NRNP 6635 WEEK 10 Assignment Assessing and Diagnosing Patients With Neurocognitive and Neurodevelopmental Disorders INSTRUCTIONS PLUS RUBRIC
Sample Answer for NRNP 6635 WEEK 10 Assignment Assessing and Diagnosing Patients With Neurocognitive and Neurodevelopmental Disorders INSTRUCTIONS PLUS RUBRIC Included After Question
Neurodevelopmental disorders begin in the developmental period of childhood and may continue through adulthood. They may range from the very specific to a general or global impairment, and often co-occur (APA, 2013). They include specific learning and language disorders, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorders, and intellectual disabilities. Neurocognitive disorders, on the other hand, represent a decline in one or more areas of prior mental function that is significant enough to impact independent functioning. They may occur at any time in life and be caused by factors such brain injury; diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, or Huntington’s; infection; or stroke, among others.
For this Assignment, you will assess a patient in a case study who presents with a neurocognitive or neurodevelopmental disorder.
To Prepare:
- Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide. Consider how neurocognitive impairments may have similar presentations to other psychological disorders.
- Review the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation template, which you will use to complete this Assignment.
- By Day 1 of this week, select a specific video case study to use for this Assignment from the Video Case Selections choices in the Learning Resources. View your assigned video case and review the additional data for the case in the “Case History Reports” document, keeping the requirements of the evaluation template in mind.
- Consider what history would be necessary to collect from this patient.
- Consider what interview questions you would need to ask this patient.
- Identify at least three possible differential diagnoses for the patient.
By Day 7 of Week 10
Complete and submit your Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation, including your differential diagnosis and critical-thinking process to formulate primary diagnosis.
Incorporate the following into your responses in the template:
- Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?
- Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?
- Assessment: Discuss the patient’s mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses with supporting evidence, listed in order from highest priority to lowest priority. Compare the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5 criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.
- Reflection notes: What would you do differently with this client if you could conduct the session over? Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NRNP 6635 WEEK 10 Assignment Assessing and Diagnosing Patients With Neurocognitive and Neurodevelopmental Disorders INSTRUCTIONS PLUS RUBRIC
Title: NRNP 6635 WEEK 10 Assignment Assessing and Diagnosing Patients With Neurocognitive and Neurodevelopmental Disorders INSTRUCTIONS PLUS RUBRIC
Subjective:
Biodata
Name S.H.
Sex: 11years
Informant: Mother
CC (chief complaint): “`My daughter has trouble paying attention and usually misplaces things”
HPI:
The mother reports that her daughter usually complains that the daughter has trouble paying attention both at school and at home. In school when instructions are given on assignments, she usually forgets about the assignments or even loses the list of assignments that she writes down. She therefore seldom completes her assignment, repeatedly makes careless mistakes in the assignment and her school performance have continuously been deteriorating. Even at home, she misplaces her items including her bracelet and at school, she loses her books and pencils. She is also finding it hard to sit still in the classroom and may not read a book for more than five minutes even when the book is interesting. Her troubles began when she was in kindergarten and have persisted ever since. She however reportedly enjoys playing video games and playing with Conley, her dog pet. The child has never been on care for any chronic illness and there is no history of trauma to the head preceding the complaints. She has also been experiencing difficulty in falling asleep and her sleep lasts only for 6 hours although it was lasting for 8-10hours before the onset of symptoms.
Past Psychiatric History:
- General Statement: this is the first time this child is visiting a psychiatrist. The mother is worried because of her inability to concentrate and forgetfulness.
- Caregivers (if applicable): the mother and the father
- Hospitalizations: no history of hospital admissions or management for chronic illnesses
- Medication trials: has never been on psychiatric medications
- Psychotherapy or Previous Psychiatric Diagnosis: no prior psychiatric diagnosis and has never undergone psychotherapy.
Substance Current Use and History: No history of substance use
Family Psychiatric/Substance Use History: the father takes a bottle of Vodka a week but has no history of taking other illicit drugs or cigarettes. The mother denies a history of using alcohol, cigarette, or other illicit drugs of abuse.
Psychosocial History: she is the third born in a family of 4. She only has brothers who are aged 20, 15, and 8 years but have no chronic illnesses. The father, 52years old is a high school teacher and the mother 47years old is a housewife; with no chronic illnesses. She lives with all her siblings and her parents who love her dearly and provides for her needs including emotional assurance. There is no family history of chronic illness or malignancy. No family history of psychiatric illnesses.
