NUR 513 Discuss the role of the advanced registered nurse in advocating for patient safety and rights in conducting research

Sample Answer for NUR 513 Discuss the role of the advanced registered nurse in advocating for patient safety and rights in conducting research Included After Question

Topic 7 DQ 2

Description:

What are some of the major ethical issues in conducting research that impacts the advanced registered nurse? Discuss the role of the advanced registered nurse in advocating for patient safety and rights in conducting research.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NUR 513 Discuss the role of the advanced registered nurse in advocating for patient safety and rights in conducting research

Title: NUR 513 Discuss the role of the advanced registered nurse in advocating for patient safety and rights in conducting research

In the course of conducting research, numerous ethical issues arise that significantly impact the advanced registered nurse, with the foremost concern being obtaining informed consent; research involving patients necessitates appropriately obtained consent from capable individuals, granting non-consenting patients the right to opt out. Patients should have the autonomy to decide how their health information is used and shared. Maintaining confidentiality, integral to informed consent, involves upholding patient privacy rights, including compliance with HIPAA regulations. Additionally, ethical considerations extend to addressing conflicts of interest, acknowledging the potential for unconscious bias based on a researcher’s upbringing and diverse worldviews during the research process. Furthermore, nurses involved in delivering healthcare services are inherently intertwined with ethical dilemmas, as they are directly involved in patient care and interactions with their families. Being healthcare professionals, nurses adhere to a code of ethics that mandates their readiness to address moral and ethical challenges. Furthermore, ethical competence in nursing practice is integral to maintaining the quality, professionalism, and safety of nursing services (Fithriyyah et al., 2023).

In healthcare research, the advanced registered nurse plays a key role in looking out for patient safety and rights. It’s not just about supporting these things; it’s also about sticking to good ethical practices. A big part of the job is making sure to get informed consent right. That means participants really understand what the research is about and agree to be part of it. At the same time, the nurse has to keep sensitive info confidential, following privacy rules like HIPAA. Plus, they’re on the lookout for any potential issues that might come up during the study, making sure everyone involved is treated well and stays safe.

 

Reference

Fithriyyah, Y. N., Alda, A. K., & Haryani, H. (2023). Trends and ethical issues in nursing during disasters: A systematic review. Nursing Ethics, 30(6), 753–775. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/09697330231155602

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NUR 513 Discuss the role of the advanced registered nurse in advocating for patient safety and rights in conducting research

Title: NUR 513 Discuss the role of the advanced registered nurse in advocating for patient safety and rights in conducting research

Conducting research is essential in building safe quality patient care. How the information is gathered must also be held to high standards. In research, as an advanced registered nurse, there are major ethical issues that must be addressed. The information being collected must be unbiased. The patients must be made aware of the treatments being studied while being administered. “In patient care, ethical conflicts are related to patients’ fundamental rights for information, involvement, and equality” (Usberg et al., 2021, p. 239). The patients must also understand how their personal information is being used. After understanding this, they must sign documents stating the release of their information. The licensed professionals must also ensure that the patient’s questions have all been answered before releasing their personal information. During this process, the advanced registered nurse also understands that they are first and foremost, the patient’s advocate. According to Abbasinia et al. (2020) obtaining health-related information and decision-making are extremely important and they need someone to advocate for them. This is one of the most important parts of being a nurse. A person’s health is a delicate precious gift and we as nurses do our very best to protect a patient’s health.

 

References

 

Abbasinia, M., Ahmadi, F., & Kazemnejad, A. (2020). Patient advocacy in nursing: A concept analysis. Nursing Ethics, 27(1), 141–151. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/0969733019832950

Usberg, G., Uibu, E., Urban, R., & Kangasniemi, M. (2021). Ethical conflicts in nursing: An interview study. Nursing Ethics, 28(2), 230–241. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/0969733020945751

A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NUR 513 Discuss the role of the advanced registered nurse in advocating for patient safety and rights in conducting research

Title: NUR 513 Discuss the role of the advanced registered nurse in advocating for patient safety and rights in conducting research

One ethical issue that an advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) can come across is conflicting professional obligations. One obligation could be fidelity to the patient vs. advancing research for the greater good (Larkin et al., 2017). On one hand the APRN wants to do right by their patient because their patient is not just a number in some study. On the other hand the APRN would like for their research to help thousands of people and therefore may have to push aside some of their feelings of infidelity toward the patient. At the end of the day, however, patient safety should be the APRN’s main goal and if the research puts the patient at risk in any way it should be the APRN who steps up and voices their concern for patient safety and possibly even comes up with another alternative to keep the patient safe.

This can be different compared to a registered nurses (RN)’s role, because the APRN has more autonomy in research situations. The RN’s role in research is more about blindly following orders and not having much autonomy. Where an APRN may be the lead researcher or could have found something revolutionary that they are able to subject patients to in order to benefit the greater good. APRN’s do not have to have the internal battle that RN’s do about if something is out of their scope of practice nearly as much. APRN’s have a unique spot in research because they not only communicate with the patient’s but they are also heading research.

 

Larkin, M. E., Beardslee, B., Cagliero, E., Griffith, C. A., Milaszewski, K., Mugford, M. T., Myerson, J. M., Ni, W., Perry, D. J., Winkler, S., & Witte, E. R. (2017). Ethical challenges experienced by clinical research nurses:: A qualitative study. Nursing Ethics, 26(1), 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733017693441

Description

Objectives:

1. Discuss the importance of evidence-based practice within advanced registered nursing practice.
2. Evaluate the role of the advanced registered nurse in relation to ethical conduct in research.
3. Investigate databases to identify evidence-based practice research related to an area of interest in your practice.
Study Materials

 

Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession

Description:

Review Chapters 20-22 in Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession.

NUR 513 Discuss the role of the advanced registered nurse in advocating for patient safety and rights in conducting research
NUR 513 Discuss the role of the advanced registered nurse in advocating for patient safety and rights in conducting research

GCU Library: Nursing and Health Sciences Research Guide

Description:

Revie w the “Nursing and Health Sciences” research guide, located on the GCU Library website.

Defining Scholarship for the Discipline of Nursing

Description:

Read “Defining Scholars hip for the Discipline of Nursing,” by Edwards, Alic hnie, Easle y, Edw ardso n, Keating, and Stanley (1999 ), located on the American Association of Colleges of Nursing website.

The Impact of Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and the Next Big Ideas

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 513 Discuss the role of the advanced registered nurse in advocating for patient safety and rights in conducting research

 

Description:

Read “The Impact of Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and the Next Big Ideas,” by Stevens, from Online Journal of Issues in Nursing(2013).

Cochrane Library

Description:

Explore the Cochrane Libra1y website.

GCU Library: General Research Guide

Description:

Review the “General Research” guide , located on the GCU Libra1y website.

GCU Library: Persistent Links Research Guide

Description:

Review the “Persistent Links” research guide , located on the GCU Libra1y website, to learn how to locate persistent links for libra1y articles , videos, etc.

RefWorks from the GCU Library

Description:

Manage your citations with the RefWorks tool , located on the GCU Libra1y website. RefWorks automates the creation of your reference lists in the format of your choice (APA, MLA, etc.).

GCU Library: Nursing and Health Sciences Research Guide

Description:

Review the “Nursing and Health Sciences” research guid e, located on the GCU Library website.

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)
  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition
  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

 The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

 The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.