Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NUR 513: Describe the purpose of applying nursing theory to patient care.

NUR 513: Describe the purpose of applying nursing theory to patient care.

Assessment Description
APA style is used for professional writing in nursing and health care. As a
professional, it is important to be able to clearly communicate your research or
professional writing in an accurately formatted paper using the most current APA style.
The purpose of this assignment is to write a 500–750-word paper focusing on the
proper application of APA style.
Refer to the resources in the Class Resources and Student Success Center for
assistance with APA. Use the APA Style Guide resource, located in the Student
Success Center, to complete this assignment.
Include the following in your paper:
1. Describe the purpose of applying nursing theory to patient care.
2. Explain why nursing theory is meaningful to current practice.
3. Explain how a nursing theory can be applied before planning and providing
care in current practice.
4. Discuss which theory best reflects your personal view of the essence of
nursing and how it has been helpful to you for planning and providing care
to your patients.
You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment.
Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment
criteria and nursing content.
Complete the "APA Writing Checklist" to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style
and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the
completed checklist as an appendix at the end of your paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide,
located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the
assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite
technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Read Also:DQ 2: Select two different nursing theories and describe how they relate to patient care.

Attachments
MSN-APA Writing Checklist-Student.docx
Rubric Criteria
Total50 points
Criterion 1. 1: Unsatisfactory 2. 2:Insufficient 3. 3: Approaching 4. 4: Acceptable 5. 5: Targeted
References
References

0 points
Sources are not
documented. A reference
page is not included.

6 points
Documentation of sources
using a reference page is
inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and
the required style, with
numerous formatting errors.

6.6 points
Sources are documented on
a reference page, as
appropriate to assignment
and the required style,
although some formatting
errors may be present.

6.9 points
Sources are documented
on a reference page, as
appropriate to
assignment and the
required style, and
format is mostly correct.

7.5 points
Sources are completely
and correctly
documented on a
reference page, as
appropriate to
assignment and the
required style, and
format is free of error.

Appendix
Appendix

0 points
The Appendix is not
formatted according to The
required style. The
Appendix and APA Writing
Checklist are omitted.

2 points
The APA Writing Checklist is
attached in the Appendix but is
incomplete. The Appendix
reflects some the required
formatting, but overall it is not
correctly applied.

2.2 points
The APA Writing Checklist is
complete and attached in the
Appendix. The required
formatting is applied but
there are minor errors.

2.3 points
The APA Writing
Checklist is complete
and attached in the
Appendix. The required
formatting is applied,
although there may be
one or two errors.

2.5 points
The APA Writing
Checklist is complete
and attached in the
Appendix. The required
format is applied
correctly. There are no
errors.

Title Page
Title Page

0 points
The title page is not
formatted according to
required style. The title
page is omitted.

2 points
The title page reflects some
required formatting, but overall
it is not correctly applied.

2.2 points
The title page is presented.
required formatting is applied
but there are minor errors.

2.3 points
The title page is
presented. required
formatting is applied,
although there may be
one or two errors.

2.5 points
The title page is
presented. required
format is applied
correctly. There are no
errors.

Introduction
Introduction

0 points
The introduction is not
presented in required
format. The introduction is
omitted.

6 points
An introduction is presented
but the overall required
formatting is not consistently or
correctly applied.

6.6 points
An introduction is presented.
The required formatting is
applied but there are minor
errors.

6.9 points
The introduction is
presented. The required
formatting is applied,
although there may be
one or two errors.

7.5 points
The introduction is
presented. The required
format is applied
correctly. There are no
errors.

Nursing Theory
Nursing Theory

0 points
The theory presented is not
6 points
A nursing theory is presented.

6.6 points
A nursing theory is

6.9 points
A nursing theory is

7.5 points
A nursing theory is

a nursing theory. The criteria for the assignment
are incomplete. There are
major inaccuracies.

summarized. The criteria for
the assignment contain some
omissions or inaccuracies.

presented. The criteria
for the assignment are
addressed with sufficient
support. There are minor
inaccuracies or
omissions.

clearly and accurately
presented. The criteria
for the assignment are
clearly addressed and
well supported.

Main Body
Main Body

0 points
The required formatting is
not used for the main body.
6 points
The way the main body is
disorganized. Overall, the
required formatting is not
consistently or correctly
applied.

6.6 points
The sections of the main
body are generally
identifiable. The required
formatting is applied but
there are minor errors.

6.9 points
The sections of the main
body are clear. The
required formatting is
applied, although there
may be one or two
errors.

7.5 points
The sections of the main
body are organized to
reflect the main points of
the author. The required
format is applied
correctly. There are no
errors.

Mechanics of
Writing (includes
spelling,
punctuation,
grammar, and
language use)
Mechanics of
Writing (includes
spelling,
punctuation,
grammar, and
language use)

0 points
Surface errors are
pervasive enough that they
impede communication of
meaning. Inappropriate
word choice or sentence
construction is employed.

6 points
Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in
language choice (register) or
word choice are present.
Sentence structure is correct
but not varied.

6.6 points
Some mechanical errors or
typos are present, but they
are not overly distracting to
the reader. Correct and
varied sentence structure and
audience-appropriate
language are employed.

6.9 points
Prose is largely free of
mechanical errors,
although a few may be
present. The writer uses
a variety of effective
sentence structures and
figures of speech.

7.5 points
The writer is clearly in
command of standard,
written, academic
English.

APA Style
Citations
APA Style Citations
0 points
Sources are not cited
throughout. The required
style is not used for
citations.

6 points
Citation of sources is
incomplete. The use of the
required style for citation of
sources is inconsistent and
incorrect.

6.6 points
Most sources are cited. One
maybe missing. The required
style and format are typically
applied. Some errors are
present.

NUR 513 Describe the purpose of applying nursing theory to patient care.

NUR 513 Describe the purpose of applying nursing theory to patient care.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 513: Describe the purpose of applying nursing theory to patient care.

 

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.

Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.

One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.

I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.

In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.

Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).

Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).

Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.

I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.

As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.

It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category   5 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand. 
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.       The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.       The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.