Medical History:
- Current Medications: Not currently taking any medications
- Allergies: NKFDA
- Reproductive Hx: she has not had her menarche and she is sexually inactive
ROS:
- GENERAL: no weight changes, no fever
- HEENT: no runny nose, no headache, no ear pain, no reduced vision, no red eye or eye pain
- SKIN: there are no skin ulcers or skin color changes
- CARDIOVASCULAR: no leg swelling, no orthopnea, no awareness of heartbeat
- RESPIRATORY: denies wheezing, chest pain, or difficulty in breathing
- GASTROINTESTINAL: reduced appetite but no pain in the abdomen, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea
- GENITOURINARY: no pain during urination, no hematuria, no abnormal discharges per vaginal, and denies menses
- NEUROLOGICAL: reduced sleep and difficulty in falling asleep, occasionally loses temper, and has forgetfulness but denies seizures, loss of consciousness, or headache.
- MUSCULOSKELETAL: denies muscle pain, joint swelling, or changes in gait
- HEMATOLOGIC: denies ease of bruising, paleness, and easy fatigability
- LYMPHATICS: no lymph node enlargement
- ENDOCRINOLOGIC: no polyuria, polydipsia, heat intolerance, or cold intolerance
Objective:
Physical exam: BP- 91/48, RR- 18, P- 55, Temp- 98.7F, HT- 51 in, WT- 50 lbs.,
General- Young girl sitting in the bed without respiratory distress or pain, not pale, no jaundice, no cyanosis, no lymphadenopathy, or lower limb edema. There are no neck swellings
Psychiatric- she has a congruent mood, and responds appropriately and courteously to the question, however unable to concentrate for long. Plays with the bracelet but cooperates with the examiner.
Diagnostic results:
Laboratory tests were ordered to assess for lead metal poisoning which may be for behavioral changes and reduced intelligence which are similar to the patient’s complaints. With lead poisoning, the neurodevelopmental status of the child would be affected and they would be more likely to experience reduced performance and even antisocial behavior (Sachdeva et al., 2018).
A complete blood count was also ordered to rule out infections that may present with forgetfulness and inability to pay attention in addition to other patient symptoms. It would also help to identify anemia that is usually experienced by patients with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) (Wang et al., 2018).
Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham version IV scale teacher form or SNAP-IV to help in screening for ADHD using the 90-question questionnaire (Wang et al., 2018).
Assessment:
Mental Status Examination:
The patient 11year old appears appropriate for her age and is well-groomed appropriate for the weather and of good hygiene. Her hair is well kept. She cooperates with the examiner but does not maintain appropriate direct eye contact with the examiner. Her speech rate is good although the volume is appropriate with questions asked and well-articulated. No flight of ideas or circumstantiality was identified. On inspection of her face, there are no abnormal movements although she is fidgeting and plays with her bracelet most of the time. Her mood is stable and congruent, affect is normal with no flat or overreactions. She has no delusions, or intrusive thoughts although she reports occasional daydreaming.
She is conscious, oriented×4. There is a gross abnormality in attention and concentration. She was unable to concentrate fully and was playing with the bracelet most of the time and admiring the pictures on the wall. Most of the time, the examiner repeated the questions to draw an answer from her. Her remote memory was equally poor as she couldn’t remember most of the questions that had been asked during the examination as was inquired upon by the examiner. Her intellect is good, she has good as she recognized that she had a problem although her judgment was poor as evidenced by the zoo incident.
Diagnosis Considerations:
S.H. is an 11years old child who presents with the complaint of inattention and misplacing things. In the course of the interview, the mother reveals that her teachers are also complaining about her inability to complete class assignments which has led to the deterioration of her class performance. Other signs and symptoms include difficulty in sitting still for long, impatience in turn-taking during conversations, poor memory, sleep difficulty, and trouble concentrating for long. In giving her a diagnosis, the DSM-V is applied to assess the symptoms, duration of illness, and other associated factors. The diagnosis that is most consistent with her symptoms is severe ADHD with the combined presentation because her symptoms that have been presenting for more than six months meet criteria 1 (inattention) and criteria 2 (hyperactivity-impulsivity). The reduced performance is therefore considered a result of inattention thus meeting criteria 1 (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).
Other diagnoses that have been considered include oppositional defiant disorder in which the patient’s symptoms are regarded to be resulting from personal defiance. However according to the American Psychiatric Association ( 2013, this diagnosis should only be made when the patient’s symptoms meet the diagnostic criteria of oppositional defiant disorder with at least four symptoms of argumentative/defiant behavior, angry/irritable mood, or vindictiveness which S.H did not present with. Another diagnosis that was also considered to explain her difficulty in paying attention and reduced class performance is Autism spectrum disorder. However, this diagnosis was also unlikely because its diagnostic criteria according to American Psychiatric Association ( 2013) require at least 2 features of persistent deficits in social communication or 3 features consistent with stereotyped movements which S.H did not present with.
