NRS 493 Topic 5 DQ 2 Technology is integral to successful implementation in many projects

Sample Answer for NRS 493 Topic 5 DQ 2 Technology is integral to successful implementation in many projects Included After Question

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 493 Topic 5 DQ 2 Technology is integral to successful implementation in many projects

Topic 5 DQ 2

May 16-20, 2022

Technology is integral to successful implementation in many projects, through either support or integration or both. Name at least one technology that could improve the implementation process and the outcomes of your capstone project change proposal. Do you plan to use this technology? If not, what are the barriers that prevent its use?

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NRS 493 Topic 5 DQ 2 Technology is integral to successful implementation in many projects

Title: NRS 493 Topic 5 DQ 2 Technology is integral to successful implementation in many projects

Raimol Joseph

Posted Date

May 22, 2022, 11:52 PM

Any type of new technology like phones, laptops, tablets, and computers would be significantly useful in improving the implementation program. My specific program is concerns the population that have low incomes and financial unstable therefore technology might not be the biggest advantage or successful move in implementing this specific change proposal. However, in order for this change proposal to become legitimate and gain the support and attention it needs to successfully jumpstart change in the targeted population, technology is necessary to advertise and market the program (The impact of technology in Healthcare 2022). By posting this plan on all various social media platforms and even starting a GoFundMe would not only spread the popularity and familiarity of this program by ths imple spreaf of information as was seen in sial movement like MeToo which is cost effective, reaches almost llmop

Expert, T. K. L. P. D., & Kenn3mony, T. (2020, November 26). What am I doing with my life? find your answer here. Lifehack. Retrieved May 23, 2022, from https://www.lifehack.org/713166/what-am-i-doing-with-my-life

The impact of technology in Healthcare. AIMS Education. (2022, May). Retrieved May 23, 2022, from https://aimseducation.edu/blog/the-impact-of-technology-on-healthcare

Sharia Jones

Posted Date

May 22, 2022, 6:46 PM

Replies to Raimol Joseph

The application of medical technology has played a critical role not only in enhancing health outcomes but also in reducing healthcare costs. Some medical technologies help facilitate early diagnosis and treatment of potentially chronic and fatal illnesses. One technology, if included in the implementation process that can lead to better outcomes of managing CAUTI bladder scanning technology (Secretariat, 2016). Bladder scanners are used to assess and confirm urinary retention before placing a catheter to address suspected urinary retention in order to reduce unnecessary catheterization when the bladder’s volume is not the cause of the patient’s symptoms. Portable bladder scanners use ultrasound, a noninvasive way to determine the volume of urine remaining in the bladder after voiding (i.e., postvoid residual) to inform whether a urinary catheterization is needed.

I plan to incorporate bladder scanning technology in my change proposal project. Portable bladder ultrasounds will be used in an inpatient rehabilitation unit to determine whether a patient has sufficient urinary retention to justify catheterization. According to the AHRQ (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality), Nurse-driven protocols and handheld bladder scanners have been shown to reduce the risk of CAUTI (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2022).

References

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2022). Technical Interventions to Prevent CAUTI. https://www.ahrq.gov/hai/cauti-tools/guides/implguide-pt3.html

Secretariat, M. A. (2016). Portable Bladder Ultrasound: An Evidence-Based Analysis. Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series, 6(11), 1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3379524

Natalie Ripley

replied toSharia Jones

May 22, 2022, 7:25 PM

Replies to Sharia Jones

Sharia, bladder scanning via portable scanners is a wonderful use of technology to improve patient outcomes. We use our bladder scanner often on our unit, not only to assess retention and the need to insert a new catheter but also after foley removal to assess post-void retention. I work at a trauma level 1 acute care facility with 600 + beds and we have one bladder scanner for the 30 beds on our surgical oncology unit. In long-term care facilities, the use of bladder scanners in long-term care facilities would be beneficial given the level of urinary tract infections among the aging population. The article by Christianson and colleagues states, “going forward, staff education about continence care including the use of bladder scanners, as well as exploring scopes of practice are needed for effective assessment, management, and treatment of continence in LTC settings” (Christianson et al., 2021).

The stakeholders, leadership to purchase the bladder scanners, managers to ensure education on the use of bladder scanners, and nurses willing to implement the use of bladder scanners on patients in need of assessment.

Reference

Christianson, T. M., Hoot, T. J., & Todd, M. (2021). Understanding Nursing Knowledge of Continence Care and Bladder Scanner Use in Long-Term Care: An Evaluation Study. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, 7, 233372142110460. https://doi.org/10.1177/23337214211046090

Coraline Powell

replied toSharia Jones

May 22, 2022, 9:32 PM

Replies to Sharia Jones

Hello Sharia,

The use of technology in healthcare is instrumental. Not only does technology improve the efficiency of healthcare, it also empowers nurses in making clinical decisions. For instance, there are those technologies like Medscape which provide a host of medical information that nurses can use to augment clinical decision making and thus, enhance the quality of care that the nurse delivers. That said, as your technology directly involves patients, there are a number of considerations that you have to make. First, patient perceptions of technology vary and there are those that have yet to build a positive perception and relationship with technology (Curtis et al., 2019). This would significantly influence how receptive they are to the use of technology and this would also influence how effective the technologies are. In this case, it is important to appreciate that as a nurse, your role now extends beyond just

administering the technology. You have to ensure that the patients are receptive to the said technology and this includes educating the patient on the technology, and empowering the patient to ensure that they cooperate it the intervention.

It is also important that you become more culturally competent and this entails understanding that not everyone has the same experience with technology as we do. This will then involve ensuring that we assess the type of relationship that our patients share with technology and then chart a path that is mutually beneficial for both the nurse and the patient.

References

Curtis, E., Jones, R., Tipene-Leach, D., Walker, C., Loring, B., Paine, S. J., & Reid, P. (2019). Why cultural safety rather than cultural competency is required to achieve health equity: a literature review and recommended definition. International journal for equity in health, 18(1), 174. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1082-3

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 493 Topic 5 DQ 2 Technology is integral to successful implementation in many projects

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable	No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions. Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Application of Course Knowledge – Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources; Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources. Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content	Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson. Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson	Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post. Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life	Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category	5	4	3	2	0
Interactive Dialogue Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days. *(5 points possible per graded thread)*	Exceeds minimum post requirements Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days. Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days Replies to a question posed by a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days. The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty	Has only one post for the week Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments	Does not post to the thread No connections are made to the topic
	Minus 1 Point	Minus 2 Point	Minus 3 Point	Minus 4 Point	Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted. Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition	2-3 errors in APA format. Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors. Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.	4-5 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is somewhat focused.	6-7 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.	8-10 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.	Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format. Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style does not facilitate communication. The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
	0 points lost				-5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements *per discussion thread*	The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.				The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement *per discussion thread*	The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.				The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

Also Check Out: NRS 493 Topic 5 DQ 1 Stakeholder support is necessary for a successful project implementation