NRS 433V Topic 4 DQ 1 Compare independent variables, dependent variables, and extraneous variables

NRS 433V Topic 4 DQ 1 Compare independent variables, dependent variables, and extraneous variables

NRS 433V Topic 4 DQ 1 Compare independent variables, dependent variables, and extraneous variables

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 433V Topic 4 DQ 1 Compare independent variables, dependent variables, and extraneous variables

Topic 4 DQ 1

Aug 15-17, 2022

Compare independent variables, dependent variables, and extraneous variables. Describe two ways that researchers attempt to control extraneous variables. Support your answer with peer-reviewed articles.

Krishna Turner

Aug 18, 2022, 7:40 PM

Replies to Krishna Turner

The independent variable is the experimental or predictor variable, example is a person age, you cannot change someone age but what can be change is their lifestyle such as diets, career, or where they live. The independent variable is often manipulated in the research to observe the effect on the dependent variable. The dependent variable is considered the outcome variable. It brings on various standards in response to the independent variable. The extraneous variable is thought to be a variable that can impact the relationship between the independent and dependent variables which can be controlled either through research design or statistical procedures that were not anticipated or recognized at the beginning of the study (GCU,2018).

 

Experimental design is one-way to control extraneous variables this is done by designing an experiment in which individuals are randomly assigned to treatment groups and such that researchers are also blind to which persons belong to which group, this should diminish the problem of experimental favoritism (Zach, 2021).

 

Having an unchanging environment is another way to control extraneous variables. Every single person should be able to participate in an experiment in the specific same environment, examples such as the same lighting conditions, same noise levels, same temperature, and same number of potential distractions. This should minimize the effect of situational variables and stress attributes (Zach, 2021).

References

Grand Canyon University (Ed). (2018). Nursing research: Understanding methods for best practice. Retrieved from https://lc.gcumedia.com/nrs433v/nursing-research-understanding-methods-for-best-practice/v1.1

 

Zach. (2021, February 19). Extraneous variable: Definition & examples. Statology. Retrieved August 18, 2022, from https://www.statology.org/extraneous-variable/

 

Manyara Chinyoka

replied toKrishna Turner

Aug 18, 2022, 8:41 PM

  • Replies to Krishna Turner

If you do not control the extraneous variables,they may influence the outcome s of the study, and you may not be able to demonstrate that your results are really an effect of your independent variable. Level of obedience can be influenced by the external circumstances rather than the personalities of the people involved tis is situational variables.Your example is of controlling the environment where the research takes place and keeping it consistent are correct

  • Dilshoda Osorio

replied toKrishna Turner

Aug 19, 2022, 8:24 AM

  • Replies to Krishna Turner

Krishna, thank you for your post. Would like add some more info with the examples.

The independent variable is the controllable variable used to test how the dependent variable is affected in scientific research. The dependent variable is the variable under test that depends on the independent variable, and any changes in the latter affect it. In research, the dependent variables’ outcomes are recorded when the independent variable is adjusted to different levels (Flannely, 2014).

Extraneous variables are the variables in scientific research that are not intentionally studied. The goal of scientific research is to test the effects of the independent variable on the dependent variable. However, these variables affect or interfere with the outcomes of the experiment and are usually not anticipated (Flannely, 2014).

For example: The researcher were studying the effect of gender on response times, with the theory that females would be slower than males. There were 30 participants in a public computer room throughout the day. The dependent variable is the response time, the independent variable is the gender of the participants and extraneous variables could be the time of day or how noisy the computer room is.

Flannelly, L. T., Flannelly, K. J., & Jankowski, K. R. B. (2014). Independent, Dependent, and Other Variables in Healthcare and Chaplaincy Research. Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, 20(4), 161–170. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/08854726.2014.959374

 

 

  • Calorine Mahungana

replied toKrishna Turner

Aug 19, 2022, 10:06 AM

  • Replies to Krishna Turner

Krishna,

I agree that experimental design is one way of controlling extraneous variables done by designing an experiment in which individuals are randomly assigned to treatment groups. I would like to add that experimental design play a crucial role in reducing or completely removing the impact of extraneous variables. There may be situations when experimental design together with other methods like randomization and matching do not show any significant outcomes (dissertationcanada.com). It brings the entire research into question as then casual inferences are difficult to make. Another method that can work to bring down the effect of extraneous variables is called statistical control. Among various statistical tools and techniques, Analysis of Covariance (ANOVA) helps in reducing the impact of the extraneous factors on the study.

Reference

Methods to control extraneous variables- Dissertation Canada.

Methods to Control Extraneous Variables

  • Kadija Tejan-deen

replied toKrishna Turner

Aug 19, 2022, 11:09 PM

  • Replies to Krishna Turner

Hello Krishna,

Your post is very informative and I really like your examples of controlling extraneous variables. As you mentioned it’s essential to

NRS 433V Topic 4 DQ 1 Compare independent variables, dependent variables, and extraneous variables
NRS 433V Topic 4 DQ 1 Compare independent variables, dependent variables, and extraneous variables

apply adequate control in this area of research in order to ensure accurate results (Schmidt, 2018). In learning about extraneous variables, it seems like controlling this area of study can be very time-consuming as these types of variables seem to be very prevalent. I like your suggested method of randomization to help prevent extraneous variables. Even if randomization is used though couldn’t there still be extraneous variables that still come into play? For instance, one study looking at the cause of maternal deaths identified the type of delivery as being an extraneous variable. It seems like even if the sample is randomized these extraneous variables could still affect the outcome. I’m so new to this and it seems so complicated to conduct a study that produces accurate results.

References:

Mawarti, Y., Utarini, A., & Hakimi, M. (2017). Maternal care quality in near miss and maternal mortality in academic public tertiary hospital in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 17(149). https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-017-1326-4#Tab4

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 433V Topic 4 DQ 1 Compare independent variables, dependent variables, and extraneous variables

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

Read Also: NRS 433V Topic 3 DQ 1 Provide examples of experimental and nonexperimental research design