Differential Diagnoses:
Severe ADHD with combined presentation (314.01[F90.2]): the presents with symptoms that meet criteria 1 and 2 for diagnosis of ADHD. She makes careless mistakes in classwork, reports difficulty in concentrating in reading for more than 5 minutes, is easily distracted during the examination, loses things at school and home, and reports being forgetful (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). These symptoms that have lasted for more than 6months have affected her school performance and are consistent with features of inattention. The other presentations such as fidgeting, leaving seats, and inappropriate actions at the zoo are however features of impulsivity and hyperactivity (Bélanger et al., 2018). This diagnosis is therefore most probable and is characterized as severe due to numerous signs and symptoms that the patient presented with (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).
Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) (F91.3): The patient’s difficulty in completing class assignments may be due to the personal defiance that is consistent with Oppositional defiant disorder diagnosis. However ODD is usually associated with at least four symptoms of argumentative/defiant behavior, angry/irritable mood, or vindictiveness that S.H did not present with (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Further, this diagnosis of ODD is less probable as it does not explain the forgetfulness and impulsivity reported by the patient.
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (299.00 [F84.0]): ASD might have presented with learning disabilities that S.H could report as failure to complete assignments. However, ASD diagnosis is only made when patient with 2 features of persistent deficits in social communication or 3 features consistent with stereotyped movements (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). S.H has no problem with communication, engages in playgroups, has no stereotyped movements and only occasionally becomes aggressive thus inconsistent with ASD (Hodges et al., 2020). It is therefore unlikely diagnosis.
Reflections:
The S.H case has enlightened me on how ADHD may present. Although most healthcare practitioners and even parents expect that patients with ADHD would present with an inability to sit for a longer time or difficulty in paying attention, it is worth noting that sometimes the patients present with the complications of ADHD. For instance, the young girl in the case study presented because of the careless mistakes in the exams that had led to the reduced accomplishment of class assignments as well as deterioration in overall performance. It is, therefore, necessary to highlight to the patient that the patient did not have an intellectual disability but rather could not pay attention which has affected their performance. It should therefore be emphasized that treatment of ADHD may result in better patient performance.
I have also learned of the mimics of ADHD such as lead poisoning that may present with similar manifestations as ADHD. A patient who presents with the symptoms, therefore, requires thorough investigation to rule out such poisoning. Further, the patient assessment should identify complications of ADHD such as malnutrition and anemia that may be addressed separately to promote the patient’s wellbeing.
NRNP 6635 WEEK 10 Assignment Assessing and Diagnosing Patients With Neurocognitive and Neurodevelopmental Disorders INSTRUCTIONS PLUS RUBRIC References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5 (R)) (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association Publishing.
Bélanger, S. A., Andrews, D., Gray, C., & Korczak, D. (2018). ADHD in children and youth: Part 1-Etiology, diagnosis, and comorbidity. Paediatrics & Child Health, 23(7), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxy109
Hodges, H., Fealko, C., & Soares, N. (2020). Autism spectrum disorder: definition, epidemiology, causes, and clinical evaluation. Translational Pediatrics, 9(Suppl 1), S55–S65. https://doi.org/10.21037/tp.2019.09.09
Sachdeva, C., Thakur, K., Sharma, A., & Sharma, K. K. (2018). Lead: Tiny but mighty poison. Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry: IJCB, 33(2), 132–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-017-0680-3
Wang, L.-J., Yu, Y.-H., Fu, M.-L., Yeh, W.-T., Hsu, J.-L., Yang, Y.-H., Chen, W. J., Chiang, B.-L., & Pan, W.-H. (2018). Attention deficit–hyperactivity disorder is associated with allergic symptoms and low levels of hemoglobin and serotonin. Scientific Reports, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28702-5
Photo Credit: Getty Images
Neurodevelopmental disorders begin in the developmental period of childhood and may continue through adulthood. They may range from the very specific to a general or global impairment, and often co-occur (APA, 2013). They include specific learning and language disorders, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorders, and intellectual disabilities. Neurocognitive disorders, on the other hand, represent a decline in one or more areas of prior mental function that is significant enough to impact independent functioning. They may occur at any time in life and be caused by factors such brain injury; diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, or Huntington’s; infection; or stroke, among others.
For this Assignment, you will assess a patient in a case study who presents with a neurocognitive or neurodevelopmental disorder.
To Prepare:
- Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide. Consider how neurocognitive impairments may have similar presentations to other psychological disorders.
- Review the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation template, which you will use to complete this Assignment.
- By Day 1 of this week, select a specific video case study to use for this Assignment from the Video Case Selections choices in the Learning Resources. View your assigned video case and review the additional data for the case in the “Case History Reports” document, keeping the requirements of the evaluation template in mind.
- Consider what history would be necessary to collect from this patient.
- Consider what interview questions you would need to ask this patient.
- Identify at least three possible differential diagnoses for the patient.
By Day 7 of Week 10
Complete and submit your Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation, including your differential diagnosis and critical-thinking process to formulate primary diagnosis.
