Sample Answer for NRS 415 Personal Reflection Included After Question
Assessment Description
The purpose of this assignment is to reflect on your collaborative practice within the CLC Health Organization Evaluation assignment.
In 250-500 words, answer the following:
- Describe the communication tools and techniques used by your team. What were the strengths and weaknesses of the group when collaborating to complete this project?
- What strategy, or approach, would improve your collaborative practice in future projects?
- When working in a health care setting, how would interprofessional collaboration work to support quality and the improvement of patient outcomes?
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assigning to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education
This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 6.1, 6.2.
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NRS 415 Personal Reflection
Title: NRS 415 Personal Reflection
A collaborative learning community (CLC) provides students with opportunities to enhance their understanding of research topics, including the evaluation of healthcare organizations based on a developed strategic plan as a means of readiness for change (Alberti et al., 2021). As such, the CLC assignment on the evaluation of Providence Health involved using different techniques. The group used different tools and techniques that included the GCU system CLC group communication wall, email, and WhatApp. The communication tools and techniques enabled the group to effectively coordinate and collaborate to complete the evaluation assignment. The core strengths of the group when collaborating included effective communication and coordination, inclusion, and involvement of all members. For instance, each member of the group worked on a different area of the assignment and shared their findings to enrich the CLC presentation. However, the core weakness of the group in collaborating to complete the project was time management. Some members required more time to complete their part of the assignment.
The strategy or approach that can improve the collaborative practice in future projects is effective time management. Time management will enable the members to complete future projects and share their findings before presenting them to larger audiences (Dang et al., 2021). Effective time management will improve coordination and solve any future challenges that may arise during the collaboration.
Inter-professional collaboration is essential in supporting quality and improvement of patient outcomes in health care settings. Inter-professional collaboration leads to improved coordination and development of a common care plan that allows providers to enhance quality care leading to better patient outcomes. Inter-professional collaboration supports quality and improvement of patient outcomes by suggesting and implementing evidence-based practice approaches (Rawlinson et al., 2021). Again, it supports quality through research activities that lead to better interventions and continuous quality improvement (CQI) initiatives.
References
Alberti, S., Motta, P., Ferri, P., & Bonetti, L. (2021). The effectiveness of team-based learning in
nursing education: a systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 97, 104721.
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104721.
Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2021). Johns Hopkins
evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and guidelines. Sigma Theta Tau.
Rawlinson, C., Carron, T., Cohidon, C., Arditi, C., Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., & Gilles, I. (2021).
An overview of reviews on inter-professional collaboration in primary care: Barriers and facilitators. International Journal of Integrated Care, 21(2). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.5589