Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NUR 513 Describe how the role of advanced registered nurse transformed over time

NUR 513 Describe how the role of advanced registered nurse transformed over time

Re: Topic 1 DQ 1

Historically, when one spoke of advanced practice nursing, they meant one of four roles; certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA), certified nurse mid-wife (CNM), clinical nurse specialist (CNS), or certified nurse practitioner (CNP). In 2004, the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) defined advanced practice nursing as “Any form of nursing intervention that influences health care outcomes for individuals or populations, including direct care of individual patients, management of care for individuals and populations, administration of nursing and health care organizations, and the development and implementation of health policy” (Denisco & Barker, 2016). Since this definition came

out many other nursing roles, such as nurse administrators and public health nurses have also been thought of as advanced practice nursing roles. Whereas advanced practice nursing used to be mainly reserved for clinical practice, it is now branching out into non-clinical roles. With the ever-expanding role of nurses coupled with the push to expand access to and decrease costs of health care there will likely be many new roles developed for nursing practice. These roles will require advanced degrees even if they are not in clinical areas, therefore, they too should be thought of as advanced practice nursing.

NUR 513 Describe how the role of advanced registered nurse transformed over time

NUR 513 Describe how the role of advanced registered nurse transformed over time

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NUR 513 Describe how the role of advanced registered nurse transformed over time

Denisco, S.M. and Barker, A.M. (2016). Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession. Jones and Bartlett Learning. https://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/jones-and-bartlett/2016/advanced-practice-nursing_essential-knowledge-for-the-profession_3e.php

RESPOND TO KELLY HERE

Hello Kelly,

I agree with you that nursing practice is any form of nursing intervention that is meant to influence the care outcomes. The nurse practice has been evolving overtime especially with the transformation of the healthcare systems and healthcare policies. In the current healthcare industry where the focus is on the patient, what is commonly referred to as patient centered approach has ensured that the patient is given autonomy to choose on the best care practice that is appropriate and improves the patient’s health condition (American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 2019). This has called upon the nurse training institutions to shift and adapt to the new and emerging trends in healthcare. The advanced nursing role has been the significant part that the Affordable Care Act aims to enhance health promotion measures among the aging US population (Woo et al., 2017). The research findings reveal that the advanced nursing role would be one of the professions at a highest demand by the year 2022.

NUR 513 Describe how the role of advanced registered nurse transformed over time

References

American Association of Nurse Practitioners. (2019). Scope of Practice for Nurse Practitioners. American Association of Nurse Practitioners; AANP Website. https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/advocacy-resource/position-statements/scope-of-practice-for-nurse-practitioners

Woo, B. F. Y., Lee, J. X. Y., & Tam, W. W. S. (2017). The impact of the advanced practice nursing role on quality of care, clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and cost in the emergency and critical care settings: a systematic review. Human Resources for Health, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-017-0237-9

This week : CAT (150 WORDS)

This week : We will discuss how the role of advanced registered nurse transformed over time, considering various shifts in scope and expectations in the 20th and 21st centuries. We will also discuss different ways that will the advanced registered nurse role and responsibilities continue to evolve and emerge as the American health care system changes. Here is a CAT ( classroom assessment technique question for you to get additional participation points). Please respond in addition to your 2 main dbqs dq1 and dq2.

CAT #1

Explore the 4 APRN roles 🙂 of your personal interest.

 

RESPOND HERE TO THE CAT

The APRN roles which are the advanced roles include; certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA), certified nurse midwife (CNM), clinical nurse specialist (CNS) and certified nurse practitioner CNP). The advanced nurse roles have been traditionally entailing focus on the clinical procedures, advocating for better patient care, being case managers (Hu & Forgeron, 2018). Additionally, ADP is also expected to work in consultation and collaboration with other healthcare professionals. The roles entail a wide scope of practice and ideally, the learning is meant for advancement on the already available information. However, in the current situation the healthcare industry is approaching a new era as emphasized in the affordable care act which we still don’t know what will happen. The affordable care act insists on offering medical care that built on patient centeredness and care that is preventive rather than curative (Courtemanche et al., 2018). This is meant to tackle the rising number of the elderly population that is battling serious chronic illnesses that are associated with old age

References

Courtemanche, C., Marton, J., Ukert, B., Yelowitz, A., & Zapata, D. (2018). Effects of the Affordable Care Act on Health Care Access and Self-Assessed Health After 3 Years. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 55, 004695801879636. https://doi.org/10.1177/0046958018796361

Hu, J., & Forgeron, P. (2018). Thinking, educating, acting: Developing advanced practice nursing. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 5(2), 99–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.04.006

RE: TOPIC 1 DQ 2

Access The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health. Identify the two recommendations for nursing education you believe will be most effective or radical in creating change within the industry. Provide rationale based on your experience in practice. Do you agree or disagree with how the Institute of Medicine (IOM) describes the advanced practice registered nurse role evolving? Why or why not?

RESPONSE

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommends that, in order for the healthcare industry to meet the rising demand for quality and affordable care, there is need to redefine and redesign the nurse training framework to march with the emerging trends in healthcare. Among the recommendations for nursing education to promote effectiveness include expanding the nursing faculty and improve the capacity of the available nursing schools. Additionally, there is need to reframe the nurse training program to expand the scope of training and ensure that the nurses graduating with the BSN are well trained on incorporation of technology, research methods, basic statistical data analysis and interpretation and above all they are well equipped to provide education to the patients and emphasize the current role of nursing profession. According to the ACA, the nurses are not only supposed to offer intervention measures in terms of treatment and taking care of the sick but they should also put the preventive measures on the forefront of their care services. It is imperative that the nurse training institutions help the student nurses sharped their communication skills and instill some pedagogical skills to help them deliver the message of health promotion measures as a way of improving healthcare and promoting quality life (Cleveland et al., 2019). I do agree with the IOM on about the evolving role of the advanced nursing practice. The recommendations remove the restrictions on the scope of practice of the APRN and allows them to practice to the full extend of their education and training (Salmond & Echevarria, 2017).

 

References

Cleveland, K., Motter, T., & Smith, Y. (2019, May). Affordable Care: Harnessing the Power of Nurses. Ojin.nursingworld.org. https://ojin.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Vol-24-2019/No2-May-2019/Affordable-Care.html

Salmond, S. W., & Echevarria, M. (2017). Healthcare Transformation and Changing Roles for Nursing. Orthopaedic Nursing, 36(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1097/nor.0000000000000308

Name:  Discussion Rubric

  Excellent

90–100

Good

80–89

Fair

70–79

Poor

0–69

Main Posting:

Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s).

Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three current credible sources.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to most of the Discussion question(s).

Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three credible references.

31 (31%) – 34 (34%)

Responds to some of the Discussion question(s).

One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Cited with fewer than two credible references.

0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

Does not respond to the Discussion question(s).

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Contains only one or no credible references.

Main Posting:

Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Written clearly and concisely.

Contains no grammatical or spelling errors.

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Written concisely.

May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors.

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Written somewhat concisely.

May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Not written clearly or concisely.

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Posting:

Timely and full participation

9 (9%) – 10 (10%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts main Discussion by due date.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts main Discussion by due date.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Posts main Discussion by due date.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post main Discussion by due date.

First Response:

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

First Response:

Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.

Response is written in standard, edited English.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.

Response to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

First Response:

Timely and full participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Posts by due date.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.

Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Second Response:
Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.

Response is written in standard, edited English.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.

Response to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response:
Timely and full participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Posts by due date.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.

Total Points: 100

Name:  Discussion Rubric

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.