Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NRNP 6650 Week 6 Assignment: Applying Current Literature to Clinical Practice

NRNP 6650 Week 6 Assignment: Applying Current Literature to Clinical Practice

Psychiatric mental health nursing practice is one of the newest disciplines to be licensed to
provide psychotherapy As such, the majority of psychotherapy research is centered on
other disciplines such as psychology, social work, marriage/family therapy, art therapy,
psychiatry, and mental health counseling. This makes it essential for you to be able to
translate current literature from other disciplines into your own clinical practice. For this
Assignment, you practice this skill by examining literature on group work and group
therapy and considering its applicability to your own clients.
Learning Objectives

Students will:
 Evaluate the application of current literature to clinical practice
To prepare:
 Review this week’s Learning Resources and reflect on the insights they provide on
group work and group therapy.
 Select one of the articles from the Learning Resources to evaluate for this
Assignment.
Note: In nursing practice, it is not uncommon to review current literature and share findings
with your colleagues. Approach this Assignment as though you were presenting the
information to your colleagues.
The Assignment
In a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation, address the following:
 Provide an overview of the article you selected, including answers to the following
questions:
o What type of group was discussed?
o Who were the participants in the group? Why were they selected?
o What was the setting of the group?
o How often did the group meet?
o What was the duration of the group therapy?
o What curative factors might be important for this group and why?
o What “exclusion criteria” did the authors mention?
 Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article. Include whether this will
translate into practice with your own client groups. If so, how? If not, why?
 Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the
findings/outcomes presented in the article.
Note: The presentation should be 5–10 slides, not including the title and reference slides.
Include presenter notes (no more than a half page per slide) and use tables and/or diagrams
where appropriate. Be sure to support your work with specific citations from the article you
selected. Support your presentation with evidence-based literature.
By Day 7
Submit your Assignment.
Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
 Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK6Assgn+last
name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
 Click the Week 6 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the
Assignment.
 Click the Week 6 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for
grading criteria from this area.
 Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the
document you saved as “WK6Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and
click Open.
 If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to
submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
 Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:
Week 6 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 6 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

To submit your Assignment:
Week 6 Assignment

Midterm Exam

In order to become a practicing psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner (PMHNP),
you are required to acquire and maintain active certification as a PMHNP. Currently, the
American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) is the only certification exam available to
PMHNPs. This midterm exam is designed to help you prepare for the ANCC certification
exam.
Note: As always, you are responsible for being aware or your own state’s licensing
requirements.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
 Assess knowledge of concepts and principles related to the psychotherapy of groups
and families
This exam will cover topics related to psychotherapy with groups and families, as follows:
 Introductory concepts related to group and family therapy
 Family assessment and phases of family therapy
 Experiential and narrative family therapy
 Structural and strategic family therapy
 Solution-focused and cognitive behavioral family therapy
By Day 7
Complete the midterm exam. Prior to starting the exam, you should review all of your
materials. There is a 2-hour time limit to complete this 76-question exam. You may only
attempt this exam once.
This exam is a test of your knowledge in preparation for your certification exam. No
outside resources including books, notes, websites, or any other type of resource are to be
used to complete this exam. You are expected to comply with Walden University’s Code of
Conduct.
Submission and Grading Information
Submit Your Quiz by Day 7

To submit your Quiz:
Week 6 Quiz

Making Connections
Now that you have:
 Explored group therapy and considered how you might apply current literature to
your own clinical practice

NRNP 6650 Week 6 Assignment Applying Current Literature to Clinical Practice

NRNP 6650 Week 6 Assignment Applying Current Literature to Clinical Practice

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NRNP 6650 Week 6 Assignment: Applying Current Literature to Clinical Practice

Next week, you will:
 Examine group processes, stages of formation, curative factors, and strategies for
managing intragroup conflict

Looking Ahead: Week 7 Video
Next week, you will need to view a video prior to completing your Discussions and
Assignments. This video is more than 3 hours in length. Please plan ahead to ensure you
have time to view this video and complete your Discussions and Assignments on time.

To go to the next week:
Week 7

Name:  Assignment Rubric

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Summarize your interpretation of the frequency data provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, and family income from prior month. 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, a summary of the frequency distributions for the variables presented.

The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, the number of times the value occurs in the data.

The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and an explanation of extreme values in describing intervals that sufficiently provides an analysis that fully supports the categorization of each variable value.

The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the areas described.

28 (28%) – 31 (31%)

The response accurately summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented.

The response accurately explains the number of times the value occurs in the data.

The response accurately explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and explains extreme values in describing intervals that provides an analysis which supports the categorization of each variable value.

The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the areas described.

25 (25%) – 27 (27%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented.

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the number of times the value occurs in the data.

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and inaccurately or vaguely explains extreme values.

An analysis that may support the categorization of each variable value is inaccurate or vague.

The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the areas described.

0 (0%) – 24 (24%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented, or it is missing.

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the number of times the value occurs in the data, or it is missing.

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and an explanation of extreme values, or it is missing.

An analysis that does not support the categorization of each variable values is provided, or it is missing.

The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the areas described, or it is missing.

Summarize your interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, race and ethnicity, currently employed, and family income from prior month. 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

The response accurately and clearly summarizes in detail the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided.

The response accurately and clearly evaluates in detail each of the variables presented, including an accurate and complete description of the sample size, the mean, the median, standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

The response accurately summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided.

The response accurately explains evaluates each of the variables presented, including an accurate description of the sample size, the mean, the median, standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided.

The response inaccurately or vaguely evaluates each of the variables presented, including an inaccurate or vague description of the sample size, the mean, the median, the standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided, or it is missing.

The response inaccurately and vaguely evaluates each of the variables presented, including an inaccurate and vague description of the sample size, the mean, the median, the standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data, or it is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Total Points: 100

Name:  Assignment Rubric

 

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.