Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NRNP 6640 Week 11 Discussion: Psychotherapy With Personality Disorders

NRNP 6640 Week 11 Discussion: Psychotherapy With Personality Disorders

Since personality represents who someone is at the deepest level, it is understandable that
many people with personality disorders resist the idea that they have a fundamental
dysfunction with their personality. Even when clients acknowledge that their personality
problems are at the heart of their interpersonal problems, they often find it difficult to
change. As the mental health professional, how do you overcome this challenge and
effectively counsel these clients?
This week, as you explore psychotherapy with personality disorders, you examine
therapeutic approaches to treating clients with personality and interpersonal problems.
Photo Credit: [Tempura]/[E+]/Getty Images

Learning Resources
Required Readings
American Nurses Association. (2014). Psychiatric-mental health nursing: Scope and
standards of practice (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
 Standard 5H “Psychotherapy” (pages 63-64)
Wheeler, K. (Ed.). (2014). Psychotherapy for the advanced practice psychiatric nurse: A how-
to guide for evidence-based practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing
Company.
 Chapter 20, “Termination and Outcome Evaluation” (Review pp. 693–712)

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental
disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Dixon-Gordon, K. L., Turner, B. J., & Chapman, A. L. (2011). Psychotherapy for
personality disorders. International Review Of Psychiatry, 23(3), 282-302.
doi:10.3109/09540261.2011.586992

Lorentzen, S., Ruud, T., Fjeldstad, A., & Høglend, P. A. (2015). Personality disorder
moderates outcome in short- and long-term group analytic psychotherapy: A randomized
clinical trial. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54(2), 129-146. doi:10.1111/bjc.12065

Paris, J. (2004). Personality disorders over time: implications for psychotherapy. American
Journal Of Psychotherapy, 58(4), 420-429.

Swift, J. K., & Greenberg, R. P. (2015). What is premature termination, and why does it
occur? In Premature termination in psychotherapy: Strategies for engaging clients and
improving outcomes (pp. 11–31). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
doi:10.1037/14469-002

Optional Resources

Dorr, D. (1999). Approaching psychotherapy of the personality disorders from the Millon
perspective. Journal of Personality Assessment, 72(3), 407–425. PMID: 10491846

Bach, B., Lee, C., Mortensen, E. L., & Simonsen, E. (2016). How do DSM-5 personality
traits align with schema therapy constructs? Journal of Personality Disorders, 30(4),
502–529. doi:10.1521/pedi_2015_29_212

Discussion: Therapy for Clients With Personality Disorders
Clients with personality disorders often find it difficult to overcome their problems and
function in daily life. Even when these clients are aware that they have a dysfunction with
their personality and are open to counseling, treatment can be challenging for both the
client and the therapist. For this Discussion, as you examine personality disorders, consider
therapeutic approaches you might use with clients.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
 Analyze therapeutic approaches to treating clients with personality disorders
To prepare:
 Review this week’s Learning Resources and reflect on the insights they provide.

NRNP 6640 Week 11 Discussion Psychotherapy With Personality Disorders

NRNP 6640 Week 11 Discussion Psychotherapy With Personality Disorders

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NRNP 6640 Week 11 Discussion: Psychotherapy With Personality Disorders

 Select one of the personality disorders from the DSM-5.
Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be
able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the "Post to
Discussion Question" link and then select "Create Thread" to complete your initial post.
Remember, once you click Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and cannot post
anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking Submit!
By Day 3
Post a description of the personality disorder you selected. Explain a therapeutic approach
(including psychotropic medications if appropriate) you might use to treat a client
presenting with this disorder, including how you would share your diagnosis of this
disorder to the client in order to avoid damaging the therapeutic relationship. Support
your approach with evidence-based literature.
Read a selection of your colleagues' responses.
By Day 6
Respond to at least two of your colleagues by providing one alternative therapeutic
approach. Explain why you suggest this alternative and support your suggestion with
evidence-based literature and/or your own experiences with clients.
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 11 Discussion Rubric
Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6

To participate in this Discussion:
Week 11 Discussion

Exam: Final Exam
Learning Objectives
Students will:
 Assess knowledge of concepts, principles, and theories related to the psychotherapy
of individuals

This exam is a test of your knowledge in preparation for your certification exam. No
outside resources including books, notes, websites, or any other type of resource are to be
used to complete this exam. You are expected to comply with Walden University’s Code of
Conduct.
This exam will cover the following topics from the Wheeler textbook, which relate to
psychotherapy of individuals:
 Supportive and Psychodynamic Psychotherapy
 Interpersonal Psychotherapy
 Humanistic-Existential and Solution-Focused Approaches to Psychotherapy
 Psychotherapy With Children
 Psychotherapy With Older Adults
 Termination and Outcome Evaluation
By Day 7
Complete the Final Exam. Prior to starting the exam, you should review all of your
materials. There is a 2-hour time limit to complete this 76-question exam. You may only
attempt this exam once.
Submission
Submit Your Exam by Day 7

To submit your Exam:
Week 11 Exam

Congratulations! After you have finished all of the assignments for this week, you have
completed the course. Please submit your Course Evaluation by Day 7.

Name:  Discussion Rubric

  Excellent

90–100

Good

80–89

Fair

70–79

Poor

0–69

Main Posting:

Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s).

Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three current credible sources.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to most of the Discussion question(s).

Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three credible references.

31 (31%) – 34 (34%)

Responds to some of the Discussion question(s).

One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Cited with fewer than two credible references.

0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

Does not respond to the Discussion question(s).

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Contains only one or no credible references.

Main Posting:

Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Written clearly and concisely.

Contains no grammatical or spelling errors.

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Written concisely.

May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors.

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Written somewhat concisely.

May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Not written clearly or concisely.

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Posting:

Timely and full participation

9 (9%) – 10 (10%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts main Discussion by due date.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts main Discussion by due date.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Posts main Discussion by due date.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post main Discussion by due date.

First Response:

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

First Response:

Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.

Response is written in standard, edited English.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.

Response to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

First Response:

Timely and full participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Posts by due date.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.

Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Second Response:
Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.

Response is written in standard, edited English.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.

Response to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response:
Timely and full participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Posts by due date.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.

Total Points: 100

Name:  Discussion Rubric

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.