Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NRS 428 Discuss a global implication of the disease

Assessment Description
Write a paper (2,000-2,500 words) in which you apply the concepts of epidemiology
and nursing research to a communicable disease. Refer to "Communicable Disease
Chain," "Chain of Infection," and the CDC website for assistance when completing this
assignment.
Communicable Disease Selection
1. Chickenpox
2. Tuberculosis
3. Influenza
4. Mononucleosis
5. Hepatitis B
6. HIV
7. Ebola
8. Measles
9. Polio
10. Influenza
Epidemiology Paper Requirements
1. Describe the chosen communicable disease, including causes, symptoms,
mode of transmission, complications, treatment, and the demographic of
interest (mortality, morbidity, incidence, and prevalence). Is this a
reportable disease? If so, provide details about reporting time, whom to
report to, etc.
2. Describe the social determinants of health and explain how those factors
contribute to the development of this disease.
3. Discuss the epidemiologic triangle as it relates to the communicable disease
you have selected. Include the host factors, agent factors (presence or
absence), and environmental factors. Are there any special considerations
or notifications for the community, schools, or general population?
4. Explain the role of the community health nurse (case finding, reporting,
data collection, data analysis, and follow-up) and why demographic data are
necessary to the health of the community.
5. Identify at least one national agency or organization that addresses the
communicable disease chosen and describe how the organizations
contribute to resolving or reducing the impact of disease.

6. Discuss a global implication of the disease. How is this addressed in other
countries or cultures? Is this disease endemic to a particular area? Provide
an example.
A minimum of three peer-reviewed or professional references is required.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide,
located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the
assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite
technical support articles is located in Course Resources if you need assistance.
Attachments
NRS-428VN-RS2-CommunicableDiseaseChai

Rubric Criteria
Total125 points
Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Less Than

Satisfactory 3. Satisfactory 4. Good 5. Excellent

Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling,
capitalization, punctuation,
grammar, language use,
sentence structure, etc.

0 points
Errors in grammar or
syntax are pervasive
and impede meaning.
Incorrect language
choice or sentence
structure errors are
found throughout.

2 points
Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors are
present. Inconsistencies
in language choice or
sentence structure are
recurrent.

2.2 points
Occasional mechanical
errors are present.
Language choice is
generally appropriate.
Varied sentence
structure is attempted.

2.3 points
Few mechanical errors
are present. Suitable
language choice and
sentence structure are
used.

2.5 points
No mechanical errors are
present. Appropriate
language choice and
sentence structure are used
throughout.

National Agency or
Organization That Works to
Addresses Communicable
Disease
National Agency or
Organization That Works to
Addresses Communicable

0 points
Agency and
description of
contribution are
omitted.

10 points
An agency or
organization is
identified, but discussion
is vague or inaccurate in
relation to the
communicable disease

11 points
An agency or
organization is
identified, but
discussion regarding
efforts to address
communicable disease

11.5 points
An agency or
organization is
identified, but
discussion regarding
efforts to address
communicable disease

12.5 points
An agency or organization
is identified. A clear and
accurate description of
efforts to address
communicable disease is
offered.

Disease chosen. is lacking. is brief.
Epidemiologic Triangle
(Host Factors, Agent
Factors, and Environmental
Factors
Epidemiologic Triangle (Host
Factors, Agent Factors, and
Environmental Factors

0 points
Description of the
epidemiologic triangle
is omitted or
presented with many
inaccuracies.

20 points
The communicable
disease is described
with some inaccuracies
within the epidemiologic
triangle. A visual
description of the factors
and interaction is not
present.

22 points
The communicable
disease is described
accurately and clearly
within the context of
the epidemiologic
triangle.

23 points
The communicable
disease is described
accurately within the
context of the
epidemiologic triangle.
A brief description of
factors and interaction
is presented.

25 points
The communicable disease
is described thoroughly,
accurately, and clearly
within an epidemiological
triangle. A visual description
of the triangle and how the
components of the model
interact is included.

Determinants of Health and
Explanation of How
Determinants Contribute to
Disease Development
Determinants of Health and
Explanation of How
Determinants Contribute to
Disease Development

0 points
Description of the
determinants of health
and their role in
disease development
is omitted or
presented with many
inaccuracies.

10 points
Paper partially describes
the determinants of
health in relation to
disease development.

11 points
Paper identifies the
determinants of health
in relation to the
communicable disease
selected but does not
include an explanation
of their role in the
development of
disease.

11.5 points
Paper describes each
determinant of health
with a comprehensive
discussion of their
contribution to disease
development and
progression.

12.5 points
Paper comprehensively
discusses the determinants
of health in relation to the
communicable disease,
explains their contribution to
disease development, and
provides evidence to
support main points.

Evidence
Selects and integrates
evidence to support and
advance position/purpose;
considers other perspectives.

0 points
Evidence to support
the thesis, position, or
purpose is absent.
The writing relies
entirely on the
perspective of the
writer.

5 points
Evidence is limited or
irrelevant. The
interpretation of other
perspectives is
superficial or incorrect.

