Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NUR-513-RS-NursingRolesGraphicOrganizerTemp

NUR-513-RS-NursingRolesGraphicOrganizerTemp

Assessment Description
Advanced registered nurses work in highly collaborative environments and must
collaborate with interdisciplinary teams in order to provide excellent patient care.
Besides knowing the role and scope of ones own practice, it is essential to
understand the role and scope of other nurse specialties to ensure effective
collaboration among nurses, the organization, and other professionals with whom
advanced registered nurses regularly interact.
Use the Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer Template to differentiate how advanced
registered nurse roles relate to and collaborate with different areas of nursing practice.
Compare your future role with one of the following: nurse educator; nurse leader;
family nurse practitioner; acute care nurse practitioner; graduate nurse with an
emphasis/specialty in public health, health care administration, business, or
informatics; clinical nurse specialist; doctor of nursing practice. Indicate in the
appropriate columns on the template which roles you are comparing.
Make sure to compare the following areas of practice in your graphic organizer:
1. Ethics
2. Education
3. Leadership
4. Public Health
5. Health Care Administration
6. Informatics
7. Business/Finance
8. Specialty (e.g., Family, Acute Care)
Include any regulatory bodies or certification agencies that provide guidance or
parameters on how these roles incorporate concepts into practice.
You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources
must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria
and nursing content. Ensure that the country in the source is relevant to your paper.
Sources cited should be generalizable to the population being studied or discussed.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing
is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting

guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student
Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the
assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Attachments
NUR-513-RS-NursingRolesGraphicOrganizerTemp

Rubric Criteria
Total120 points
Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Insufficient 3. Approaching 4. Acceptable 5. Targeted
Comparison of
Roles in Relation to
Leadership
Comparison of Roles
in Relation to
Leadership

0 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to leadership is
not included.

9.6 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to leadership is
present, but it lacks detail
or is incomplete.

10.56 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to leadership is
present.

11.04 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to leadership is
clearly provided and well
developed.

12 points
A comprehensive
comparison of roles in
relation to leadership is
thoroughly developed with
supporting details.

Required Sources
Required Sources

0 points
Sources are not included.

4.8 points
Number of required
sources is only partially
met.

5.28 points
Number of required sources
is met, but sources are
outdated or inappropriate.

5.52 points
Number of required sources
is met. Sources are current,
but not all sources are
appropriate for the
assignment criteria and
nursing content.

6 points
Number of required
resources is met. Sources
are current, and appropriate
for the assignment criteria
and nursing content.

Comparison of
Roles in Relation to
Business or Finance
Comparison of Roles
in Relation to
Business or Finance

0 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to business or
finance is not included.

9.6 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to business or
finance is present, but it
lacks detail or is
incomplete.

10.56 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to business or
finance is present.

11.04 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to business or
finance is clearly provided
and well developed.

12 points
A comprehensive
comparison of roles in
relation to business or
finance is thoroughly
developed with supporting
details.
Comparison of 0 points 9.6 points 10.56 points 11.04 points 12 points

Roles in Relation to
Public Health
Comparison of Roles
in Relation to Public
Health

A comparison of roles in
relation to public health is
not included.

A comparison of roles in
relation to public health is
present, but it lacks detail
or is incomplete.

A comparison of roles in
relation to public health is
present.

A comparison of roles in
relation to public health is
clearly provided and well
developed.

A comprehensive
comparison of roles in
relation to public health is
thoroughly developed with
supporting details.

Presentation
Presentation

0 points
The piece is not neat or
organized, and it does
not include all required
elements.

4.8 points
The work is not neat and
includes minor flaws or
omissions of required
elements.

5.28 points
The overall appearance is
general, and major
elements are missing.

5.52 points
The overall appearance is
generally neat, with a few
minor flaws or missing
elements.

6 points
The work is well presented
and includes all required
elements. The overall
appearance is neat and
professional.

Comparison of
Roles in Relation to
Education
Comparison of Roles
in Relation to
Education

0 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to education is
not included.

9.6 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to education is
present, but it lacks detail
or is incomplete.

10.56 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to education is
present.

11.04 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to education is
clearly provided and well
developed.

12 points
A comprehensive
comparison of roles in
relation to education is
thoroughly developed with
supporting details.

