NRS 493 Topic 5 DQ 1 Stakeholder support is necessary for a successful project implementation

NRS 493 Topic 5 DQ 1 Stakeholder support is necessary for a successful project implementation

NRS 493 Topic 5 DQ 1 Stakeholder support is necessary for a successful project implementation

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 493 Topic 5 DQ 1 Stakeholder support is necessary for a successful project implementation

Topic 5 DQ 1

May 16-18, 2022

Stakeholder support is necessary for a successful project implementation. Consider your internal stakeholders, such as the facility, unit, or health care setting where the change proposal is being considered, and your external stakeholders, like an individual or group outside the health care setting. Why is their support necessary to the success of your change proposal, and how you will go about securing that support?

Sharia Jones

Posted Date

May 22, 2022, 6:09 PM

Individuals or groups and organizations that have an interest in making decisions that affect the healthcare industry and its subsidiaries are called stakeholders. Stakeholders in healthcare play a major role in the direction of the healthcare industry as their support is critical to provide funding, support, strategic direction and solutions as it pertains to the healthcare Industry (Lübbeke, Carr, & Hoffmeyer, 2019). While obvious stakeholders include patients and care givers, it also extends further to include nurses, doctors, employers, community leaders and entities such as insurance companies.

Internal stakeholders for my capstone change proposal in the rehab hospital include rehab nurses, doctors, managers, and administrators. Their support is necessary in planning and execution of change proposal implementation. Studies support the concept of a stakeholder analysis which can be a critical success factor that should be included in every change proposal because it allows you to understand the needs and perspectives of these decision makers, as well as other individuals who influence and are influenced by the change proposal (Panorama Consulting Group, 2021).

 

References

 

Lübbeke, A., Carr, A. J., & Hoffmeyer, P. (2019). Registry stakeholders. EFORT open reviews, 4(6), 330–336. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180077

 

Panorama Consulting Group. (2021). The Role Of A Stakeholder Analysis In Change Management [4 Reasons It’s Essential].  https://www.panorama-consulting.com/stakeholder-analysis-in-change-management

Coraline Powell

Posted Date

May 20, 2022, 7:27 PM

Replies to Sharia Jones

Stakeholders play a vital role in determining. the trajectory of any change project. This is because they are directly in the line of implementation and both their actions or inactions could influence the outcome of the case. In any implementation program there are internal stakeholders and external stakeholders. Internal stakeholders are those that are directly affected by the implementation of the project (Yang et al., 2022). External stakeholders, on the other hand, are not directly affected, but are bound to be somehow affected by the actions of the implementation.

In my change project, some of the direct stakeholders include smokers, nurses and the healthcare institution (Spaglietti & Marino, 2022). First the support of smokers to this intervention plays a vital role in ensuring that the project has adequate support and thus, this would ensure that the project records significant outcomes. When the smokers do not cooperate, nor do they participate and as a result, there are a small number of participants, this ultimately leads to adverse outcomes as it will be difficult to assess the impact of the project.

Nurses on the other hand are vital to the project as they are the implementers of the project. Lack of nurse support will adversely affect the implication of the project (Cutill, 2020). In healthcare, nurses are the most important sources of education of patients. Therefore, when an intervention requires education, such as this one, nurses are at the frontline of implementation and thus, their cooperation is vital.

The healthcare organizations that are hosting these interventions are also fundamental. While it is professionals such as nurses and doctors that implement projects, it is healthcare organizations that provide both the resources and platform needed for the implementation of these projects and thus, cooperation and support from healthcare organizations vital for the success of their programs.

The major external stakeholder that would be influenced by the project is the government. The government is a healthcare payer, and it at times absorb the costs of care, specially through uncompensated care (Dielman et al., 2020). Support by the government through things such as relaxing regulation to allow for such projects is vital as it ensures that nurses do not experience any barriers when attempting to implement the project.

Another vital external stakeholder is the larger society. These stakeholders play a vital role in terms of motivating the internal and external stakeholders to support the project. The members of the public motivate action by hospitals, nurses, patients and the government by working together to create a live support for an intervention. This will motivate action by internal stakeholders. For instance, members of the public can rally together and advocate against smoking in order to minimize the effects of secondhand smoke and this would motivate the smokers to seek help through the intervention and cease smoking in order to comply with public interests.

