Boost your Grades with us today!
NRS 427 Week 5 Assignment Community Presentation
Sample Answer for NRS 427 Week 5 Assignment Community Presentation Included After Question
Details:
Note: This is an individual assignment. Based on the feedback offered by the provider, identify the best approach for teaching. Prepare a presentation to accompany the teaching plan and present the information to your community. Select one of the following options for delivery of the presentation:
- PowerPoint presentation – no more than 30 minutes
- Pamphlet presentation – 1 to 2 pages
- Poster presentation
Appropriate community settings include:
- Public health clinic
- Community health center
- Long-term care facility
- Transitional care facility
- Home health center
- University/School health center
- Church community
- Adult/Child care center
Before presenting information to the community, seek approval from an agency administrator or representative.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 427 Week 5 Assignment Community Presentation
Upon receiving approval from the agency, include the “Community Teaching Experience Form” as part of your assignment submission.
APA format is required for essays only. Solid academic writing is always expected. For all assignment delivery options, documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.
When submitting this assignment, include the interview questions, the interview findings, completed “Provider Interview Acknowledgement Form,” and the community assessment PPT presentation.
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NRS 427 Week 5 Assignment Community Presentation
Title: NRS 427 Week 5 Assignment Community Presentation
Introduction
Community assessment is an important practice in nursing and healthcare. Nurses and other healthcare providers conduct community assessment and analysis to determine the actual needs, health status, and issues that community members face. Community assessment also aligns the adopted strategies in healthcare with the community needs. The results of community assessment guides the development of strategies to address the prioritized community needs. For example, nurses develop plans that address barriers to access to care in cases where community assessment shows the community members to experience extensive barriers in accessing the care that they need. Therefore, this presentation focuses on a community assessment and analysis performed on Leander Community, Texas. It identifies the socio-economic structure, barriers, challenges, and social determinants of health that community members experience in accessing the care that they need.
Community Description
The selected community for assessment is Leander City. Leander City is located in Texas State , Travis County. The city is ranked 51st largest city in Texas state and 427th largest city in the United States of America. The estimate land mass of the city is 37.7 square miles and a population density of 2205.50 per square mile (Census.gov, 2022).
The majority of the population in Leander City comprise the whites with a percentage of 83.28%. Individuals of Hispanic or Latino background follows with 24.2%, African Americans (8.0%), and two or more races (6.4%). The population of Leander City as per Census of 2020 was 59202. The population represented a significant increase when compared to 26521 of 2010. The majority of the population comprises of females (51.3%). People aged under 5 years is 8.0%, 29.6% for those under 18 years and 8.5% for those aged above 65 years. There is a high rate of home ownership in the state. The estimated population of home ownership is 78.2% (Census.gov, 2022).
Financial Description
The financial analysis of Leander City shows that it has a high rate of employment. Accordingly, 73.2% of the population is civilian labor force with the percentage of women in civilian labor force being 65.8%. The total spending in the city is also high as evidenced by the fact that total retail sales in 2012 was $2469410000. The estimated household income of the city as per 2020 was $106108. The per capital income for the last one year in 2020 was $40373. The poverty rate in Leander city is low as evidenced by the fact that 4.3% of the population lives in poverty. The city also had 2603 business firms in 2012 with men-owned firms being 1226 while women-owned firms were 1080. The minority-owned firms were 660, 1836 for non-minority, 195 for veterans, and 2322 for non-veterans (Census.gov, 2022).
Education Description
The majority of the population in Leander City is educated. Accordingly, the statistics by US Census for 2020 shows that 92.8% of the population aged 25 years and above were high school graduates or higher in 2020. The statistics also shows that 41.0% of the population aged 25 years and above had bachelor’s degree and above in 2020. Leander City has excellent educational system and schools. The majority of the schools are district schools. The educational resources are adequate in the city. This can be seen from the statistics that the average student-teacher ratio for all the schools in the city is 1:13.83.
Ethnic and Phenomenological Features
As noted initially, the majority of the population in Leander City comprises the Whites (77.0%). The proportion of other ethnicities is varied. For example, Black comprise 8.0%, American Indian 0.0%, Asian alone 4.7%, Native Hawaiian 0.1%, two or more races 6.4%, Hispanic 24.2%, and White alone, not Latino or Hispanic 59.1%. The citizenry of the city shows that 94.9% of the population are US citizens. This rate is higher than 93.4% of the national average. The population analysis shows that the leading population’s background are Mexico, India, and El Salvador. Therefore, the leading ethnicity of foreign born individuals in the city have Mexican origin followed by India and El Salvador (data.usa.io, n.d).
Social Interactions
People in Leander City exhibit different types of social interactions. The first one is exchange interaction. Exchange interaction is a type of social interaction that stabilizes the social structure. The community members interact with the aim of gaining from their actions. They anticipate either tangible or intangible rewards from their interaction. Reciprocity guides their actions. Competition is a type of social interaction that contributes to social change. The community members oppose each other with the aim of achieving a specific goal. It forms the basis of social classes witness in Leander City. The other type of social interaction seen in the community is conflict interaction. Conflict interaction seeks to control others by force. Conflict interaction is evident through the mechanisms that the government implement stricter policies for the public health. An example can be seen in those implemented during the Covid19 pandemic. The last type of social interaction evident in the community is cooperation. Cooperation is a type of social interaction where community members work together with the aim of achieving a common goal.
Barriers and Challenges
The community assessment identified a number of barriers and challenges that people in Leander City experience in accessing the care that they need. One of them is limited appointment hours. Most hospitals in the region require that patients book appointments for their visits for physician assessment. However, the population faces the challenge of limited appointment slots and hours from their service providers. The limited appointment slots and hours is attributed to the shortage of physicians in the region. As a result, they incur significant costs travelling to other hospitals in the region to access the care that they need. The other barrier identified from the community assessment is financial barriers. Some of the community members cannot afford the high cost of healthcare services in the region. The high cost makes it hard for them to access the care they need. Factors such as low insurance coverage and unaffordability of premium insurance has made it hard for the majority of the population to access the care they need. The last barrier is lack of awareness. The assessment showed low level of awareness among the population on the available care services they can access in the region. As a result, healthcare utilization rate is low (Cromer et al., 2019).
Social Determinants of Health
The community assessment revealed several social determinants of health in Leander City. One of them is educational status. Educational status affect awareness about health needs and practices and utilization of healthcare services. Highly educated persons in the community were found to live healthier lives compared to those with low educational levels (Gottlieb et al., 2019). The other factor is employment status. Employment influences affordability and access to healthcare. The employed often afford their needed care due to them having medical insurance coverage that expand their access to healthcare. Income is another social determinant of health in the community. High income in the community translates into access to high quality care in the community. Individuals from low socioeconomic backgrounds were found to experience challenges in accessing their needed care due to cost barriers (Cromer et al., 2019). The other social determinant identified in the community is health insurance coverage. People with health insurance coverage accessed the care they needed with ease due to the elimination of cost barriers in healthcare.
The other social determinant identified from the community assessment is healthcare cost. The cost of healthcare in the USA is ranked among the highest in the globe’s developed countries. High cost of healthcare is barrier to most of the community members who are of low to middle socioeconomic status. The other social determinant of health identified from the community assessment is social support. Social support is important for mental health and wellbeing of the community members. The people of Leander City have adequate access to social support services for their health. As a result, it promotes their health and wellbeing. Neighborhood is another social determinant of health identified from the community assessment. Leander City is a moderately safe community. As a result, the population enjoys safe and secure environment that promotes their health (Gottlieb et al., 2019). The last social determinant of health identified from the assessment is health practices. The adoption of health practices such as healthy dietary routines and physical activity minimize the risk of health problems such as obesity and diabetes. Leander has moderate adoption of healthy practices, hence, health of the population.
Summary of Community Assessment
The community assessment identified the existence of different partnerships in the community. The partnerships exist between community members, religious institutions, government, and non-governmental institutions. The institutions work with the community members to address prioritized issues affecting them. For example, the government supports community initiatives that aim at improving the health and wellbeing of the community. Religious institutions work with the community members to strengthen the existing social support systems. Different funding sources were also identified from they community assessment. They include out-of-pocket payment for healthcare services, government support and community sponsored programs that enhance access to healthcare.
Summary of the Interview
The interview for the community analysis was done with a public health official of Leander City. The official has extensive experience with addressing the public health issues facing the people of Leander City. The interview examined several issues. One of them was the analysis of the overall health of the community. The interviewee provided insights into the overall health, health practices, values, and beliefs of Leander people. He also explored the issues that affect access to healthcare in the community. The interview also explored the crucial community health needs that should be addressed for the optimum health and wellbeing of the people of Leander. We explored the stakeholders that should be involved in addressing the identified healthcare issues in the community.
The interview with the public health official showed that the community is moderately healthy. The community members practice positive health behaviors such as the utilization of screening services and early treatment for health problems. The official also noted that the community has a moderate access to healthcare. The moderate access could be seen from the high utilization of the healthcare services by the population. The interview identified some barriers to healthcare in the region. They included cost, provider shortage, and low awareness among the population about the existing health promotion services they can utilize to achieve their health needs. The official was keen to note that a focus should be on addressing the social determinants of health in the region. The focus will reduce significantly the challenges that the community members experience in achieving their health needs (Shukla et al., 2020).
Identified Issue
Impact of the Issue
The interview showed that the low utilization of screening services in the community had affected significantly the population’s health. One of the identified effects is the delays in disease diagnosis and treatment. The official noted that most of the patients with chronic illnesses in the region are diagnosed when the disease has progressed due to limited utilization screening services. Delayed diagnosis and treatment contributes to poor prognosis in chronic conditions such as cancer and heart disease. The official also noted that the rate of lifestyle diseases has been rising significantly due to the low utilization of screening services. The majority of the population is predisposed to lifestyle diseases such as obesity, hypertension, and diabetes. There is also an increase in the disease burden in the community. This can be seen from high costs incurred in seeking healthcare by the affected populations (Al Shamsi et al., 2020). There is also increased disparities in health among the population since low utilization of screening services increases the risk of health problems.
References
Al Shamsi, H., Almutairi, A. G., Al Mashrafi, S., & Al Kalbani, T. (2020). Implications of Language Barriers for Healthcare: A Systematic Review. Oman Medical Journal, 35(2), e122. https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2020.40
Census.gov. (2022). U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts: Leander city, Texas. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/leandercitytexas
Cromer, K. J., Wofford, L., & Wyant, D. K. (2019). Barriers to Healthcare Access Facing American Indian and Alaska Natives in Rural America. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 36(4), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370016.2019.1665320
data.usa.io. (n.d.). Leander, TX | Data USA. Retrieved April 20, 2022, from https://datausa.io/profile/geo/leander-tx
Gottlieb, L., Fichtenberg, C., Alderwick, H., & Adler, N. (2019). Social Determinants of Health: What’s a Healthcare System to Do? Journal of Healthcare Management, 64(4), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-18-00160
Shukla, N., Pradhan, B., Dikshit, A., Chakraborty, S., & Alamri, A. M. (2020). A Review of Models Used for Investigating Barriers to Healthcare Access in Australia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), 4087. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17114087
Lopes Write Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Important information for writing discussion questions and participation
Welcome to class
Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to
I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.
Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.
If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.
Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.
Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.
I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!
Hi Class,
Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.
Contact me if you have any questions.
Important information on Writing a Discussion Question
- Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
- There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
- Include in-text citations in your response
- Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
- Follow APA-7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor
- A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
- Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
- Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
- Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
- Follow APA 7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
- Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
- Here are some helpful links
- Student paper example
- Citing Sources
- The Writing Center is a great resource