NRS 428 Discuss the Effectiveness of the U.S. Health Care System

NRS 428 Discuss the Effectiveness of the U.S. Health Care System

Sample Answer for NRS 428 Discuss the Effectiveness of the U.S. Health Care System Included After Question

Topic 4 DQ 1

Description:

 Research the delivery, finance, management, and sustainability methods of the U.S. health care system. Evaluate the effectiveness of one or more of these areas on quality patient care and health outcomes. Propose potential health care. Reform solution to improve effectiveness in the area you evaluated and predict the expected effect. Describe the effect of health care reform on the U.S. health care system and its respective stakeholders. Support your post with a peer-reviewed journal article.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NRS 428 Discuss the Effectiveness of the U.S. Health Care System

Title: NRS 428 Discuss the Effectiveness of the U.S. Health Care System

The healthcare system has had a continuous financial problem. This has ultimately compromised patient care and their outcomes. Presently, it is funded by insurance companies, federal programs, and out of pocket expenses paid by patients themselves. All Americans should have access to healthcare, but the debate is about who should pay for it. Most Americans work longer and harder for health care. Everyone should be treated equally and not judged by their income and be able to get insurance at the same quality as everyone else. The social determinants of health illustrate that there are many reasons why health is compromised. Many Americans have avoided addressing their health due to lack of insurance and expenses. The idea of universal healthcare is to have coverage for all eligible residents that covers medical, dental, and mental health care. Typically, costs are borne in the majority by publicly funded programs. Non inclusive, inequitable systems limit quality healthcare access to those who can afford it or have employer sponsored insurance. These policies exacerbate health disparities by failing to prioritize preventive measures at the environmental, policy, and individual level (Zieff et al., 2020). Universal healthcare will better facilitate and encourage sustainable, preventive health practices and be more advantageous for the long term public health and economy of the US.

 

Reference 

Zieff G, Kerr ZY, Moore JB, Stoner L. (2020). Universal Healthcare in the United States of America: A Healthy Debate. Medicina. 56(11):580. doi: 10.3390/medicina56110580.

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NRS 428 Discuss the Effectiveness of the U.S. Health Care System

Title: NRS 428 Discuss the Effectiveness of the U.S. Health Care System

The United States healthcare system is a primarily fee-for-service based system. In a fee-for-service system, providers and healthcare teams work as businesses that charge for each respective service. This model has many detrimental effects — “it creates incentives to raise prices and push up volumes, shortages of poorly compensated services such as primary care and behavioral health, and an undersupply of services in less financially attractive poor and rural communities.” (Blumenthal et al., 2020). This has been seen more and more in present days. Patients are sen as dollar signs rather than as humans. Increasing healthcare and insurance costs, rising prices on medical bills, and a mentality that revolves around getting patients in and out as quickly as possible in order to maximize volumes and, in turn, revenues, has created a system of inadequate and disproportionate healthcare that has become extremely ineffective. One proposal that could fix this situation is a transition to a single-payer universal healthcare system. This system is under a single company or entity — usually a government funded body. This system, which is widely used in other countries, can lower overall care costs and mitigate wasteful spending. Research has shown numerous advantages over the current fee-for-service system, including adequately “addressing the growing chronic disease crisis; mitigating the economic costs associated with said crisis; reducing the vast health disparities that exist between differing SES segments of the population; and increasing opportunities for preventive health initiatives.” (Zieff et al., 2020). These changes could also influence stakeholders. Their overall roles could potentially be altered, as the system reform would create new scenarios regarding compensation or reimbursement for services. One detriment for the citizens of the United States could be a potential tax increase as government investment would potentially increase in a transition to a single-payer system. Do the risks outweigh the benefits? Arguments can be made for either side, but one thing is certain: single-payer healthcare systems would allow low socioeconomic status individuals to get the necessary care they not only need, but also deserve.

 

References:

Blumenthal, D., Fowler, E. J., Abrams, M., & Collins, S. R. (2020). Covid-19 — implications for the health care system. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(15), 1483–1488. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsb2021088

Zieff, G., Kerr, Z. Y., Moore, J. B., & Stoner, L. (2020, October 30). Universal Healthcare in the United States of America: A healthy debate. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7692272/

A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NRS 428 Discuss the Effectiveness of the U.S. Health Care System

Title: NRS 428 Discuss the Effectiveness of the U.S. Health Care System

In conducting thorough research on the U.S. health care system, it is crucial to investigate various aspects such as delivery, finance, management, and sustainability methods. Understanding these key areas is essential to evaluate the effectiveness and identify potential improvements for the overall system. Firstly, exploring the delivery methods refers to how health care is provided and organized. This entails examining the accessibility, quality, and patient satisfaction with different modes of medical services, including primary care, specialized treatments, and emergency services. Secondly, investigating the financial aspect of the health care system involves analyzing the funding mechanisms, insurance coverage options, and affordability for both individuals and the government. Evaluating the management practices entails reviewing the coordination, integration, and efficiency of health care institutions, as well as the role of technology in improving patient care (Zurynski et al., 2022).  Assessing the sustainability methods of the U.S. health care system helps determine its capacity to adapt to future challenges, ensure long-term affordability, and prioritize preventive measures to promote population health(Molero et al., 2021).  By carefully scrutinizing these areas, it is possible to gain insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the U.S. health care system, ultimately aiding in the evaluation of its overall effectiveness. The desired tone for this paragraph is informative and objective, maintaining a neutral standpoint while presenting the importance of research on the delivery, finance, management, and sustainability methods of the U.S. health care system. It aims to present a comprehensive view, highlighting the significance of each area and emphasizing the need for evaluation.

 

Molero, A., Calabrò, M., Vignes, M., Gouget, B., & Gruson, D. (2021). Sustainability in Healthcare: Perspectives and reflections regarding laboratory medicine. Annals of Laboratory Medicine41(2), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2021.41.2.139

Zurynski, Y., Herkes-Deane, J., Holt, J., McPherson, E., Lamprell, G., Dammery, G., Meulenbroeks, I., Halim, N., & Braithwaite, J. (2022). How can the healthcare system deliver sustainable performance? A scoping review. BMJ Open12(5), e059207. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059207

Description:

The benchmark assesses the following competencies:

1.4 Participate in health care policy development to influence nursing practice and health care.

Research public health issues on the “Climate Change” or “Topics and Issues” pages of the American Public Health Association (APHA) website. Investigate a public health issue related to an environmental issue within the U.S. health care delivery system and examine its effect on a specific population.

Write a 750-1,000-word policy brief that summarizes the issue, explains the effect on the population, and proposes a solution to the issue.

Follow this outline when writing the policy brief:

1. Describe the policy health issue. Include the following information: (a) what population is affected, (b) at what level does it occur (local, state, or national), and (c) evidence about the issues supported by resources.
2. Create a problem statement.
3. Provide suggestions for addressing the health issue caused by the current policy. Describe what steps are required to initiate policy change. Include necessary stakeholders (government officials, administrator) and budget or funding considerations, if applicable.
4. Discuss the impact on the health care delivery system.

NRS 428 Discuss the Effectiveness of the U.S. Health Care System
NRS 428 Discuss the Effectiveness of the U.S. Health Care System

Include three peer-reviewed sources and two other sources to support the policy brief.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to theLopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 428 Discuss the Effectiveness of the U.S. Health Care System

Description

Objectives:

1. Apply screening and referral principles to nursing care of populations.
2. Examine the role of public health in addressing environmental issues.
3. Evaluate the effectiveness of the U.S. health care system.
4. Examine how policy in the U.S. health care delivery system affects specific populations.
5. Examine the effects of health care reform on the U.S. health care system and its stakeholders.

About the Affordable Care Act

Description:

Study “About the Affordable Care Act,” from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services website.

Health Care Transformation: The Affordable Care Act and More

Description:

Read “Health Care Transformation: The Affordable Care Act and More” (2014), located on the American Nurse Association website.

EPHO1: Surveillance of Population Health and Wellbeing

Description:

Read “EPHO1: Surveillance of Population Health and Wellbeing,” by the World Health Organization (WHO), located on the WHO website.

Policy Briefs

Description:

Read “Policy Briefs,” located on the World Health Organization (WHO) website.

2020 County Health Rankings: State Reports

Description:

Explore the 2020 County Health Rankings: State Reports website. This resource may be used for the Community Assessment and Community Teaching Plan assignments in Topics 4 and 5.

Climate Change

Description:

Explore the Climate Change page of the American Public Health Association (APHA) website.

Topics and Issues

Description:

Explore the Topics and Issues page of the American Public Health Association (APHA) website.

Functional Health Patterns Community Assessment Guide

Description:

Use the “Functional Health Patterns Community Assessment Guide” resource to complete the Community Assessment and Analysis Presentation.

Provider Interview Acknowledgement Form

Description:

Use the “Provider Interview Acknowledgement Form,” as directed in the Community Assessment and Analysis Presentation.

NRS 428 Discuss the Effectiveness of the U.S. Health Care System Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.