NRS 429V W1 Assignment VARK Analysis Paper
Sample Answer for NRS 429V W1 Assignment VARK Analysis Paper Included After Question
Complete “The VARK Questionnaire: How Do I Learn Best?”
http://www.stellarleadership.com/docs/Approach%20to%20Learning/assessment/VARK%20Questionnare.pdf
1. Click “OK” to receive your questionnaire scores.
2. Once you have determined your preferred learning style, review the corresponding link to view your learning preference.
3. Review the other learning styles: visual, aural, read/write, kinesthetic, and multimodal (listed on the VARK Questionnaire Results page).
4. Compare your preferred learning strategies to the identified strategies for your preferred learning style.
5. Appraise how this awareness of learning attributes influences your perceptions of teaching and learning.
In a paper (750-1,000 words), summarize your analysis of this exercise. Include the following:
1. Provide a summary of your learning style.
2. List your preferred learning strategies.
3. Compare your preferred learning strategies to the identified strategies for your preferred learning style.
4. Discuss how the awareness of individual learning styles, preferences and strategies influence teaching (those who are in a position to teach) and learning (those who are in a position to learn).
5. Cite a minimum of three references in the paper.
Although the topic of this assignment refers to your individual learning style, avoid the use of first person voice (words such as, “I, we, our”) in your essay.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NRS 429V W1 Assignment VARK Analysis Paper
Title: NRS 429V W1 Assignment VARK Analysis Paper
A learning style refers to how different learners acquire, process, understand, and retain new information. It denotes the habitual cognitive and affective behaviors which influence how each learner interacts in learning environments or situations (Mangold et al., 2018). There are four primary learning styles: visual, auditory, tactile, and kinesthetic. Regarding learning styles, this paper will discuss the author’s learning style and preferred learning strategies and discuss how personal learning styles impact the level to which a learner can comprehend or carry out educational activities.
Personal Learning Style
The VARK questionnaire helps one identify their learning style by proposing the learning strategies one should employ to increase their capacity to understand and carry out the learning activities. According to the VARK questionnaire, I am a Very Strong Kinesthetic. The results were Visual-2, Aural-2, Read/Write- 2, and Kinesthetic-12. In the Kinesthetic learning style, the learner understands more effectively when experiences and real things are provided, even if presented as images or through screens (VARK, 2019). Individuals who fall under the Kinesthetic learning style prefer to learn through experiences and real things. From the VARK assessment, I realized that I prefer encountering experiences since they foster comprehension of concepts. Besides, I identify ideas as valuable if they appear real, practical, and relevant to my life experiences.
Preferred Learning Strategies
A learning strategy refers to a person’s approach of organizing and applying a specific set of skills to understand the content or achieve other tasks more effectively and efficiently in academic and non-academic environments. I prefer to learn how to solve a problem by being presented with a real case scenario and applying it to learn the concepts of addressing similar issues. Besides, I prefer learning through practical experiences because I can understand concepts better and retain them in the long term compared to when I read a book or listen to a lecture. I also grasp new information more effectively from practical learning sessions such as field practicum and projects. Furthermore, I prefer tutors and instructors who teach using demonstrations and provide real-life scenarios and guide the learner to apply the learned concept in solving an existing issue.
My preferred learning strategies compare to most strategies under the Kinesthetic learning style. For instance, the preferred strategies in the Kinesthetic learning style include using real things and experiences when presented through images and screens. Other preferred strategies include documentaries and autobiographies, applying theories before theoretical learning, demonstrations, and applying learned concepts (VARK, 2019). Furthermore, people with the kinesthetic preference would rather discuss real things in their lives, have their own experiences, carry out activities with others, and achieve things using actions(VARK, 2019). Like my preferences, kinesthetic individuals prefer solving practical problems and applying problem-solving approaches and desire to achieve measurable outcomes.
Effect on Educational Performance and Importance of Identifying Learning Styles for Learners as an Educator
A person’s learning style influences how they comprehend or carry out educational activities. A learner grasps the concepts more effectively when the teaching method is consistent with their learning style (Childs-Kean et al., 2020). Consequently, when the teaching method aligns with the learner’s learning style, they understand and perform educational activities more effectively than when forced to adjust to other learning styles. An educator should strive to understand the preferred learning styles of individual learners in order to modify the teaching style to suit each learner’s style. By identifying individual learning styles, the educator can plan the teaching session to incorporate teaching methods that match the learners’ learning styles (Childs-Kean et al., 2020). For instance, in a setting with learners having all the learning styles, the educator can include: chart and diagrams for visuals, a lecture and audio recordings for the aural, reading handouts and books for read/write, and case studies and demonstrations for the kinesthetic. By doing so, the educator will help each learner gain the most from the learning session.
