Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NSG 6430 W10 Assignment 2: Case Analysis

NSG 6430 W10 Assignment 2: Case Analysis

Presented the patient case in the assigned format.

Clearly and thoroughly presented the assessment, possible diagnoses, actual dx (differentials), and a plan of care.

Ensured that the overall presentation of information was well organized.

Cited at least five published articles to support the approach.

 

Some cases will describe a situation and leave you at the point where the main character in the case is contemplating some action or future event. Other cases will report on some action which has occurred in the past and inform you of the results. In either case, you should analyze the current situation, determining what has led up to the point at which the case leaves you, then consider future actions.

In developing your position, place yourself at the time of the case with the dilemma or the challenge as it faced the organization at that time. Where you have the benefit of hindsight, subsequent knowledge, or added research, this should be acknowledged. The content of your analysis should be organized as follows (YOU SHOULD USE THESE SUBHEADINGS IN YOUR CASE WRITE-UPS):

Analysis of Issues

In this section, you should use information presented in the case and concepts, theories, and/or past empirical research reported in the management and organizational behavior literature to understand why the problems and issues have developed and why they are important. The analysis of each issue should be developed to provide the necessary background to lead to defining one or more reasonable alternative solutions to the problem.

NSG 6430 W10 Assignment 2 Case Analysis

NSG 6430 W10 Assignment 2 Case Analysis

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NSG 6430 W10 Assignment 2: Case Analysis 

Some Helpful Hints:

  • Use concepts, theories, and/or empirical evidence reported in the management literature (our text and assigned readings) to provide a framework for your analysis and support for your conclusions.
  • Take care to use terms/concepts appropriately and precisely.
  • Base your analysis on facts and do not try to place blame.
  • Be careful not to make assumptions that cannot be supported by the facts in the case.

Again, please rely heavily on the concepts and models presented in the text and your readings. This will be important in grading your case analysis. The readings for this class represent the knowledge base for understanding what is happening in the case. The purpose of using cases to learn organizational behavior is to exercise your ability to apply this common knowledge base to organizational problems. If you do not explicitly state how you are applying this knowledge, I have no way of knowing how well you are learning it.

Recommended Actions:

Here you must be decisive. Your recommended actions will evolve out of your analysis of the issues in the case. You must decide what should be done (or what should have been done). Be very clear on why you have chosen this action. Justify your decision with facts from the case and concepts, models, and/or findings from the text and readings. Defend your recommendations with sound analyses and reasoning that recognizes both the pros and cons of the alternatives you choose.

Name:  Assignment Rubric

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Summarize your interpretation of the frequency data provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, and family income from prior month. 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, a summary of the frequency distributions for the variables presented.

The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, the number of times the value occurs in the data.

The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and an explanation of extreme values in describing intervals that sufficiently provides an analysis that fully supports the categorization of each variable value.

The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the areas described.

28 (28%) – 31 (31%)

The response accurately summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented.

The response accurately explains the number of times the value occurs in the data.

The response accurately explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and explains extreme values in describing intervals that provides an analysis which supports the categorization of each variable value.

The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the areas described.

25 (25%) – 27 (27%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented.

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the number of times the value occurs in the data.

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and inaccurately or vaguely explains extreme values.

An analysis that may support the categorization of each variable value is inaccurate or vague.

The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the areas described.

0 (0%) – 24 (24%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented, or it is missing.

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the number of times the value occurs in the data, or it is missing.

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and an explanation of extreme values, or it is missing.

An analysis that does not support the categorization of each variable values is provided, or it is missing.

The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the areas described, or it is missing.

Summarize your interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, race and ethnicity, currently employed, and family income from prior month. 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

The response accurately and clearly summarizes in detail the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided.

The response accurately and clearly evaluates in detail each of the variables presented, including an accurate and complete description of the sample size, the mean, the median, standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

The response accurately summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided.

The response accurately explains evaluates each of the variables presented, including an accurate description of the sample size, the mean, the median, standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided.

The response inaccurately or vaguely evaluates each of the variables presented, including an inaccurate or vague description of the sample size, the mean, the median, the standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided, or it is missing.

The response inaccurately and vaguely evaluates each of the variables presented, including an inaccurate and vague description of the sample size, the mean, the median, the standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data, or it is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Total Points: 100

Name:  Assignment Rubric

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.