NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation Assignment
The Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation is due by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7. The guidelines are listed below. The guidelines and grading rubric are also located in Course Resources.
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation Assignment
Title: NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation Assignment
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to: (a) identify and reflect upon key concepts related to your policymaker visit; (b) provide empirical evidence to support new insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policy making process; and (c) present ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner.
Course Outcomes
CO 1: Employ strategies to impact the development, implementation, and consequences of holistic-focused healthcare policies using evidence-based practice principles. (PO 1)
CO 2: Communicate with decision-makers to advocate for effective policies that impact nurses and nursing, consumers, or the healthcare system to foster population health including quality and safety. (PO 2)
CO 3: Demonstrate professional and personal growth concerning the advocacy role of the advanced practice nurse in fostering policy within diverse healthcare settings. (PO 3)
CO 4: Analyze social, historical, ethical, and political contexts of healthcare policies while integrating professional values to impact population health. (PO 4)
CO 5: Advocate for institutional, local, national, and international policies that fosters person-centered healthcare and nursing practice. (PO 5)
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7
Total Points: 275 points
Requirements
Assignment Criteria for Presentation
Describe your visit/presentation, including any PowerPoint presentation materials that you utilized during your policymaker visit. Limit these slides to five slides in this project (of the 15 total slides). This includes any handouts that you left with the policymaker.
Discuss the response of the policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s).
Reflect on the process, follow-up plans, insights gained about the issue and process, and support with evidence.
Describe possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing.
Provide concluding statements summarizing the content.
Develop a 15-slide PowerPoint presentation with speaker notes in APA format, not including title and reference slides. Write speaker notes sufficient enough to enable someone to take over or give the presentation other than you.
Preparing the Presentation
After completing Policymaker Visit Ungraded Worksheet 3, develop an electronic presentation to describe, analyze, and reflect upon your policymaking visit. Include 5 slides from the PowerPoint presentation that you would have used during an actual policymaker visit. Include a minimum of five (5) classic or current references within the past 5 years that specifically support insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policymaking process.
NR 506 Week 7 Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation Assignment
NR 506 Week 7 Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation Assignment Rubric
W7 Policymaker Presentation
W7 Policymaker Presentation
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisit Description
50.0 pts
Clearly describes the policymaking visit/presentation (includes actual presentation)
44.0 pts
Description of visit/presentation has rare inaccuracy.
40.0 pts
Description of visit/presentation lacks occasional important element or specificity.
19.0 pts
Description of visit/presentation has multiple instances of inaccuracies or is not addressed
0.0 pts
Does not identify, define or describe the healthcare policy.
50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePolicymaker Response
50.0 pts
Slides and speaker notes discuss response of policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s) and is clearly articulated.
44.0 pts
Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has rare inaccuracy.
40.0 pts
Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response occasionally inaccurate or lacks occasional important elements or specificity.
19.0 pts
Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has multiple inaccuracies or lacks sufficient level of detail.
0.0 pts
Slides and speaker notes do not discuss the policymaker response.
50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflections on Process
50.0 pts
Reflections on process (including supportive evidence), follow-up, and insights gained (issue and process) are clearly described in slide and speaker notes.
44.0 pts
Reflection on process, supportive evidence, follow-up, and insights gained has rare inaccuracy within slides and speaker notes.
40.0 pts
Occasionally inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks occasional important elements or specificity.
19.0 pts
Reflection on process, evidence, follow-up, and insights is inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks sufficient detail.
0.0 pts
There is no reflection on process.
50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFuture Opportunities
50.0 pts
Clearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing.
44.0 pts
Describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing with need for further detail or clarity.
40.0 pts
Clearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting but no mention of importance to nursing
19.0 pts
Minimal description of possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and no discussion of importance to nursing.
0.0 pts
Does not describe possible future opportunities or their importance to nursing.
50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
45.0 pts
Concluding statements summarize content in a clear and articulated manner.
40.0 pts
Concluding statements summarizing content have rare inaccuracy or lack of minor details/clarity.
36.0 pts
Concluding statements lack occasional important element or specificity.
17.0 pts
Concluding statements have multiple instances of inaccuracies or little detail.
0.0 pts
No conclusion
45.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA format
15.0 pts
Slides, speaker notes, and references are completely are free from APA errors throughout.
13.0 pts
There are 2-3 APA format errors.
12.0 pts
There are 4-6 APA format errors
6.0 pts
There are 6-7 APA format errors.
0.0 pts
Eight or more errors in APA, grammar, spelling and syntax and/or citations are missing
15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation/Writing
15.0 pts
Slide and speaker notes content are accurate. Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. Balance among space, words/graphics, and color is effective.
13.0 pts
Presentations slides are professional in appearance and tone with rare exceptions. Slides are + 1 of required number. Speaker notes contain presentation content with rare repetition of slides. Speaker notes lack minor detail or clarity.
12.0 pts
Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone with occasional areas needing improvements in style. Slides are + 2 of required number. Speaker notes contain presentation content with occasional repetition of slides. Speaker notes lack detail or clarity.
6.0 pts
Most presentation slides are not professional in appearance and tone with numerous areas needing improvements in style. Slides are + 3 of required number. Speaker notes contain presentation content with multiple repetitions of slides or lack significant detail.
0.0 pts
Presentation includes numerous crowded slides and has no flow.
Fride, I am sorry you were not able to secure a visit because I found your presentation to be exceptional. I very much appreciate your concern for undocumented immigrants and their healthcare needs. Henny
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in threeor more of the following elements
Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
16 Points
14 Points
13 Points
11 Points
9 Points
0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge
Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements
Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.
Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
10 Points
9 Points
6 Points
0 Points
Interactive Dialogue
Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)
The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)
Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.
Demonstrated all of the following:
Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
Responses are substantive
Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 3 of the following:
Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
Responses are substantive
Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 2 of the following:
Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
Responses are substantive
Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:
Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
Responses are substantive
Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
8 Points
7 Points
6 Points
5 Points
4 Points
0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.
The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition
Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.
The following was present:
0-3 errors in APA format
AND
Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors
AND
Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.
The following was present:
4-6 errors in APA format.
AND/OR
Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors
AND/OR
Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.
The following was present:
7-9 errors in APA format.
AND/OR
Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors
AND/OR
Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.
The following was present:
10- 12 errors in APA format
AND/OR
Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors
AND/OR
Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.
The following was present:
13 – 15 errors in APA format
AND/OR
Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors
AND/OR
Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.
AND/OR
The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.
The following was present:
16 to greater errors in APA format.
AND/OR
Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.
AND/OR
Writing style does not facilitate communication
0 Points Deducted
5 Points Lost
Participation
Requirements
Demonstrated the following:
Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
Failed to demonstrate the following:
Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
0 Points Lost
5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements
Demonstrated all of the following:
The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
Demonstrates oneor less of the following.
The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
