NR 703 Week 7 :Explore ethical dilemma outcomes of organizational and leadership behavior such as mobbing and bullying that have an adverse impact on advanced nursing practice and interprofessional collaboration

NR 703 Week 7 Explore ethical dilemma outcomes of organizational and leadership behavior such as mobbing and bullying that have an adverse impact on advanced nursing practice and interprofessional collaboration

Advanced Practice Leadership Paper

from an ethic of care

Guidelines

Purpose

The purpose of this application is to provide the student an
opportunity to critically appraise advanced nursing practice leadership from an
ethic of care perspective.

Course Outcomes

This assignment provides documentation of student ability to
meet the following course outcomes.

CO4: Assimilate relationship-based and patient-centered care
attributes for interprofessional collaboration in advanced nursing practice (PO
#8).

CO6: Formulate selected strategies for increasing
interprofessional collaboration and influence

across diverse personal, professional, and/or practice
settings (PO #8).

CO7: Explore ethical dilemma outcomes of organizational and
leadership behavior such as mobbing and bullying that have an adverse impact on
advanced nursing practice and interprofessional collaboration (PO #8).

NR 703 Week 7 Explore ethical dilemma outcomes of organizational and leadership behavior

Due Date

Submit your completed application by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of
Week 7 as directed.

Requirements

1. To complete
this application, you will need to access to the following databases: CINAHL,
MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and the Joanna Briggs Institute. You may access
these databases through the Chamberlain College of Nursing Online Library. The
library has a main menu available at http://library.chamberlain.edu/index.html
with a link for Research Help in the left-hand menu. When clicked, it reveals a
list of “Tools” or PDFs on how to do conduct various searches of the
required databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and JBI) through the portals
(EBSCO and OVID) provided.

2. The Advanced
Nursing Practice Leadership from an ethic of care paper is worth 275 points and
will be graded on quality of information, use of citations, use of standard
English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the
required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria
rubric.

3. Create your
manuscript using Microsoft Word 2010 (a part of Microsoft Office 2010) or later
version, which is the required format for all Chamberlain College of Nursing
documents. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word 2010 document
because it will end in “.docx.”

4. Follow the
directions and grading criteria closely. Any questions about this paper may be
posted under the Q & A Forum.

5. The length of
the paper is to be no fewer than six and no greater than eight pages, excluding
the title page and reference pages.

6. APA format is
required with both a title page and reference page. Use the required components
of the review as Level 1 headings (upper and lower case, centered, boldface):

Note: Write an introduction to the advanced nursing practice
leadership dynamic but do not use “Introduction” as a heading in accordance
with the rules put forth in the Publication Manual of the American
Psychological Association (2010, p. 63).

a. Description of
ethic of care versus ethic of justice perspectives

b. Reflection on
the application from an ethic of care perspective

c. NR 703 Week 7 :Explore ethical dilemma outcomes of organizational and leadership behavior such as mobbing and bullying that have an adverse impact on advanced nursing practice and interprofessional collaboration Conclusion

Preparing the Paper

The following are best practices for preparing this paper.

1. When
introducing the advanced nursing practice leadership dynamic, be sure to
identify appropriate background information regarding the practice situation (who,
what, where, when, and why).

2. When describing
ethic of care versus ethic of justice perspectives, be sure to fully describe
the potential impacts of each ethical perspective using current evidence.

3. When reflecting
on the application from an ethic of care dynamic, be sure to fully critique
factors that compel an ethic of care in today’s healthcare environment.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NR 703 Week 7 :Explore ethical dilemma outcomes of organizational and leadership behavior such as mobbing and bullying that have an adverse impact on advanced nursing practice and interprofessional collaboration

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable	No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions. Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Application of Course Knowledge – Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources; Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources. Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content	Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson. Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson	Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post. Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life	Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category	5	4	3	2	0
Interactive Dialogue Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days. *(5 points possible per graded thread)*	Exceeds minimum post requirements Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days. Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days Replies to a question posed by a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days. The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty	Has only one post for the week Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments	Does not post to the thread No connections are made to the topic
	Minus 1 Point	Minus 2 Point	Minus 3 Point	Minus 4 Point	Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted. Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition	2-3 errors in APA format. Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors. Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.	4-5 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is somewhat focused.	6-7 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.	8-10 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.	Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format. Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style does not facilitate communication. The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
	0 points lost				-5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements *per discussion thread*	The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.				The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement *per discussion thread*	The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.				The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.