NR 508 Week 6: Grand Rounds Presentation Assignment

Sample Answer for NR 508 Week 6: Grand Rounds Presentation Assignment Included After Question

NR 508 Week 6: Grand Rounds Presentation Assignment

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds Presentation Assignment

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 508 Week 6: Grand Rounds Presentation Assignment

Week 6: Grand Rounds Presentation Assignment

  • DueOct 14 by 11:59pm

 

  • Points75

 

  • Submittingan external tool
  • AvailableAug 26 at 12am – Oct 17 at 11:59pm about 2 months

This assignment was locked Oct 17 at 11:59pm.

The Grand Rounds Narrated Presentation assignment must be submitted by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6. The guidelines and grading rubric are located in the course resource section.

The narrated presentation should also be uploaded into the Week 7 Grand Rounds Discussion by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6.

Please use Voice Thread to complete your narration. Instructions on using Voice Thread can be found under Course Resources.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 508 Week 6: Grand Rounds Presentation Assignment

Title: NR 508 Week 6: Grand Rounds Presentation Assignment

This assignment will follow the late assignment policy specified in the course syllabus.

NR 508 Week 6: Grand Rounds Presentation Assignment Rubric

NR508 Grand Rounds Week 6

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds Presentation Assignment
NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds Presentation Assignment
NR508 Grand Rounds Week 6
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNarrated Case Study Presentation
15.0 pts

Exceptional- Presents a Voice Thread narrated case using a fictional patient who presents to clinic with assigned medical condition. Provides detailed description of patient, including signs and symptoms of condition.

 13.0 pts

Exceeds- Presents a Voice Thread narrated case using a fictional patient who presents to clinic with assigned medical condition. Provides detailed description of patient, but omits some signs and symptoms of condition.

 12.0 pts

Meets- Presents a Voice Thread narrated case using a fictional patient who presents to clinic with assigned medical condition. Provides vague description of patient and omits some signs and symptoms of condition.

 6.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Presents a Voice Thread narrated case using a fictional patient who presents to clinic with assigned medical condition, but does not provide description of patient, including signs and symptoms of condition.

 0.0 pts

Developing- Does not present a narrated case study.
15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedication Management
20.0 pts

Exceptional- Describes, in detail, the first line prescribed drugs for condition, including trade and generic names, typical dosages, mechanism of action, adverse effects, and major contraindications and interactions. Describes alternate therapies.

 18.0 pts

Exceeds- Generally describes the first line prescribed drugs for condition, omitting one of the following: trade and generic names, typical dosages, mechanism of action, adverse effects, and major contraindications and interactions, and alternate therapies.

 16.0 pts

Meets- Generally describes the first line prescribed drugs for condition, omitting 2-3 of the following: trade and generic names, typical dosages, mechanism of action, adverse effects, and major contraindications and interactions, and alternate therapies.

 8.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Generally describes the first line prescribed drugs for condition, or incorrectly identifies first line drug, omitting 4 or more of the following: trade and generic names, typical dosages, mechanism of action, adverse effects, and major contraindications and interactions, and alternate therapies.

 0.0 pts

Developing- Does not describe medications for condition
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence-Based Support
10.0 pts

Exceptional- Provides evidence from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources. Includes evidence from Dreischulte & Guthrie (2012) article.

 9.0 pts

Exceeds- Provides evidence from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources. Does not include evidence from Dreischulte & Guthrie (2012) article.

 8.0 pts

Meets- Provides evidence from sources other than clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources. Includes evidence from Dreischulte & Guthrie (2012) article.

 4.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Provides evidence from sources other than clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources. Does not include evidence from Dreischulte & Guthrie (2012) article.

 0.0 pts

Developing- Does not provide evidence to support.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBarriers to Practice
5.0 pts

Exceptional- Describes potential barriers, issues, or problems related to disease process and prescribing, including potential issues related to cultural or socioeconomic diversity and healthcare literacy.

 4.0 pts

Exceeds- Describes potential barriers, issues, or problems related to disease process and prescribing, but omits potential issues related to either cultural, socioeconomic diversity, or healthcare literacy.

 3.0 pts

Meets- Describes potential barriers, issues, or problems related to disease process and prescribing, but omits potential issues related to two of the following: cultural, socioeconomic diversity, or healthcare literacy.

 1.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Describes potential barriers, issues, or problems related to disease process and prescribing, but omits potential issues related to cultural, socioeconomic diversity, AND healthcare literacy.

 0.0 pts

Developing- Does not describe potential barriers
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentifying Outcomes
5.0 pts

Exceptional- Describe optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication, including expected follow up care.

 4.0 pts

Exceeds- Describe optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication, does not include expected follow up care.

 3.0 pts

Meets- Incorrectly identifies optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication, including expected follow up care.

 1.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Incorrectly identifies optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication, does not include expected follow up care.

 0.0 pts

Developing- Does not address outcomes.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTest Questions
15.0 pts

Exceptional- Includes five (5) knowledge-based questions with correct responses related to presentation materials submitted as a comment to the assignment dropbox.

 13.0 pts

Exceeds- Includes four (4) knowledge-based questions with correct responses related to presentation materials submitted as a comment to the assignment dropbox.

 12.0 pts

Meets- Includes two-three (2-3) knowledge-based questions related to presentation materials OR Includes five (5) questions but does not include correct responses.

 6.0 pts

Needs Improvement- Includes one (1) knowledge-based question related to presentation materials.

 0.0 pts

Developing- Does not include questions.
15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting
5.0 pts

Exceptional- Slides are clear and easy to read. No more than 15 slides (excluding test question and reference slides) are submitted. . Oral presentation is no less than 8 mins and no longer than 12 minutes. References use APA format.

 0.0 pts

Developing- Slides are not clear and easy to read. More than 15 slides (excluding test question and reference slides) are submitted. . Oral presentation is no less than 8 mins and no longer than 12 minutes. References include errors in APA format.
5.0 pts
Total Points: 75.0

PreviousNext

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 508 Week 6: Grand Rounds Presentation Assignment

NR 508 Week 6: Grand Rounds Presentation Assignment Grading Rubric

Performance Category 100% or highest level of performance

100%

16 points

 Very good or high level of performance

88%

14 points

 Acceptable level of performance

81%

13 points

 Inadequate demonstration of expectations

68%

11 points

 Deficient level of performance

56%

9 points

 

 Failing level

of performance

55% or less

0 points
 Total Points Possible= 50           16 Points    14 Points 13 Points        11 Points           9 Points          0 Points
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.

 Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
  

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
  

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
 16 Points  14 Points  13 Points 11 Points 9 Points  0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge

Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

 Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
 Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
 Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
   10 Points 9 Points  6 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue

Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)

The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)

Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.

 Demonstrated all of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
 Demonstrated 3 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
 Demonstrated 2 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
 Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
  8 Points 7 Points  6 Points         5 Points          4 Points  0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.

 The following was present:

  • 0-3 errors in APA format

AND

  • Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND

  • Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.
 The following was present:

  • 4-6 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.
 The following was present:

  • 7-9 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.
  

The following was present:

  • 10- 12 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.
  

The following was present:

  • 13 – 15 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.

AND/OR

  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.
 The following was present:

  • 16 to greater errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style does not facilitate communication
  0 Points Deducted 5 Points Lost
Participation

Requirements

Demonstrated the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
 Failed to demonstrate the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
  0 Points Lost 5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements Demonstrated all of the following:

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Demonstrates one or less of the following.

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Read Also:  NR 508 Week 6 Discussion: challenging aspects of prescribing medications