Comparison Roles
in Relation to Health
Care Administration
Comparison Roles in
Relation to Health
Care Administration

0 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to health care
administration is not
included.

9.6 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to health care
administration is present,
but it lacks detail or is
incomplete.

10.56 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to health care
administration is present.

11.04 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to health care
administration is clearly
provided and well
developed.

12 points
A comprehensive
comparison of roles in
relation to health care
administration is thoroughly
developed with supporting
details.

Comparison of
Roles in Relation to
Ethics
Comparison of Roles
in Relation to Ethics

0 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to ethics is not
included.

9.6 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to ethics is
present, but it lacks detail
or is incomplete.

10.56 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to ethics is present.

11.04 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to ethics is clearly
provided and well
developed.

12 points
A comprehensive
comparison of roles in
relation to ethics is
thoroughly developed with
supporting details.

Comparison of
Roles in Relation to
Informatics
Comparison of Roles
in Relation to

0 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to informatics is
not included.

9.6 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to informatics is
present, but it lacks detail
or is incomplete.

10.56 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to informatics is
present.

11.04 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to informatics is
clearly provided and well
developed.

12 points
A comprehensive
comparison of roles in
relation to informatics is
thoroughly developed with

Informatics supporting details.
Visual Appeal
Visual Appeal

0 points
There are few or no
graphic elements. No
variation in layout or
typography is evident.

4.8 points
Color is garish or
typographic variations are
overused and legibility
suffers. Background
interferes with readability.
Understanding of
concepts, ideas, and
relationships is limited.

5.28 points
Minimal use of graphic
elements is evident.
Elements do not
consistently contribute to
the understanding of
concepts, ideas, and
relationships. There is some
variation in type size, color,
and layout.

5.52 points
Thematic graphic elements
are used but not always in
context. Visual connections
mostly contribute to the
understanding of concepts,
ideas, and relationships.
Differences in type size and
color are used well and
consistently.

6 points
Appropriate and thematic
graphic elements are used
to make visual connections
that contribute to the
understanding of concepts,
ideas, and relationships.
Differences in type size and
color are used well and
consistently.

Mechanics of
Writing (includes
spelling,
punctuation,
grammar, and
language use)
Mechanics of Writing
(includes spelling,
punctuation,
grammar, and
language use)

0 points
Surface errors are
pervasive enough that
they impede
communication of
meaning. Inappropriate
word choice or sentence
construction is employed.

4.8 points
Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors distract
the reader.
Inconsistencies in
language choice
(register) or word choice
are present. Sentence
structure is correct but
not varied.

5.28 points
Some mechanical errors or
typos are present, but they
are not overly distracting to
the reader. Correct and
varied sentence structure
and audience-appropriate
language are employed.

5.52 points
Prose is largely free of
mechanical errors, although
a few may be present. The
writer uses a variety of
effective sentence
structures and figures of
speech.

6 points
The writer is clearly in
command of standard,
written, academic English.

Documentation of
Sources
Documentation of
Sources (citations,
footnotes, references,
bibliography, etc., as
appropriate to
assignment and style)
0 points
Sources are not
documented.

4.8 points
Documentation of
sources is inconsistent or
incorrect, as appropriate
to assignment and style,
with numerous formatting
errors.

5.28 points
Sources are documented,
as appropriate to
assignment and style,
although some formatting
errors may be present.

5.52 points
Sources are documented,
as appropriate to
assignment and style, and
format is mostly correct.

6 points
Sources are completely and
correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment
and style, and format is free
of error.

Comparison of
Roles in Relation to
Specialty
Comparison of Roles
in Relation to

0 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to specialty is not
included.

4.8 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to specialty is
present, but it lacks detail
or is incomplete.

5.28 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to specialty is
present.

5.52 points
A comparison of roles in
relation to specialty is
clearly provided and well
developed.

6 points
A comprehensive
comparison of roles in
relation to specialty is
thoroughly developed with

Specialty

NUR-513-RS-NursingRolesGraphicOrganizerTemp

NUR-513-RS-NursingRolesGraphicOrganizerTemp

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NUR-513-RS-NursingRolesGraphicOrganizerTemp

 

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.

Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.

One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.

I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.

In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.

Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).

Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).

Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.

I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.

As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.

It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category   5 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand. 
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.       The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.       The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.