Boost your Grades with us today!
Sample Answer for NR 506 Week 4 DQ Challenges in Lobbying Strategies Included After Question
NR 506 Week 4 DQ Challenges in Lobbying Strategies
NR 506 Week 4 DQ Challenges in Lobbying Strategies
Week 4: Challenges in Lobbying Strategies
3838 unread replies.7979 replies.
Discuss the best approach for communicating with your local legislator or policymaker in your policy-priority issue. What is your rationale for this approach?
This topic is closed for comments.
Search entries or author Filter replies by unreadUnread Collapse replies Expand replies
Mar 18, 2018Mar 18 at 8:57pm
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 506 Week 4 DQ Challenges in Lobbying Strategies
Title: NR 506 Week 4 DQ Challenges in Lobbying Strategies
As far as meeting with local legislators or policymakers, I am sure that the best approach would be trying to find a time to meet face to face with them. However, due to the current circumstances, I think a telephone call or e-mail may work best. Illinois State Representative, Norine Hammond, is running for re-election this year and the Primary election starts on Tuesday. I feel that she has much more important things to do for her own success than to take time to meet with me. Of course, I have never met her, so she could be willing to take the time to sit down and talk, but I will understand if she would rather not due to the timing. Timing could also be a factor as I am due to have another baby at any time in the next 2 ½ weeks. I would hate to schedule a time to meet with her and then have to back out due to being in the hospital or trying to recover at home. As I mentioned, if she would meet with me, I would make sure she was aware of my circumstances in case I had to cancel at the last minute.
I think e-mail is less personal of course, but I also think it is much easier for people who have a busy schedule, because it then allows them to respond at their convenience. With the Primary election beginning this week, Ms. Hammond will definitely be busy. However, it is said that someone would need to ask six people in person to have the same power of an email with 200 recipients (Bohns, 2017). For that reason, I would prefer a phone call conversation over an email conversation. I also think that conversations over email or text can easily be misinterpreted and I think there is great significance in immediate responses as well as changes in voice. I know for me personally, it is much easier to say “no” in an email than it is on the phone or in person. It is also easier for me to argue my case in person rather than in text form.
Because Ms. Hammond will be helping me out with my class, I will be appreciative of whatever she has to offer.
Reference: NR 506 Week 4 DQ Challenges in Lobbying Strategies
Bohns, V. (2017). A face-to-face request is 34 times more successful than an email. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2017/04/a-face-to-face-request-is-34-times-more-successful-than-an-email
Mar 22, 2018Mar 22 at 5:10pm
I liked your post. I think meeting with a state representative that is currently going through a re-election year is interesting. If you could possibly meet with this person face-to-face that would mean so much more than just discussing healthcare policy issues. You could speak about her future election and the implications that may have on her career. The side that she takes on your healthcare policy issue could even play a role into how may vote in the coming election (barring that you are in her district to vote). However, like you stated, having an e-mail conversation can essentially provide you with the proper means of attaining all the information you will need for this class and your healthcare policy issue. Here’s what I found during my research related to e-mail communication with legislators, Results indicate that e-mail is much more useful to communicate with some audiences than others. In particular, legislators in our sample are very likely to see e-mail as a positive development for communicating with constituents and policy insiders with somewhat less positive views on e-mail with intermediary groups” Richardson (2006).
References NR 506 Week 4 DQ Challenges in Lobbying Strategies
Richardson, J. E., & Cooper, C. A. (2006). E-mail Communication and the Policy Process in the State Legislature. Policy Studies Journal, 34(1), 113-129. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00148.x
Mar 23, 2018Mar 23 at 8:02pm
Phillip and Andrea, email communication is not permitted other than to set up a face-to-face or phone meeting.
Henny
Mar 23, 2018Mar 23 at 7:58pm
Andrea, I think it is important to go to the meeting with the intent of presenting a well prepared and evidence based policy recommendation based on being a RN and a community member. Being a student is secondary to this and it is important to go with the idea that you are actually helping her rather than the other way around. Yes, you are doing this for a school assignment but that doesn’t change the fact that you are an experienced RN with a lot to offer
Edited by Henny Breen on Mar 23 at 8:07pm
Mar 25, 2018Mar 25 at 9:10pm
Henny,
I was planning on my initial interaction with her being via email. I feel like this gives her an introduction of what I would like to discuss so she is not blind-sided. I do however, feel that to get my points across more a face to face or even phone interaction would be best. In email the personal touch can be lost, and it can often be difficult to decide what is meant by certain comments.
I think your point about me actually helping her instead of the other way around is interesting and a side I had not looked at prior to now. That does make a lot of sense. As a state representative she does technically work on behalf of the people, so it is only fair to us that we have the ability to share our thoughts and concerns with her. And, as Philip mentioned, talking to her may impact may way of voting depending on her views for my topic.
Mar 18, 2018Mar 18 at 9:29pm
Communicating with Legislators
Before approaching a policymaker, it is wise to know the background of the person you will be interviewing (Kachel, 2014). You should know what their stance is on the issues you will be discussing (Kachel, 2014). Since my husband works in the Jacksonville North Pulaski School District, I have been able to ask both him and his coworkers about Daniel Gray, the President of the Jacksonville North Pulaski School Board. Mr. Gray is involved in the district’s athletic department, so I feel children and physical activity are important to him. I surmised he would be a good person to speak with since he shares a similar interest in children’s health. By knowing your subject’s background, you will know the best way to explain your policy that will peak interest in your audience (Kachel, 2014). It is important when speaking about your policy that you can show some personal connection to the issue (Kachel, 2014). By showing how this issue affects you, the policymaker will be able to understand your passion and realize the importance of the issue (Kachel, 2014). On the other hand, if someone is presenting a policy and acts as if they have no investment in the issue or could basically care less, why would the policy maker care? Working in an orthopedic unit has allowed me to see what long-term effects childhood obesity can have on adults. Eating habits and physical activity are created as children. If schools implement avenues to address the obesity issue, they can prevent many people from developing medical conditions and even an early death. I feel my current jobsite then provides me with topics I can personally discuss with Mr. Gray. Like any conversation, presenting a policy is going to come across best if it can be done in person (Kachel, 2014); this approach adds a face to the issue. Discussions done by electronic communication can sometimes cause information to get lost in translation or come across differently than the presenter is intending. I plan to contact Mr. Gray via email to
set up a meeting time that is convenient for him. Ideally, I would like to be able to speak with him in person, but a phone call might be the only option. Before the initial meeting, it is helpful to send information on the topic you will be presenting (Kachel, 2014). This step will enable your policy maker to list questions and concerns for the discussion. Sending information before the meeting provides time for the other person to perform his own research on the issue. Likewise, being prepared for the presentation hopefully demonstrates the importance of your issue to your policy maker; it emphasizes the need for supporting your viewpoint. Researching the background on the issue is the first step. To hit a homerun, you must convey the importance of the problem by being well prepared for your presentation.
References NR 506 Week 4 DQ Challenges in Lobbying Strategies
KACHEL, D. E. (2014). Communicating with Legislators. School Library Monthly, 30(5), 8-10.
NR 506 Week 4 DQ Challenges in Lobbying Strategies Grading Rubric Guidelines
Performance Category | 10 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 0 |
Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions. |
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Category | 10 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 0 |
Application of Course Knowledge –
Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Category | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
Interactive Dialogue
Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days. (5 points possible per graded thread) |
|
Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. |
|
|
|
Minus 1 Point | Minus 2 Point | Minus 3 Point | Minus 4 Point | Minus 5 Point | |
Grammar, Syntax, APA
Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted. Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition |
|
|
|
|
|
0 points lost | -5 points lost | ||||
Total Participation Requirements
per discussion thread |
The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. | The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days | |||
Early Participation Requirement
per discussion thread |
The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. | The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT. |