Sample Answer for NUR 513 Discuss methods for accessing and evaluating nursing research Included After Question
Topic 6 DQ 2
Description:
Imagine the following scenario: You are taking the evidence-based practice course and one of your classmates shares an EBP project draft with you. You notice that some of the research has not been cited correctly or even at all. When you approach your classmate, the response is that “no one will notice and it is not a big deal anyway.” What are your next steps in speaking with your classmate? Consider how this could reflect on the credibility and integrity of the individuals involved, the University, and the profession.
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NUR 513 Discuss methods for accessing and evaluating nursing research
Title: NUR 513 Discuss methods for accessing and evaluating nursing research
The first thing I would do would be to remind my classmate that correctly citing their sources is important as a way to give credit to the owner, to show academic honesty and integrity by avoiding plagiarism, and because it demonstrates credibility as a writer. I would then remind the student that the university uses a program to detect similarities between the work they submit against published works. The professor is notified if the similarity report is too high. This could lead to an investigation by the university and the student could face disciplinary action as well as civil penalties as well.
If someone was found to have plagiarized as a student, it would make them look lazy and dishonest for stealing someone else work. The university would look inept for not having procedures in place to catch the plagiarism, and their credibility as an instuition would be questioned. Lastly, this would reflect poorly on the nursing profession as nurses are trusted to demonstrate ethics and integrity.
Grand Canyon University. (n.d.). Academic integrity. GCU. https://students.gcu.edu/academics/academic-integrity.php
A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NUR 513 Discuss methods for accessing and evaluating nursing research
Title: NUR 513 Discuss methods for accessing and evaluating nursing research
Evidence-based practice ensures optimal outcomes for whenever it is implemented in any field as it has been tried and tested. Many hospitals are embracing evidence-based practice in daily operations. It is highly likely that a researcher may be tempted to reproduce the “golden formula” from these institutions and bring it in their own. While this may seem like a brilliant idea, credit must be given to the source of the information. When conversing with this colleague, I would inform them about the GCU policy regarding plagiarism and the importance of academic integrity. I will also reinforce the need to give citation for any work that is quoted directly or indirectly, any idea that is borrowed from another source or even when referring to an instructor’s point (Grand Canyon University (GCU), n.d). I will educate them on lopes Write originality checker used at GCU which will discover her work that has no citations or plagiarized. Original work may be subjected to copyright law therefore, they need to be aware of the consequences of plagiarism in the profession and not to dismiss it as “not a big deal.” Finally, I will encourage them that using other people’s scholarly and journal articles is good as it enriches one’s research. However, credibility must always be given to the source, and they should derive pride in their own original work. When evaluating plagiarized work for currency, relevance, authority, accuracy and purpose (CRAAP), it will likely fail the credibility test hence reflecting negatively on the authors as well as affiliated institutions (New Jersey Institute of Technology, n.d).
Reference
Grand Canyon University (n.d). Academic integrity. https://students.gcu.edu/academics/academic-integrity.php
New Jersey Institute of Technology (n.d). How to evaluate information sources. https://researchguides.njit.edu/evaluate/CRAAP
A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NUR 513 Discuss methods for accessing and evaluating nursing research
Title: NUR 513 Discuss methods for accessing and evaluating nursing research
In this scenario of approaching a classmate who has not properly cited their project or completely omitted citations from their draft, I would question whether they care about their work. Enrolling in academic courses at the college level should not be taken lightly in my opinion and once a person commits themselves to a class, they are agreeing to uphold their integrity, honesty, and work ethic to produce quality papers and projects, including citing sources. I would ask if they need help to properly cite sources or to verify if their sources are reputable and accurate for the topic because they may have had an issue when doing their research, or possibly did not know how to search the library databases for articles. I would refer them to the GCU Library’s Citing Sources Guides website and encourage them to sign up for a library webinar for a tutorial to assist them in conducting research and creating citations. If my classmate was still resistant to citing sources then I would encourage them to review GCU’s Policy Handbook which addresses academic integrity violations as well as the student code of conduct that maintains a level of professionalism and respect individually, with others, and within work produced (Grand Canyon University, 2023).