Learning Styles and Health Promotion
Health providers conducting health promotion need to be familiar with the learning styles of the individuals receiving the health education. Understanding a patient’s learning style helps enhance their learning, understanding, and retention of the health messages. Retention of health promotion messages increases the likelihood of individuals implementing them to adopt healthy lifestyle choices (Bokhari & Zafar, 2019). Individuals tend to have a greater interest in health promotion activities if the provider’s teaching method is consistent with their learning styles. Learning styles influence the likelihood of behavioral change if the individual effectively understands and retains the health messages and applies them in making healthier choices (Bokhari & Zafar, 2019). For instance, if a diabetic patient with a visual preference is educated on diet and exercise planning using charts and diagrams, they are likely to retain the information and apply the concepts to change their lifestyle practices.
Different learning styles can be incorporated in health promotion using various teaching methods aiming at aura, visual, read/write, and hands-on. For instance, the provider can give a health talk to target aural learners and use posters and charts containing health messages for visual learners (Mangold et al., 2018). In addition, handouts and pamphlets can be provided to target read/write learners, and demonstrations can be used for kinesthetic learners.
Conclusion
Learning styles are a major element of the comprehensive approach that should be considered when planning and facilitating a learning program. My preferred learning style is Kinesthetic since I grasp and retain concepts better when I learn them from practical activities, real-life experiences, and scenarios. Individuals comprehend differently based on whether they learn best when they visualize, hear, read, or engage in practical activities. Therefore, the educator should consider the learner’s style to make the best out of the learning session.
References
Bokhari, N. M., & Zafar, M. (2019). Learning styles and approaches among medical education participants. Journal of education and health promotion, 8, 181. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_95_19
Childs-Kean, L., Edwards, M., & Smith, M. D. (2020). A Systematic Review of Learning Style Framework Use in Health Sciences Education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7885
Mangold, K., Kunze, K. L., Quinonez, M. M., Taylor, L. M., & Tenison, A. J. (2018). Learning Style Preferences of Practicing Nurses. Journal for nurses in professional development, 34(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1097/NND.0000000000000462
VARK Learn Limited. (2019). The VARK questionnaire. Retrieved from http://vark-learn.com/the-vark-questionnaire/
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 429V W1 Assignment VARK Analysis Paper
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | |||
| NRS-429VN | NRS-429VN-O504 | VARK Analysis Paper | 100.0 | |||
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (75.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (89.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) |
| Content | 80.0% | |||||
| Personal Learning Styles According to VARK Questionnaire | 20.0% | Personal learning style content is missing. Personal learning style presented is not reflective of VARK questionnaire. | Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified, but summary is incomplete. | Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and basic summary is provided. | Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and described. | Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and described in detail. Summary offers examples that display personal insight or reflection. |
| Preferred Learning Strategies | 20.0% | Personal learning strategy content is missing. | Personal learning strategy is partially described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is incomplete. | Personal learning strategy is summarized. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is generally described. | Personal learning strategy is described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is presented. | Personal learning strategy is clearly described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is detailed. Overall discussion demonstrates insight into preferred learning strategies and how these support preferred learning styles. |
| Learning Styles (Effect on educational performance and importance of identifying learning styles for learners as an educator) | 20.0% | Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is not presented. | Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is partially presented. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is unclear. There are inaccuracies. | Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is generally discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is generally established. There are minor inaccuracies. More rationale or evidence is needed for support. | Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is established. Some rationale or evidence is needed for support. | Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is thoroughly discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is clearly established. Strong rationale and evidence support discussion. |
| Learning Styles and Health Promotion (learning styles and importance to achieving desired outcome for learners, learning styles and effect on behavioral change, accommodation of different learning styles in health promotion) | 20.0% | Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in health promotion, the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes, and the accommodation of different learning styles is not discussed. | Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in health promotion and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is partially presented; a correlation has not been established. Accommodation of different learning styles is incomplete. There are inaccuracies. | Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in a health promotion, and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is generally presented; a general correlation has been established. More rationale or evidence is needed to fully establish correlation. Accommodation of different learning styles is summarized. | Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in a health promotion, and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is discussed; a correlation has been established. Accommodation of different learning styles is discussed. Some detail or minor support is needed. | Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in a health promotion, and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is discussed in detail. A strong correlation has been established. Accommodation of different learning styles is discussed. The narrative demonstrates insight into the importance of learning styles to health promotion and behavioral outcomes. |
| Organization and Effectiveness | 15.0% | |||||
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 5.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 5.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Format | 5.0% | |||||
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 2.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 3.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |