NRS 430 Discussion: Events Influencing Advancement of Nursing

Sample Answer for NRS 430 Discussion: Events Influencing Advancement of Nursing Included After Question

Topic 3 DQ 1

Description:

How has nursing practice evolved over time? Discuss the key leaders and historical events that have influenced the advancement of nursing, nursing education, and nursing roles that are now part of the contemporary nursing profession.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NRS 430 Discussion: Events Influencing Advancement of Nursing

Title: NRS 430 Discussion: Events Influencing Advancement of Nursing

Dorothea Orem’s self-care deficit theory is a notable contribution to nursing practice, and I am keen to understand how she developed this theory and refined her ideas over time. I know that a conversation with Orem would be a great opportunity to gain insights into her experience as a nurse and how it influenced her theoretical work. My main goal in speaking with Orem would be to improve my patient care by helping them achieve better self-care. Orem’s work on self-care has had a significant and lasting impact on nursing theory, and speaking with her could provide valuable insights into how nursing theory is developed and applied in practice. By understanding the development of her self-care deficit theory, I can better understand how to apply this theory to my own work as a nurse. Furthermore, I am interested in learning more about the challenges that Orem faced when developing her theory and how she overcame them.

I would also like to know how Orem’s self-care deficit theory has been received by the nursing community and how it has influenced nursing practice over time. Additionally, I would like to ask Orem about the relationship between patient empowerment and self-care, and how nurses can encourage patients to take an active role in their own care. This would help me to better engage with my patients and support them in achieving better outcomes. Overall, a conversation with Dorothea Orem would be a valuable opportunity to gain insights into nursing theory and its practical applications. It would help me to improve my patient care and to better understand the relationship between patients and their ability to care for themselves. Orem’s work has had a lasting impact on the field of nursing, and I am excited to learn more about her experiences and insights.

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NRS 430 Discussion: Events Influencing Advancement of Nursing

Title: NRS 430 Discussion: Events Influencing Advancement of Nursing

If I could have sat and talked to one of the nursing theorists it would be Faye Abdellah. The reason for her interest in the profession is profound . She witnessed an explosion and could not have done anything to help. She vowed to herself she would never be hopeless again and decided to pursue the Nursing profession. I am very impressed with the level of intelligence she showcased for someone in that Era especially for recognizing the importance of research. Developing Abdellah’s Typology of 21 Nursing Problems was formidable. It has always been my belief that treating the disease  should not be the focus but  treating the person providing holistic care and this is what the typology fosters. Patients come in presenting with whatever symptoms in the hospital but there are factors outside of what they present that are affecting them, maybe they have kids at home and no babysitter, some maybe be on the verge of becoming homeless. When we overlook these things and focus on only what the patient came in with , we do not send a whole patient home and we do not meet all of their needs. As a consultant and educator with seminars around the world she made the profession more visible. I admire her for furthering herself academically despite all deterrents. She was a well educated person; she had three degrees from Columbia University: a bachelor of science degree in nursing in 1945, a master of arts degree in physiology in 1947, and a doctor of education degree in 1955 (Craddock, 2013). She could have been anything but she chose to remain in this profession.If i could ask her one question right now it would be what kept her going. Today we have everything at our fingertips, education at our disposal, and access to so much technology wise, better pay, more resources.But i find it almost impossible to accomplish one quarter of what she  has  accomplished. Maybe I might just be inspired by what motivated her.

Reference

Abdellah, F.G., Beland, I.L., Martin, A., & Matheney, R.V. Patient-centered approaches to nursing (2nd ed.). New York: Mac Millan. 1968.

Craddock, J. (2013). Encyclopedia of world biography supplement. Detroit, Mich.: Gale. https://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3435000010.html

Description:

This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.

Nursing theories are tested and systematic ways to implement nursing practice. Select a nursing theory and its conceptual model. Prepare a 10-15 slide PowerPoint in which you describe the nursing theory and its conceptual model and demonstrate its application in nursing practice. Include the following:

1. Present an overview of the nursing theory. Provide evidence that demonstrates support for the model’s efficacy in nursing practice. Explain how the theory proves the conceptual model.
2. Explain how the nursing theory incorporates the four metaparadigm concepts.
3. Provide three evidence-based examples that demonstrate how the nursing theory supports nursing practice. Provide support and rationale for each.

NRS 430 Discussion Events Influencing Advancement of Nursing
NRS 430 Discussion Events Influencing Advancement of Nursing

Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 430 Discussion: Events Influencing Advancement of Nursing

Description

Objectives:

1. Describe how historical events and nursing leaders have influenced the practice of nursing.
2. Evaluate the use of nursing theory in nursing practice.
3. Evaluate the use of conceptual models in nursing practice.

Dynamics in Nursing: Art and Science of Professional Practice

Description:

Read Chapter 2 in Dynamics in Nursing: Art and Science of Professional Practice.

Beginner’s Guide to PowerPoint – 2017 Tutorial

Description:

View “Beginner’s Guide to PowerPoint – 2017 Tutorial,” by Technology for Techers and Students (2017), located on the YouTube website.

Nursing Timeline

Description:

View “Nursing Timeline,” located on the Grand Canyon University website.

What Is Nursing?

Description:

Review “What Is Nursing,” located on the American Nurses Association (ANA) website.

Grand Canyon University College of Nursing and Health Care Professions Philosophy

Description:

Read “Grand Canyon University College of Nursing and Health Care Professions Philosophy.”

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.