Incorporate the following into your responses in the template:
- Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?
- Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?
- Assessment: Discuss the patient’s mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses with supporting evidence, listed in order from highest priority to lowest priority. Compare the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5 criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.
- Reflection notes: What would you do differently with this client if you could conduct the session over? Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK10Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
- Click the Week 10 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
- Click the Week 10 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK10Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
- Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 10 Assignment Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 10 Assignment draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 10
To participate in this Assignment:
Week 10 Assignment
NRNP 6635 WEEK 10 Assignment Assessing and Diagnosing Patients With Neurocognitive and Neurodevelopmental Disorders INSTRUCTIONS PLUS RUBRIC Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Name: NRNP_6635_Week10_Assignment_Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |||
| Create documentation in the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template about the patient you selected.
In the Subjective section, provide: |
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response throughly and accurately describes the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. |
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately describes the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response describes the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis, but is somewhat vague or contains minor innacuracies. |
0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate description of the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. Or, subjective documentation is missing. |
||
| In the Objective section, provide: • Physical exam documentation of systems pertinent to the chief complaint, HPI, and history • Diagnostic results, including any labs, imaging, or other assessments needed to develop the differential diagnoses. |
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response thoroughly and accurately documents the patient’s physical exam for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are thoroughly and accurately documented. |
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately documents the patient’s physical exam for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are accurately documented. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Documentation of the patient’s physical exam is somewhat vague or contains minor innacuracies. Diagnostic tests and their results are documented but contain minor innacuracies. |
0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response provides incomplete or inaccurate documentation of the patient’s physical exam. Systems may have been unnecessarily reviewed, or, objective documentation is missing. |
||
| In the Assessment section, provide: • Results of the mental status examination, presented in paragraph form. • At least three differentials with supporting evidence. List them from top priority to least priority. Compare the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5 criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case. |
23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The response thoroughly and accurately documents the results of the mental status exam. Response lists at least three distinctly different and detailed possible disorders in order of priority for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, and it provides a thorough, accurate, and detailed justification for each of the disorders selected. |
20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The response accurately documents the results of the mental status exam. Response lists at least three distinctly different and detailed possible disorders in order of priority for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, and it provides an accurate justification for each of the disorders selected. |
18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
The response documents the results of the mental status exam with some vagueness or innacuracy. Response lists at least three different possible disorders for a differential diagnosis of the patient and provides a justification for each, but may contain some vaguess or innacuracy. |
0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate description of the results of the mental status exam and explanation of the differential diagnoses. Or, assessment documentation is missing. |
||
| Reflect on this case. Discuss what you learned and what you might do differently. Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.). | 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Reflections are thorough, thoughtful, and demonstrate critical thinking. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Reflections demonstrate critical thinking. |
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Reflections are somewhat general or do not demonstrate critical thinking. |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Reflections are incomplete, inaccurate, or missing. |
||
| Provide at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines that relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differential diagnoses. Be sure they are current (no more than 5 years old). | 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature to support the assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study. The resources reflect the latest clinical guidelines and provide strong justification for decision making. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature that appropriately support the assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study. |
11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
Three evidence-based resources are provided to support assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, but they may only provide vague or weak justification. |
0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
Two or fewer resources are provided to support assessment and diagnosis decisions. The resources may not be current or evidence based. |
||
| Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph development and organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. |
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. |
||
| Written Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and punctuation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors |
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ five) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding |
||
| Total Points: 100 | ||||||
Name: NRNP_6635_Week10_Assignment_Rubric
NRNP 6635 WEEK 10 Assignment Assessing and Diagnosing Patients With Neurocognitive and Neurodevelopmental Disorders INSTRUCTIONS PLUS RUBRIC Grading Rubric
| Performance Category | 100% or highest level of performance
100% 16 points |
Very good or high level of performance
88% 14 points |
Acceptable level of performance
81% 13 points |
Inadequate demonstration of expectations
68% 11 points |
Deficient level of performance
56% 9 points
|
Failing level
of performance 55% or less 0 points |
| Total Points Possible= 50 | 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points |
| Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics. |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements
|
| 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points | |
| Application of Course Knowledge
Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements
|
| 10 Points | 9 Points | 6 Points | 0 Points | |||
| Interactive Dialogue
Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic. |
Demonstrated all of the following:
|
Demonstrated 3 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 2 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:
|
||
| 8 Points | 7 Points | 6 Points | 5 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
| Grammar, Syntax, APA
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error. |
The following was present:
AND
AND
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
| 0 Points Deducted | 5 Points Lost | |||||
| Participation
Requirements |
Demonstrated the following:
|
Failed to demonstrate the following:
|
||||
| 0 Points Lost | 5 Points Lost | |||||
| Due Date Requirements | Demonstrated all of the following:
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Demonstrates one or less of the following.
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |