NR 601 Week 3 Case Study Discussions Physical Examination (Part-1) choose geriatric assessment tools
that would be appropriate to use in conducting a thorough geriatric assessment
NR 601 Week 3 Case Study Discussions Physical Examination Part 1 choose geriatric assessment tools
that would be appropriate to use in conducting a thorough geriatric assessment
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 601 Week 3 Case Study Discussions Physical Examination (Part-1) choose geriatric assessment tools
that would be appropriate to use in conducting a thorough geriatric assessment
Discussion Part One (graded)
Katie Smith, a 65 year-old female of Irish descent, is being seen in your office for an annual physical exam. You are concerned since she has rescheduled her appointment three times after forgetting about it. She and her husband John are currently living with their daughter Mary, son-in-law Patrick, and their four children. She confesses that while she loves her family and appreciates her daughter’s hospitality, she misses having her own home. As she is telling you this, you notice that she develops tears in her eyes and does not make eye contact with you.
Background:
Although Mrs. Smith is scheduled for an annual physical exam and reports no particular chief complaint, you will need to complete a detailed geriatric assessment. Katie reports a lack of appetite. She tells you that she nibbles most of the time rather than eating full meals. She also reports having insomnia on a regular basis.
PMH:
Katie reports a recent bout of pneumonia approximately 3 months ago, but did not require hospitalization. She also has a history of HTN and high cholesterol.
Current medications:
HCTZ 25mg daily
Evista 60mg daily
Multivitamin daily
Surgeries:
Appendectomy as a child in Ireland (date unknown)
1968- Cesarean section
Allergies: Denies food, drug, or environmental allergies
Vaccination History:
Cannot remember when she had her last influenza vaccine
Does not recall having received a Pneumovax
Her last TD was greater than 10 years ago
Has not had the herpes zoster vaccine
Screening History:
Last Colonoscopy was 12 years ago
Last mammogram was 4 years ago
Has never had a DEXA/Bone Density Test
Social history:
Emigrated with her husband from Ireland in her 20s and has always lived in the same house until recently. She retired a year and a half ago from 30 years of teaching elementary school; has never smoked but drinks alcohol socially. She states that she does not have an advanced directive, but her daughter Mary keeps asking her about setting one up.
Family history:
Both parents are deceased but lived disease-free up into their late 90s. She has one daughter who is 44 years old with no chronic illness and two sons, ages 42 and 40, both in good health.
Discussion Day 1:
Differential Diagnoses with rationale
Further ROS questions needed to develop DD
Based on the patient data provided, choose geriatric assessment tools
that would be appropriate to use in conducting a thorough geriatric assessment. Provide a rationale on why you are choosing these particular tools.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 601 Week 3 Case Study Discussions Physical Examination (Part-1) choose geriatric assessment tools
that would be appropriate to use in conducting a thorough geriatric assessment
NR 601 Week 3 Case Study Discussions Physical Examination (Part-1) choose geriatric assessment tools that would be appropriate to use in conducting a thorough geriatric assessment Grading Rubric Guidelines
| Performance Category |
10 |
9 |
8 |
4 |
0 |
| Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions. |
- Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
- Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
- Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
|
- Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
- Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
- Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
|
- Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
- Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
- Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
- Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
|
- Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
- Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
- The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
|
- No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
- Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
|
| Performance Category |
10 |
9 |
8 |
4 |
0 |
| Application of Course Knowledge –
Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
- Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
- Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
|
- Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
- Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
- Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
|
- Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
- Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
- Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
|
- Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
- Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
- Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
|
- Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
- No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
|
| Performance Category |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
| Interactive Dialogue
Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.
(5 points possible per graded thread) |
- Exceeds minimum post requirements
- Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
- Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
- Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
|
- Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
- Replies to a question posed by a peer
Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. |
- Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
- The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
- Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
|
- Has only one post for the week
- Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
|
- Does not post to the thread
- No connections are made to the topic
|
| |
Minus 1 Point |
Minus 2 Point |
Minus 3 Point |
Minus 4 Point |
Minus 5 Point |
| Grammar, Syntax, APA
Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.
The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition |
- 2-3 errors in APA format.
- Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
- Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
|
- 4-5 errors in APA format.
- Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
- Writing style is somewhat focused.
|
- 6-7 errors in APA format.
- Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
- Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
|
- 8-10 errors in APA format.
- Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
- Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
|
- Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
- Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
- Writing style does not facilitate communication.
- The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
|
|
0 points lost |
|
|
|
-5 points lost |
| Total Participation Requirements
per discussion thread |
The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. |
|
|
|
The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days |
| Early Participation Requirement
per discussion thread |
The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. |
|
|
|
The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT. |
Also Read: NR 601 Week 2 Case Study Discussions Physical Examination (Part-2) Discuss the differential diagnosis and rationale for choosing the primary diagnosis
