural backgrounds. This nursing theory will be essential to our wound and ostomy team because it will guide us to provide optimal cultural patient care not only to the patients but also to their families as well.

 

References:

Cohen, J. A. (1991). Two portraits of caring: A comparison of the artists, Leininger and Watson. Journal of Advanced Nursing16(8), 899–909. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1991.tb01794.x

Gonzalo, A. (2023b) Jean Watson: Theory of Human Caring. Nurseslabs.  Jean Watson: Theory of Human Caring – Nurseslabs

Gonzalo, A. (2023). Madeleine Leininger: Transcultural Nursing. Nurseslabs. Madeleine Leininger: Transcultural Nursing Theory – Nurseslabs

McFarland, M. R., & Wehbe-Alamah, H. B. (2019). Leininger’s theory of Culture Care Diversity and universality: An overview with a historical retrospective and a view toward the future. Journal of Transcultural Nursing30(6), 540–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659619867134

Petiprin, A. (2023). Madeleine Leininger. Nursing Theory. https://nursing-theory.org/nursing-theorists/Madeleine-Leininger.php

Tourville, C., & Ingalls, K. (2003). The Living Tree of Nursing Theories. Nursing Forum38(3), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0029-6473.2003.t01-1-00021.x

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 513 Topic 4 DQ 2 Select two different nursing theories and describe how they relate to patient care 

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

Read Also:  NUR 513 Topic 4 DQ 1 Compare and contrast two nursing theories