NR 507 Week 6 Recorded Disease Process Presentation 

NR 507 Week 6 Recorded Disease Process Presentation 

NR 507 Week 6 Recorded Disease Process Presentation 

The Recorded Disease Process Presentation assignment must be submitted for faculty grading by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6. The guidelines and grading rubric are located in the Course Resource section. 

This assignment will follow the late assignment policy specified in the course syllabus. 

Reminder: The Recorded Disease Process Presentation assignment must also be uploaded into the discussion area by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 6. All questions must be addressed by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6. NR 507 Week 6 Recorded Disease Process Presentation 

Rubric 

NR507 Week 6 Recorded Disease Process Presentation

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NR 507 Week 6 Recorded Disease Process Presentation  

NR507 Week 6 Recorded Disease Process Presentation 
Criteria  Ratings  Pts 
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Course Knowledge 
70.0 pts 

Exceptional- The recorded presentation includes clear presentation of all required concepts: -Introduction of disease with brief definition and description. -Risk factors with link to etiology provided. -Implications of health care provider in disease prevention. -Shows progression from the initial injury to the defect in the tissue, organ, and system functioning. – Links changes in the tissue, organ, and system functioning to the initial presenting signs and symptoms seen in primary care of the disease. – Provides a brief description of how the disease is diagnosed. – Provide a brief description of the pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions used to treat and manage the disease. All concepts are presented with logical thought process. 

61.0 pts 

Exceeds- The recorded presentation includes clear presentation of all required concepts and linkages, but may lack some applicability to topic or misses one criteria in some way. 

57.0 pts 

Meets- The recorded presentation has limited perspective, unclear linkages, insights and/or applicability to topic or does not meet one or more of the criteria of the assignment. 

28.0 pts 

Needs Improvement- The recorded presentation contains inaccurate information and is not consistent with current practice. No clear linkages provided. Analysis is minimal. 

0.0 pts 

Developing- The recorded presentation offers no insight or application to the assignment or course content. 

 

70.0 pts 
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport from Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) 
60.0 pts 

Exceptional- Scholarly literature is present throughout the presentation. Guidelines regarding disease prevention and pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions are addressed and clearly analyzed. 

52.0 pts 

Exceeds- Where applicable in in the recorded presentation, analysis is partially supported by evidence from appropriate sources published within the last 5 years. In-text citations and full references are provided. Evidence-based, peer reviewed journal article cited but may not fully support disease prevention and pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. 

49.0 pts 

Meets- Where applicable in the recorded presentation, analysis is partially supported by evidence. Sources may not be scholarly in nature or may be older than 5 years. Guidelines are not used. In-text citations and/or full references may be incomplete or missing. 

24.0 pts 

Needs Improvement- Citations to non-scholarly websites given as rationale to support disease prevention and pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. 

0.0 pts 

Developing- Presentation contains no evidence-based practice reference or citation. 

 

60.0 pts 
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of Disease Process 
50.0 pts 

Exceptional- Summarizes the disease using concise statements that reflect all content covered in the presentation. Implications for practice addressed. 

44.0 pts 

Exceeds- Summarizes the disease using concise statements that reflect all content covered in the presentation. Implications for practice not clearly evident. 

41.0 pts 

Meets- Summarizes the disease using concise statements with some content not reflected in the summary. Implications for practice not clearly evident or missing. 

20.0 pts 

Needs Improvement- Summary of the disease process is lacking concise statements and all content not reflected in the summary. Implications for practice not addressed or not clearly evident. 

0.0 pts 

Developing- No summary of the disease process provided. Implications for practice not addressed. 

 

50.0 pts 
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism/ Organization 
10.0 pts 

Exceptional- The recorded presentation has clear audio and video. The content flows in a logical, smooth manner. Verbal pauses are limited or absent. Student speaks in a clear cadence and speed. 

9.0 pts 

Exceeds- The recorded presentation is lacking 1-2 components from the 50 point criteria 

8.0 pts 

Meets- The recorded presentation is lacking 3-4 components from the 50 point criteria. 

4.0 pts 

Needs Improvement- Presentation presents findings that are sometimes unclear to follow and may not always be relevant to topic and concepts are difficult to follow. 

0.0 pts 

Developing- The audio/video is hard to hear/see. Slides contain lengthy content (student reading from slides). Presentation style lacks flow of ideas and thoughts. 

 

10.0 pts 
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Syntax, Spelling, & Punctuation 
10.0 pts 

Exceptional- Grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one error. 

9.0 pts 

Exceeds- Two to four errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. 

8.0 pts 

Meets- Five to seven errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. 

4.0 pts 

Needs Improvement- Eight to nine errors grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. 

0.0 pts 

Developing- Post contains ten or greater errors grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback. 

 

10.0 pts 
Total Points: 200.0 

 Your PowerPoint included clear presentation of all the required topics, including guidelines for disease prevention and pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions, summary of the disease, and implications for practice. You appropriately cited scholarly literature published within the last five years, along with in-text citations. Your presentation flowed in a logical, smooth manner, with clear audio and video, and accurate grammar, syntax, and APA format. I especially liked your discussion about the diagnosis. Way to go! 

 See Also: NR 507 Week 2: Discussion Part Two