References

Cutilli C. C. (2020). Excellence in Patient Education: Evidence-Based Education that “Sticks” and Improves Patient Outcomes. The Nursing clinics of North America, 55(2), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2020.02.007

Dieleman, J. L., Cao, J., Chapin, A., Chen, C., Li, Z., Liu, A., Horst, C., Kaldjian, A., Matyasz, T., Scott, K. W., Bui, A. L., Campbell, M., Duber, H. C., Dunn, A. C., Flaxman, A. D., Fitzmaurice, C., Naghavi, M., Sadat, N., Shieh, P., Squires, E., … Murray, C. (2020). US Health Care Spending by Payer and Health Condition, 1996-2016. JAMA, 323(9), 863–884. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.0734

Saglietti, M., & Marino, F. (2022). Accomplishing Intergroup Relations in Group Homes: A Discursive Analysis of Professionals Talking About External and Internal Stakeholders. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 784345. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.784345

Yang, Y., Yang, F., & Zhao, X. (2022). The impact of the quality of environmental information disclosure on financial performance: the moderating effect of internal and external stakeholders. Environmental science and pollution research international, 10.1007/s11356-022-20553-y. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20553-y

Natalie Ripley

replied toCoraline Powell

May 20, 2022, 8:16 PM

Replies to Coraline Powell

Coralline, in my experience I find that lifetime smokers are the hardest patient population to reform. I understand that the tobacco industry purposely included addictive ingredients into their products therefore making it more difficult for their consumers to quit smoking. However, it still surprises me that my cancer patients continue to smoke. My diabetic patients continue to smoke. And my cardiac patients continue to smoke. Education is extremely important but so are tangible resources for smokers to quit, like providing nicotine patches/gum, support group information and accessible follow up visits to healthcare providers. My grandmother would put on her big coat in the winter and stand in our backyard to smoke in the freezing winter because my mother would not allow her to smoke inside our house. My grandmother eventually died of pancreatic cancer, which is prevalent among smokers.

This past Thanksgiving we received a patient on our floor for a serious wound infection two months post op from a double mastectomy. The patient was with us until February and her wound had not improved much, despite the debridements, hyperbaric therapy & wound vac. This patient continued to go outside with family members and smoke (yet always denying it). She would take her oral chemotherapy drug, have her wound dressings changed and then smoke whenever she could sneak away.

 

I’ve realized how much a person’s mental strength and mental health plays in to making choices for physical health. Smoking is a very difficult habit to break. I wish you all the best in your capstone change topic to improve the health of this patient population.

  • Sharia Jones

replied toNatalie Ripley

May 20, 2022, 10:49 PM

  • ·

Replies to Natalie Ripley

Hello Natalie,

Thank you for sharing your experience regarding your realization of how much a person’s mental strength and mental health plays in to making choices for physical health. This is the very reason why a multidimensional approach to wellness, that cares for the whole person’s physical, mental, emotional, social, intellectual, and spiritual wellbeing, is essential to optimal outcomes. Mental health plays a huge role in your general well-being, furthermore, a healthy mental state can help prevent serious health conditions.

A study found that positive psychological well-being can reduce the risks of heart attacks and strokes.

On the other hand, poor mental health can lead to poor physical health or harmful behaviors.

NRS 493 Topic 5 DQ 1 Stakeholder support is necessary for a successful project implementation
NRS 493 Topic 5 DQ 1 Stakeholder support is necessary for a successful project implementation

For example, depression has been linked to many chronic illnesses including diabetes, asthma, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and arthritis and Schizophrenia has also been linked to a higher risk of heart and respiratory (Mental Health Foundation, 2022).

 

References

 

Mental Health Foundation. (2022). Physical health and mental health. https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/a-to-z/p/physical-health-and-mental-health

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 493 Topic 5 DQ 1 Stakeholder support is necessary for a successful project implementation

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

Also Check Out: NRS 493 Topic 4 DQ 2 Compare and contrast two change theories