Sample Answer for NR 500 Week 8: What Did You Learn Included After Question
NR 500 Week 8: What Did You Learn
NR 500 Week 8: What Did You Learn
Throughout this course, I have gained immense knowledge on advanced practice nursing (APN) roles, person-centered care (PCC), and systems theory and practice issues. One of the important things I learned is that APNs have a crucial role in promoting the best possible health outcomes for the patient populations and communities they serve (Heinen et al., 2019). Secondly, I learned that providing PCC involves evaluating a patient’s abilities and potential to manage and improve their health instead of viewing the patient as a recipient of passive treatment. Therefore, providers should seek to develop patient treatment plans based on the health needs of an individual patient (Santana et al., 2018). Thirdly, I learned that healthcare ethical issues create dilemmas challenging nursing practice globally. The ethical issues occur when providing direct patient care causing ethical dilemmas, which APNs need to find solutions in their practice.
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 500 Week 8: What Did You Learn
Title: NR 500 Week 8: What Did You Learn
The information learned in the course will be applied in my future APN practice to deliver high-quality care and address common
issues. For instance, I will make use of care interventions such as evidence-based treatment interventions and interprofessional collaboration to better patient health outcomes. I will apply knowledge on person-centered care to collaboratively set patient care goals and interventions with patients to meet their health needs (Santana et al., 2018). Furthermore, I will apply knowledge on ethical issues to create an ethical framework that will guide me in scenarios requiring complex ethical decision-making.
Steps that will promote success in the master’s program will include establishing positive relationships with my professors and supervisor. In addition, I will join an MSN student organization to get support and access resources that will foster my success. Lastly, I will be attending scientific nursing conferences since they will expose me to new APN practice interventions and build my professional connections.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 500 Week 8: What Did You Learn
NR 500 Week 8: What Did You Learn References
Heinen, M., van Oostveen, C., Peters, J., Vermeulen, H., & Huis, A. (2019). An integrative review of leadership competencies and attributes in advanced nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(11), 2378–2392. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14092
Santana, M. J., Manalili, K., Jolley, R. J., Zelinsky, S., Quan, H., & Lu, M. (2018). How to practice person-centred care: A conceptual framework. Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 21(2), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12640.
Requirements:
Discussion Criteria
Application of Course Knowledge: The student post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from the healthcare field. The student must accurately and fully discuss the topic for the week in addition to providing personal or professional The student must completely answer the entire initial question.
Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue: The student responds to a student peer OR course faculty to further dialogue.
Peer or Faculty Response: The student responds substantively to at least one topic-related post by a student A substantive post adds content or insights or asks a question that will add to the learning experience and/or generate discussion.
A post of “I agree†with a repeat of the other student’s post does not count as a substantive A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.
The peer response must occur before Saturday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
The peer response does not require a scholarly citation and reference unless the information is paraphrased and/or direct quotes are used, in which APA style standards then apply.
Integration of Evidence: The student post provides support from a minimum of two in-text citations with matching references. Sources may be course lessons, assigned readings, or outside scholarly sources.
Professionalism in Communication: The post presents information in logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence, and is clearly relevant to the discussion topic. Grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate.
Wednesday Participation Requirement: The student provides a substantive response to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course faculty (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.
Total Participation Requirement: The student provides at least two substantive posts (one to the initial question or topic, one to a student peer or a faculty question) on two separate days during the week.