NRS 451 DQ 3 Review your state's mandated reporter statute

NRS 451 DQ 3 Review your state’s mandated reporter statute

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 451 DQ 3 Review your state’s mandated reporter statute

Review your state’s mandated reporter statute. Provide details about this in your post. If faced with a mandated reporter issue, what are the steps in reporting the issue? Create a mandated reporter scenario and post it. Respond to one of your peer’s scenarios using the guidelines for submission/reporting in your state. Be sure to include a reference to your state’s website related to mandated reporting.

Dorothy Ticharwa

Posted Date

Feb 19, 2022, 11:20 PM

Unread

A mandated reporter is anyone who has a full, intermittent, or occasional responsibility for tha care or custody of an incapacitated, or dependent adult. A mandated reporter states that all licensed healthcare professionals, including but not limited to: Physicians, Nurses, Mental Health Professionals, EMTs, paramedics, medical examiners – all employees in a long‐term health facility, social worker, marriage & family consular, childcare custodians, elder or dependent adult, employee of a protective service or law enforcement agency. I am in the State of Maine and Maine law requires hat certain people report immediately to the Adult Protective Services when the person knows or has reasonable cause to suspectthat an incapacitated or dependent adult has been or is likely to be abused. Many states, including Maine, require that a mandatory reporter provides his or her name and contact information during the initial report.

I once took care of a 76 year old patient who was admitted from his family home where he lived with his grandchildren. Patient was admitted for severe malnutrition, altered mental status with confusion. Patient had autism, was non-verbal and was impulsive to healthcare staff, as we tried to give him care, however he later on calmed down and became more relaxed around health care workers. He showed signs of elderly abuse and I had to let the Nurse Manager know before i could proceed to Adult Protective Services because Maine State requires immediate reporting, of any patient who is admitted and requires the medications and I am also a Mandated Reporter. However it is a criminal offence to withhold reporting child/adult abuse and it also predisposes further child or adullt abuse, if action is not taken.

Below are the details of the contact details to report a child or any individual suspected of being emotionall or physically, sexually, and financially abused.

REFERENCES:

Mandated Reporter Information Department of Health and Human Services. Accessed 2/20/2022 https://www.maine.gov/dhhs/ocfs/provider-resources/reporting-suspected-child-abuse-and-neglect/mandated -reporter-information

DHHS Phone Number: (207) 287-3707

Jaspreet Kaur

Posted Date

Feb 18, 2022, 7:32 PM

Read

Replies to Dorothy Ticharwa

Mandatory reporters are the ones who are required to report legally by law, failure to do so consider a crime. Their job is to report any suspected abuse, neglect, financial abuse not to investigate even when they are just suspect (Marschall, 2021). Every state in United State has a specific law that is mandatory and reports and ways of reporting. All healthcare workers (physicians, nurses, caregivers), teachers, social workers, therapists are Washington State’s mandatory reporters should report any suspected abuse, neglect, abandonment of any vulnerable adult or child. In Washington state suspect abuse in any care services facility report can be called by calling toll-free number 1-800-562-6078 or online report. For reporting person name, address, contact information, reason of concern, and report name and number for investigate purposes. The reporter’s information should be kept confidential unless court action or law enforcement has been called in. In cases when vulnerable children or adults are suspected of abuse or neglect in their home reports can be made to adult protective or child protective services (Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, n.d.).

In case of scenario, one female older adult age 65 years admitted to hospital with fall from a private residence, upon assessment her

NRS 451 DQ 3 Review your state's mandated reporter statute — NRS 451 DQ 3 Review your state’s mandated reporter statute

condition with weight loss, bilateral feet gangrene, and bad odor, extremely poor hygienic condition suspected case of abuse or neglect, in this case, adult protective services called (Washington State Health Care Authority, 2021).

Reference: Marschall, A. (2021). What is mandated reporting? Verywellmind.com. Relationship: Violence and Abuse. https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-mandated-reporting-5206106

Washington State Department of Social and Health Services. (n.d.). Reporting abuse as a mandatory reporter. https://www.dshs.wa.gov/altsa/home-and-community-services/reporting-abuse-mandatory-reporter

Washington State Health Care Authority. (2021). Adult abuse and neglect reporting: Adult protective services (APS). https://www.hca.wa.gov/health-care-services-supports/program-administration/adult-abuse-and-neglect-reporting-adult

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 451 DQ 3 Review your state’s mandated reporter statute

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable	No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions. Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Application of Course Knowledge – Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources; Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources. Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content	Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson. Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson	Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post. Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life	Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category	5	4	3	2	0
Interactive Dialogue Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days. *(5 points possible per graded thread)*	Exceeds minimum post requirements Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days. Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days Replies to a question posed by a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days. The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty	Has only one post for the week Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments	Does not post to the thread No connections are made to the topic
	Minus 1 Point	Minus 2 Point	Minus 3 Point	Minus 4 Point	Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted. Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition	2-3 errors in APA format. Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors. Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.	4-5 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is somewhat focused.	6-7 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.	8-10 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.	Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format. Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style does not facilitate communication. The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
	0 points lost				-5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements *per discussion thread*	The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.				The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement *per discussion thread*	The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.				The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

Also Read: NRS 451 DQ 2 Compare two leadership theories