NRS 493 Topic 7 DQ 1 Describe one internal and one external method for the dissemination of your evidence-based change proposal

NRS 493 Topic 7 DQ 1 Describe one internal and one external method for the dissemination of your evidence-based change proposal

NRS 493 Topic 7 DQ 1 Describe one internal and one external method for the dissemination of your evidence-based change proposal

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 493 Topic 7 DQ 1 Describe one internal and one external method for the dissemination of your evidence-based change proposal

Topic 7 DQ 1

May 30-Jun 1, 2022

Describe one internal and one external method for the dissemination of your evidence-based change proposal. For example, an internal method may be the hospital board, and an external method may be a professional nursing organization. Discuss why it is important to report your change proposal to both of these groups. How will your communication strategies change for each group?

Sharia Jones

Posted Date

Jun 4, 2022, 1:07 PM

Replies to Sharia Jones

Dissemination refers to the action or fact of spreading something, especially information, widely. More specifically, dissemination research is the scientific study of targeted distribution of information and intervention materials to a specific public health audience (Guerin, Glasgow, Tyler, et.al, 2022). Dissemination is the communication of clinical, research, and theoretical findings for the purpose of transitioning new knowledge to the point of care. There are both internal and external methods to disseminate information. Internal dissemination is sharing project information results within an organization. For example, an internal dissemination would be to increase the nurse’s abilities to use and apply the evidence. External dissemination focuses on increasing the reach of evidence and includes sharing information with individuals or groups outside of an organization (Sarver, McNett, 2019).

 

Internal audiences are those who share values or common points of interest and are the focus group for internal evidence dissemination and example are hospital boards. While external dissemination includes sharing information to individuals or groups outside of the organization. External audiences are stakeholders like professional nursing organizations. Dissemination of my change proposal to both internal and external stakeholders is key to the project’s implementation and success of outcomes. Communication strategies may vary with these groups, however, using targeted communication is key and involves tailoring your basic message both to your project goals and your target audience.

Dissemination of project outcomes is helpful because it allows for the sharing of appropriate information to the respective audience, allowing stakeholders to make informed decisions based on the positive and negative outcomes of the project (Estabrooks, Brownson & Pronk, 2018). Dissemination is a key component in the translation of evidence because if the translation is not disseminated, then no change in care will occur and innovations will not be adopted.

 

References

 

Estabrooks, P. A., Brownson, R. C., & Pronk, N. P. (2018). Dissemination and Implementation Science for Public Health Professionals: An Overview and Call to Action. Preventing chronic disease15, E162. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.180525

 

Guerin, R. J., Glasgow, R. E., Tyler, A., Rabin, B. A., & Huebschmann, A. G. (2022). Methods to improve the translation of evidence-based interventions: A primer on dissemination and implementation of science for occupational safety and health researchers and practitioners. Safety Science152https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105763

 

Sarver, Wendy & McNett, Molly. (2020). Determining the dissemination plan: Internal and external considerations. DOI10.1016/B978-0-12-816543-0.00007-8

Coraline Powell

replied toSharia Jones

Jun 5, 2022, 9:39 PM

  • Replies to Sharia Jones

Hello Sharia,

This was an agreeable summary of the discussion. I enjoyed reading it and fetching the concepts discussed. Certainly, increasing a nurse’s ability to use and apply knowledge within an organization is a great example of internal dissemination. This would qualify as it involves the sharing of the project results within that particular organization. To add, there are various specific techniques for both internal dissemination and external dissemination, and knowing your target is vital before choosing what technique one would go with (Sarver & McNett, 2020). This would be important in ensuring the success of the knowledge delivery. Internal targets have been characterized as those sharing similar points in a specific group or organization. For instance. this can be linked to nurses in a hospital as the group target for the transfer of information.

Additionally, the dissemination of information through communication strategies may be traditional or social media forms (Faerch & Kasper, 1984). Traditional media includes television, oral communication, publications, and phones. On the other hand, social media includes microblogs, web-based news outlets, and text messages. As mentioned, the choice of strategy would vary with each group.

NRS 493 Topic 7 DQ 1 Describe one internal and one external method for the dissemination of your evidence-based change proposal
NRS 493 Topic 7 DQ 1 Describe one internal and one external method for the dissemination of your evidence-based change proposal

Other than allowing stakeholders to make knowledgeable decisions on a particular project, dissemination is also vital in leveraging funding for statistics as well as increasing return on investment within the organizations involved. Moreover, the cost of data dissemination would reduce as the number of pre-set tables that they produce. For instance, when information is highlighted through media, this would definitely appeal to a greater audience and urge people to support data collectors’ efforts.

References

Faerch, C., & Kasper, G. (1984). TWO WAYS OF DEFINING COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES. Language Learning, 34(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb00995.x

Sarver, W., & McNett, M. (2020). Determining the dissemination plan: Internal and external considerations. Data for Nurses, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-816543-0.00007-8

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 493 Topic 7 DQ 1 Describe one internal and one external method for the dissemination of your evidence-based change proposal

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

Check Out Also: NRS 493 Topic 6 DQ 2 Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection