NRS 410 Discussion: Functional Patterns in Health of a Patient

NRS 410 Discussion: Functional Patterns in Health of a Patient

NRS 410 Discussion: Functional Patterns in Health of a Patient

 

Description:

Discuss how functional patterns help a nurse understand the current and past state of health for a patient. Using a condition or disease associated with an elimination complexity, provide an example.

Description:

It is necessary for an RN-BSN-prepared nurse to demonstrate an enhanced understanding of the pathophysiological processes of disease, the clinical manifestations and treatment protocols, and how they affect clients across the life span.

Evaluate the Health History and Medical Information for Mr. C., presented below.

Based on this information, formulate a conclusion based on your evaluation, and complete the Critical Thinking Essay assignment, as instructed below.

Health History

 Mr. C., a 32-year-old single male, is seeking information at the outpatient center regarding possible bariatric surgery for his obesity. He currently works at a catalog telephone center. He reports that he has always been heavy, even as a small child, gaining approximately 100 pounds in the last 2-3 years. Previous medical evaluations have not indicated any metabolic diseases, but he says he has sleep apnea and high blood pressure, which he tries to control by restricting dietary sodium. Mr. C. reports increasing shortness of breath with activity, swollen ankles, and pruritus over the last 6 months.

Objective Data:

 

1. Height: 68 inches; weight 5 kg 2. BP: 172/98, HR 88, RR 26

3. 3+ pitting edema bilateral feet and ankles
4. Fasting blood glucose: 146 mg/dL
5. Total cholesterol: 250 mg/dL
6. Triglycerides: 312 mg/dL
7. HDL: 30 mg/dL
8. Serum creatinine 1.8 mg/dL
9. BUN 32 mg/dl

 

Critical Thinking Essay

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 410 Discussion: Functional Patterns in Health of a Patient

In 750-1,000 words, critically evaluate Mr. C.’s potential diagnosis and intervention(s). Include the following:

 

1. Describe the clinical manifestations present in Mr.
2. Describe the potential health risks for obesity that are of concern for C. Discuss whether bariatric surgery is an appropriate intervention.
3. Assess each of C.’s functional health patterns using the information given. Discuss at least five actual or potential problems can you identify from the functional health patterns and provide the rationale for each. (Functional health patterns include health-perception,

health-management, nutritional, metabolic, elimination, activity-exercise, sleep-rest, cognitive-perceptual, self-perception/self-concept, role-relationship, sexuality/reproductive, coping-stress tolerance.)

4. Explain the staging of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and contributing factors to
5. Consider ESRD prevention and health promotion Describe what type of patient education should be provided to Mr. C. for prevention of future events, health restoration, and avoidance of deterioration of renal status.
6. Explain the type of resources available for ESRD patients for nonacute care and the type of multidisciplinary approach that would be beneficial for these Consider aspects such as devices, transportation, living conditions, return-to-employment issues.

 

You are required to cite to a minimum of two sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice.

 

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

 

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

 

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

 

Description

Objectives:

1. Evaluate functions of systems related to elimination.
2. Examine the nurse’s role of supporting the patient’s psychological and emotional needs.
3. Recommend resources to assist in patient recovery.

Pathophysiology: Clinical Applications for Client Health

Description:

Read Chapter 3 in Pathophysiology: Clinical Applications for Client Health.

Pathophysiological, Molecular and Therapeutic Issues of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: An Overview

Description:

“Pathophysiological, Molecular and Therapeutic Issues of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: An Overview,” by Marchisello et. al., from International Journal of Molecular Sciences2019.

Nephrotoxicity of Iodinated Contrast Media: From Pathophysiology to Prevention Strategies

Description:

Read” Nephrotoxicity of Iodinated Contrast Media: From Pathophysiology to Prevention Strategies,” by Faucon, Bobrie, and Clement, from European Journal of Radiology (2019).

Acute Pancreatitis: A Comparative Study to Assess the Clinical Outcome of Acute Pancreatitis in Relation With Major Etiologies

Description:

Read “Acute Pancreatitis: A Comparative Study to Assess the Clinical Outcome of Acute Pancreatitis in Relation With Major Etiologies,” by Abibasi and Abid, from Professional Medical Journal (2019).

Management of Hypertriglyceridemia Induced Acute Pancreatitis

Description:

Read “Management of Hypertriglyceridemia Induced Acute Pancreatitis,” by Garg and Rustagi, from BioMed Research International (2018).

Variceal Bleeding in Alcoholic Liver Cirrhosis – A Short Review

Description:

Read “Variceal Bleeding in Alcoholic Liver Cirrhosis – A Short Review,” by Sanjeevi, Rizwan, and Subhashini, from
Drug Intervention Today (2019).

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Decline and Risk of End-Stage Renal Disease in Type 2 Diabetes

Description:

Read “Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Decline and Risk of End-Stage Renal Disease in Type 2 Diabetes,” by Megumi et al., from PLOS ONE (2018).

Diagnostic Dilemmas in a Girl with Acute Glomerulonephritis: Answers

Description:

Read “Diagnostic Dilemmas in a Girl with Acute Glomerulonephritis: Answers,” by Falix et al., from Pediatric Nephrology (2018).

Screening and Management of Hepatitis C: Use Education to Dispel the Myths About the Disease and Increase Screening and Treatment

Description:

Read “Screening and Management of Hepatitis C: Use Education to Dispel the Myths About the Disease and Increase Screening and Treatment,” by Pilger and Costanzo, from American Nurse Today (2018).

A Clinical Review of Autoimmune Hepatitis

Description:

Read “A Clinical Review of Autoimmune Hepatitis,” by Pullen, from MEDSURG Nursing (2019).

Changes in Glomerular Filtration Rate and Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Description:

Read “Changes in Glomerular Filtration Rate and Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation,” by Frauchier et al., from American Heart Journal (2018).

Facts About Chronic Kidney Disease

Description:

Read “Facts About Chronic Kidney Disease,” from the A to Z Health Guide (2017), located on the National Kidney Foundation website.

Acute Kidney Failure

Description:

Read “Acute Kidney Failure,” located on the Mayo Clinic website.

Kidney Failure (Symptoms, Signs, Stages, Causes, Treatment, and Life Expectancy)

Description:

Read “Kidney Failure (Symptoms, Signs, Stages, Causes, Treatment, and Life Expectancy),” by Wedro, located on the MedicineNet website.

Ascites: A Common Problem in People With Cirrhosis

Description:

Read “Ascites: A Common Problem in People With Cirrhosis,” by Chalasani (2013), located on the American College of Gastroenterology website.

NRS 410 Discussion: Functional Patterns in Health of a Patient Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable	No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions. Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Application of Course Knowledge – Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources; Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources. Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content	Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson. Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson	Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post. Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life	Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category	5	4	3	2	0
Interactive Dialogue Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days. (5 points possible per graded thread)	Exceeds minimum post requirements Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days. Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days Replies to a question posed by a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days. The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty	Has only one post for the week Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments	Does not post to the thread No connections are made to the topic
	Minus 1 Point	Minus 2 Point	Minus 3 Point	Minus 4 Point	Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted. Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition	2-3 errors in APA format. Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors. Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.	4-5 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is somewhat focused.	6-7 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.	8-10 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.	Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format. Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style does not facilitate communication. The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
	0 points lost				-5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements per discussion thread	The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.				The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement per discussion thread	The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.				The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.