References
Grand Canyon University. (2023). University policy handbook 2023-2024. https://www.gcu.edu/sites/default/files/media/documents/academics/handbook/2023-24/university-policy-handbook-Spring-2024-v1.pdf
A Sample Answer 4 For the Assignment: NUR 513 Discuss methods for accessing and evaluating nursing research
Title: NUR 513 Discuss methods for accessing and evaluating nursing research
I would explain to my classmate the importance of proper citation and the negative effects of plagiarism. “It’s important to cite sources you used in your research for several reasons: to show your reader you’ve done proper research by listing sources you used to get your information; to be a responsible scholar by giving credit to other researchers and acknowledging their ideas; to avoid plagiarism by quoting words and ideas used by other authors; and to allow your reader to track down the sources you used by citing them accurately in your paper by way of footnotes, a bibliography, or reference list” (MIT, 2023). As professionals on a graduate level, we should hold ourselves to a higher standard when completing projects. Although most incidences are not illegal, plagiarism is a violation of both the honor and ethics codes and can result in academic disciplinary action. The Legal Information Institute at Cornell Law School states that “plagiarism can warrant legal action if it infringes upon the original author’s copyright, patent, or trademark. Plagiarism can also result in a lawsuit if it breaches a contract with terms that only original work is acceptable” (LIT, 2022). We should always work with integrity and honor. Working with integrity means that you do the right thing, even when no one is watching or knows. We should always make sure not to mislead anyone by taking credit for work done by others.
Legal Information Institute. (2022). Plagiarism. Cornell Law School. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/plagiarism#:~:text=Plagiarism%20is%20the%20act%20of,a%20person’s%20school%20or%20workplace.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (2023). Citing Sources: Overview. https://libguides.mit.edu/c.php?g=176032&p=1159439
Description
Objectives:
1. Describe the characteristics of scholarly nursing research for the advanced registered nurse.
2. Discuss methods for accessing and evaluating nursing research.
3. Relate credibility to academic integrity and evidence-based practice expectations.
II Study Materials
Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession
Description:
Read Chapters 20-22 in Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession.
lnfom,ation Literacy: The Perils of Online Research
Description:
Watch “Information Literacy: The Perils of Online Research,” by Cambridge Educational (2006), available througb Films on Demand in the GCU Libraty.
Effective Internet Search: Basic Tools and Advanced Strategies
Description:
Watch “Effective Internet Search: Basic Tools and Advanced Strategies,” by Cambridge Educational (2011), available through Films on Demand in the GCU Libra1y.
Researching, Reading, and Writing
Description:
Watch “Researching, Reading, and Writing,” by Cambr idge Educational (2009), avai lable througb Films on Demand in the GCU Librruy.
A Scholar Is What a Scholar Writes: Practical Tips on Scholarly Writing
Description:
Read “A Scholru·Is What a Scho lru· Writes: Practical Tips on Scholru·ly Writing,” by Walker, from Joumal of Theory Construction & Testing (2003).
Library Walkthrough Tutorial
Description:
Watch the “Librru·y Walkthrougb Tutoria l” to become familiar w ith the GCU Libra1y.
Critically Analyzing Information Sources: Critical Appraisal and Analysis
Description:
Read “Critically Analyzing Information Sources: Critical Appraisal and Analysis,” located on the Cornell University Library website.
About Turnitin and Plagiarism
Description:
Read the “About Turnitin” and “P lagiarism” sections of the Academic Integrity page of the GCU website.
GCU Library: General Research Guide
Description:
Review the “General Research” guide , located on the GCU Libra1y website.
GCU Library: Persistent Links Research Guide
Description:
Review the “Persistent Links” research guide , located on the GCU Libra1y website, to learn how to locate persistent links for libra1y articles , videos, etc.
RefWorks from the GCU Library
Description:
Manage your citations with the RefWorks tool , located on the GCU Libra1y website. RefWorks automates the creation of your reference lists in the format of your choice (APA, MLA, etc.).
GCU Library: Nursing and Health Sciences Research Guide
Description:
Review the “Nursing and Health Sciences” research guid e, located on the GCU Library website.
Grading Rubric Guidelines
| Performance Category | 10 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 0 |
| Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Performance Category | 10 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 0 |
| Application of Course Knowledge –
Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
|
|
|
|
|
| Performance Category | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Interactive Dialogue
Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days. (5 points possible per graded thread) |
|
Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. |
|
|
|
| Minus 1 Point | Minus 2 Point | Minus 3 Point | Minus 4 Point | Minus 5 Point | |
| Grammar, Syntax, APA
Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted. Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 points lost | -5 points lost | ||||
| Total Participation Requirements
per discussion thread |
The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. | The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days | |||
| Early Participation Requirement
per discussion thread |
The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. | The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT. |