NR 501 Week 5 Borrowed (non-nursing) Theories Applied to the Nursing Profession

NR 501 Week 5 Borrowed (non-nursing) Theories Applied to the Nursing Profession

Sample Answer for NR 501 Week 5 Borrowed (non-nursing) Theories Applied to the Nursing Profession Included After Question

NR 501 Week 5 Borrowed (non-nursing) Theories Applied to the Nursing Profession

While the focus of this course is nursing theory, frequently the use of non-nursing or borrowed theories occurs.  Select a nursing practice area (i.e. education, executive, advance clinical practice, informatics, and health care policy); then identify a non-nursing (borrowed) theory; and apply it to the area you have selected.  Be sure to provide an example of how the non-nursing theory can be used to enhance the selected practice area.  Don’t forget to include scholarly reference(s) to support your information.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 501 Week 5 Borrowed (non-nursing) Theories Applied to the Nursing Profession

Title: NR 501 Week 5 Borrowed (non-nursing) Theories Applied to the Nursing Profession

  • For this post, I am going to choose the specialty track that I am currently in: the educator track. A non-nursing (borrowed) theory I think that applies to my specific area is the discipline-specific theory. This theory is defined as an organized knowledge that is unique to its own specific discipline. Knowledge that is considered owned can have significance to the knowledge and discipline that is shared throughout our profession. This makes me think of things such as providing answers to questions, solutions to problems, or explaining nursing content. This theory is designed to identify the knowledge that is specific to a certain branch of learning, which in this field would be nursing. Its purpose is to provide a database that is related to nursing care and is designed to improve and promote the health and well-beings of the patients under my nursing students care (Cordon, 2013).

We as nurses must have a discipline-specific determination to provide high quality nursing care. We must establish a framework specifically designed to the nursing profession. We are legally and morally responsible for our patients, but for some reason, the meaning of “high quality care” remains unclear mainly because the models we have used to define are borrowed from other disciplines. Patient outcomes are products of our service. They are specific to our patient’s own perspective and are actions and behaviors are linked to our discipline-specific determination and knowledge (Gunther et al., 2012).

NR 501 Week 5 Borrowed (non-nursing) Theories Applied to the Nursing Profession
NR 501 Week 5 Borrowed (non-nursing) Theories Applied to the Nursing Profession

NR 501 Week 5 Borrowed (non-nursing) Theories Applied to the Nursing Profession References:

Gunther, M., & Alligood, M. R. (2012). A discipline-specific determination of high quality nursing care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 38(4), 353-359. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02201.x

Cordon, C. P. (2013). System theories: An overview of various system theories and its application in healthcare. American Journal of Systems Science, 2(1), 13-22.
DOI: 10.5923/j.ajss.20130201.03

Collapse SubdiscussionBrenda Talley

 

Brenda Talley

Jan 29, 2018Jan 29 at 10:19am

Manage Discussion Entry

Hailey, you brought to light an very important idea.  Gunther and Alligood (2012) believe that the profession of nursing should develop a theory of high quality care that is specific to nursing, that is, a theory that falls under the umbrella/catagory of being a discipline specific theory–in this case, nursing.

One way to do this is to look at other disciplines for their contributions to the understating of this concept and learn from those.  Class, what theories might help us move along with this understanding?

Haily, you also introduced systems theory into the discussion.  Some nursing theories have been influenced by systems theory, the most obvious being Betty Neuman’s systems theory that was adapted specifically for nursing.  General systems theory (GST) was introduced by von Bertalanffy (1968), a biologist, in the early 20th century.

Hailey and class, as you look at the elements of  GST, can you see correlations between the principles of GST and those of nursing theories.  For example, are our views of holism compatible with how the “whole” is seen in GST?

NR 501 Week 5 Borrowed (non-nursing) Theories Applied to the Nursing Profession  References

Gunther, M., & Alligood, M. R. (2012). A discipline-specific determination of high quality nursing care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 38(4), 353-359. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02201.x

von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General System Theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller.

Professor Talley,

To answer your question in-depth, I first did a little research on the General Systems Theory. This theory is utilized more as an approach, per say, rather than a theory. This approach is used in our profession as a new way of seeing the profession and understanding it. This theory actually goes hand and hand with the development of physical sciences and the rise of both conflict and peace. GST is a characteristic of groups and systems combining together as one, or as we see a whole (Rousseau, 2016).

With this being said, GST is a “wholeness” in the nursing profession. I can see a correlation between GST and nursing theories due to this very fact. There are correlations between GST and nursing theory because the two tend to integrate with various sciences. GST also is the “center theory” in all of our nursing theories. GST and nursing theories are important aspects in the physical fields of science and the nonphysical fields of science (Rousseau, 2016).

I also think that GST as a whole develops principles throughout all nursing theories and in turn brings us closer to a unity of science which leads us to an integration of education in the science and nursing profession. GST appears holistic in nursing theory and we must think of it as a system of mutual interaction (Rousseau, 2016).

I found this theory to be interesting in our profession because Ludwig found that the study of systems can contain a cross-sectional approach or a developmental approach. A cross-sectional approach deals with the mutual interactions between two or more systems (or in this case, nursing theories) and a developmental approach deals with changes that occur over time. Nursing theories too use these approaches and look at nursing as a profession and a structure that can be changed overtime (Rousseau, 2016).

NR 501 Week 5 Borrowed (non-nursing) Theories Applied to the Nursing Profession Reference:

Rousseau, D., Billingham, J., Wilby, J., & Blachfellner, S. (2016). The Synergy between General Systems Theory and the General Systems Worldview. Systema Journal, 4(1). Retrieved January 30, 2018.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NR 501 Week 5 Borrowed (non-nursing) Theories Applied to the Nursing Profession

 

NR 501 Week 5 Borrowed (non-nursing) Theories Applied to the Nursing Profession Grading Rubric

Performance Category 100% or highest level of performance

100%

16 points

Very good or high level of performance

88%

14 points

Acceptable level of performance

81%

13 points

Inadequate demonstration of expectations

68%

11 points

Deficient level of performance

56%

9 points

 

Failing level

of performance

55% or less

0 points

 Total Points Possible= 50           16 Points    14 Points 13 Points        11 Points           9 Points          0 Points
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
 16 Points  14 Points  13 Points 11 Points 9 Points  0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge

Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
   10 Points 9 Points  6 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue

Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)

The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)

Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.

Demonstrated all of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 3 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 2 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
  8 Points 7 Points  6 Points         5 Points          4 Points  0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.

The following was present:

  • 0-3 errors in APA format

AND

  • Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND

  • Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.
The following was present:

  • 4-6 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.
The following was present:

  • 7-9 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.
 

The following was present:

  • 10- 12 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.
 

The following was present:

  • 13 – 15 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.

AND/OR

  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.
The following was present:

  • 16 to greater errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style does not facilitate communication
  0 Points Deducted 5 Points Lost
Participation

Requirements

Demonstrated the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
Failed to demonstrate the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
  0 Points Lost 5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements Demonstrated all of the following:

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Demonstrates one or less of the following.

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.