5.5 points
Evidence is used but is
insufficient or of limited
relevance. Simplistic
explanation or
integration of other
perspectives is
present.

5.75 points
Relevant evidence that
includes other
perspectives is used.

6.25 points
Specific and appropriate
evidence is included.
Relevant perspectives of
others are clearly
considered.

Comprehensive Description
of a Communicable Disease
and the Demographic of
Interest
Comprehensive Description
of a Communicable Disease
and the Demographic of

0 points
Demographic of
interest and clinical
description are omitted
or presented with
many inaccuracies.

10 points
Limited and/or vague
summary of
demographic of interest
and communicable
disease is provided.
Overview does not offer

11 points
Overview of the
demographic of
interest and clinical
description of the
communicable disease
is presented with some

11.5 points
Clinical description of
the communicable
disease and
demographic of
interest is provided.
Summary is brief but

12.5 points
Overview describing the
demographic of interest and
clinical description of the
communicable disease is
presented with a thorough,
accurate, and clear

Interest a clear representation of
information necessary
for epidemiological
study.

inaccuracies of the
clinical descriptors.

accurate. overview of all of the clinical

descriptors.

Thesis, Position, or
Purpose
Communicates reason for
writing and demonstrates
awareness of audience.

0 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is not
discernible. No
awareness of the
appropriate audience
is evident.

5 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is unfocused or
confused. There is very
little awareness of the
intended audience.

5.5 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is discernable
in most aspects but is
occasionally weak or
unclear. There is
limited awareness of
the appropriate
audience.

5.75 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is adequately
presented. An
awareness of the
appropriate audience
is demonstrated.

6.25 points
The thesis, position, or
purpose is clearly
communicated throughout
and clearly directed to a
specific audience.

Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style, such
as APA, MLA, etc., for
college, subject, and level;
documents sources using
citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc.,
appropriate to assignment
and discipline.

0 points
Appropriate format is
not used. No
documentation of
sources is provided.

3 points
Appropriate format is
attempted, but some
elements are missing.
Frequent errors in
documentation of
sources are evident.

3.3 points
Appropriate format and
documentation are
used, although there
are some obvious
errors.

3.45 points
Appropriate format and
documentation are
used with only minor
errors.

3.75 points
No errors in formatting or
documentation are present.

Role of the Community
Health Nurse and
Importance of Demographic
Data
Role of the Community
Health Nurse and Importance
of Demographic Data

0 points
Discussion of the role
of the community
health nurse is omitted
or unclear. An
explanation of why
demographic data are
necessary to
community health is
omitted or unclear.

20 points
Discussion of the role of
the community health
nurse is vague, with no
integration of case
finding, reporting, data
collecting, data analysis,
or follow-up skills. An
incomplete explanation
of why demographic
data are necessary to
community health is
provided.

22 points
Discussion of the role
of the community
health nurses is
limited, with a brief
overview of skills
associated with
community
assessment and
planning. An
explanation of why
demographic data are
necessary to

23 points
Discussion of the role
of community health
nurse is clear, with a
comprehensive
description of skills
associated with
community
assessment and
planning. An
explanation of why
demographic data are
necessary to

25 points
Discussion of the role of the
community health nurse is
clear, comprehensive, and
inclusive of the community
nurse's responsibilities to
primary, secondary, and
tertiary prevention through
tasks such as case finding,
reporting, data collection
and analysis, and follow-up.
A clear explanation of the
importance of demographic

community health is
summarized.

community health is
presented.

data to community health is
presented.

Global Implication
Global Implication

0 points
Global implication of
the disease is omitted
or unclear.

10 points
A discussion of the
global implication of the
disease is vague, with
no integration of how
this is addressed in
other countries or
cultures and if the
disease is endemic to a
particular area. An
example is not provided.

11 points
A discussion of the
global implication of
the disease is limited,
with some integration
of how this is
addressed in other
countries or cultures
and if the disease is
endemic to a particular
area. An example is
provided.

11.5 points
A discussion of the
global implication of
the disease is clear,
with a comprehensive
description of how this
is addressed in other
countries or cultures
and if the disease is
endemic to a particular
area. An example is
provided.

12.5 points
A discussion of the global
implication of the disease is
clear, comprehensive, and
inclusive with a
comprehensive description
of how this is addressed in
other countries or cultures
and if the disease is
endemic to a particular
area. An example is
provided.

Development, Structure,
and Conclusion
Advances position or purpose
throughout writing; conclusion
aligns to and evolves from
development.

0 points
No advancement of
the thesis, position, or
purpose is evident.
Connections between
paragraphs are
missing or
inappropriate. No
conclusion is offered.

5 points
Writing lacks logical
progression of the
thesis, position, or
purpose. Some
organization is
attempted, but ideas are
disconnected.
Conclusion is unclear
and not supported by
the overall development
of the purpose.

5.5 points
Limited advancement
of thesis, position, or
purpose is discernable.
There are
inconsistencies in
organization or the
relationship of ideas.
Conclusion is simplistic
and not fully aligned to
the development of the
purpose.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.