Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NRS 433 Assignment Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations GCU

NRS 433 Assignment Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations GCU

Assessment Description

Write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two qualitative research studies. Use the “Research Critique Guidelines – Part 1” document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide rationale, include examples, and reference content from the studies in your responses.

Use the practice problem and two qualitative, peer-reviewed research article you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.

In a 1,000–1,250 word essay, summarize two qualitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.

You are required to cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Attachments

NRS-433V-RS2-ResearchCritiqueGuidelinesPar

 

Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations – Rubric

Criteria Description

Qualitative Studies

  1. 5: Excellent

9.5 points

Two articles are presented. Both articles are based on qualitative research.

  1. 4: Good

8.93 points

N/A

  1. 3: Satisfactory

7.89 points

N/A

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

7.13 points

Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one article is based on qualitative research.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles presented use qualitative research.

Criteria Description

Background of Study

  1. 5: Excellent

19 points

Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

  1. 4: Good

17.86 points

Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

15.77 points

Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

14.25 points

Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete.

Criteria Description

Article Support of Nursing Practice Issue

  1. 5: Excellent

28.5 points

A clear discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate strong support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles strongly compare to those identified in the PICOT question.

  1. 4: Good

26.79 points

A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Minor detail or rational is needed for clarity or support.

NRS 433 Assignment Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations GCU

NRS 433 Assignment Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations GCU

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NRS 433 Assignment Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations GCU

  1. 3: Satisfactory

23.65 points

A general discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate general support in answering the proposed PICOT question. It is unclear how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Some rational or information is needed.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

21.38 points

A summary of how articles support the PICOT question is presented. It is unclear how the articles can be used to answer the proposed PICOT question. Significant information and detail are required.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is incomplete.

Criteria Description

Method of Study

  1. 5: Excellent

28.5 points

A thorough discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is described in detail. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. The discussion demonstrates a solid understanding of research methods.

  1. 4: Good

26.79 points

A discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is generally described. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. There minor are inaccuracies. Some detail is required for accuracy or clarity.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

23.65 points

A general discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is summarized. A benefit and a limitation of each method are summarized. There some inaccuracies or partial omissions. More information is needed.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

21.38 points

A partial summary of the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is incomplete. A benefit and a limitation of each method are omitted or incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Discussion on the method of study for each article is omitted. The comparison of study methods is omitted or incomplete.

Criteria Description

Results of Study

  1. 5: Excellent

28.5 points

Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

  1. 4: Good

26.79 points

Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

23.65 points

Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is generally presented. Overall, the discussion includes some relevant details and explanation.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

21.38 points

A summary of the study results includes findings and implications for nursing practice but lacks relevant details and explanation. There are some omissions or inaccuracies.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete.

Criteria Description

Ethical Considerations

  1. 5: Excellent

28.5 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. A detailed discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is presented.

  1. 4: Good

26.79 points

Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is presented; some detail in needed for accuracy or clarity.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

23.65 points

Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is discussed but there are some inaccuracies, or some information is needed.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

21.38 points

Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is summarized but there are significant inaccuracies or omissions.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is incomplete. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles presented in the essay is incomplete.

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

  1. 5: Excellent

9.5 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

  1. 4: Good

8.93 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

7.89 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

7.13 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

  1. 5: Excellent

9.5 points

Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

  1. 4: Good

8.93 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

7.89 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

7.13 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

  1. 5: Excellent

9.5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

  1. 4: Good

8.93 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

7.89 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

7.13 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Criteria Description

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

  1. 5: Excellent

9.5 points

All format elements are correct.

  1. 4: Good

8.93 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

7.89 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

7.13 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

  1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

  1. 5: Excellent

9.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

  1. 4: Good

8.93 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

  1. 3: Satisfactory

7.89 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

  1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

7.13 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.