NR 447 Week 2 Discussion AACN Essentials Self Assessment and Patient Centered Care

AACN Essentials Self-Assessment and Patient-Centered Care

Locate and complete the Self-Assessment of the AACN Essentials located in Doc Sharing (Week 2). Follow the directions on the form. Note your total score. Next, review the article cited below:
Kramer, M., Schmalenberg, C., Maguire, P., Brewer, B., Burke, R., Chmielewski, L., … Meeks-Sjostrom, D. (2009). Walk the talk: Promoting control of nursing practice and a patient-centered culture. Critical Care Nurse, 29(3), 77–93. Click to link.
Answer the following:
If you are willing, please share your total score on the AACN Essentials Self-Assessment
Candidly identify and share with your classmates areas where knowledge, skills or abilities (KSAs) are lacking?
Describe the relationship between the Essentials and your new-found knowledge about Patient Centered Care. Are there opportunities for your improvement?

Patient-Centered Care

Person-centered care means treating a patient as a person and an equal partner in their healing journey and focusing care on their health needs. I believe person-centered care strategies should be individualized, harmonized, and enable patients to reach their full potential. Therefore, the nurse or healthcare professional providing person-centered care should consider the patient’s needs, values, and preferences when making clinical decisions, which fosters respectful care. Kwame & Petrucka (2021) assert that the healthcare provider must consider a patient’s previous healthcare experiences and knowledge and, thus, provide care that focuses on and respects their values, preferences, and needs by increasingly involving the patient in the care process.

A nurse practitioner should first evaluate the patient’s abilities to manage and improve their health and collaboratively identify strategies that will help the patient in these abilities (Kwame & Petrucka, 2021). I believe that a fundamental aspect of patient-centered care is delivering services that respect and meet patients’ needs. This fosters positive healthcare outcomes, improves patients’ perceptions of quality of care, and improves patient satisfaction with care.

Holistic nursing means a comprehensive approach to patient care. It entails treating the whole person by also considering their mental and social factors instead of just focusing on managing the symptoms of their diagnosis. I perceive holistic care as a nursing approach that addresses a patient’s physical, psychological, social, and spiritual needs. Thus, this type of care is comprehensive. Instead of treating the diagnosis, holistic nursing seeks to improve the individual patient’s overall well-being and quality of life (Papathanasiou et al., 2013). Furthermore, I believe holistic nursing is relationship-centered care that should be individualized, with the primary goal being optimal health. Therefore, the NP practicing holistic nursing should acknowledge the patient’s body, mind, and spirit by treating the entire individual instead of one symptom (Papathanasiou et al., 2013). Besides, the NP should acknowledge that various factors affect a person’s health, including dietary habits and environmental influences. Consequently, they should ask patients questions about their general lifestyle.

Cultural humility refers to being respectful and empathetic and applying critical self-reflection at intrapersonal and interpersonal levels. Hughes et al. (2020) explain that the intrapersonal element of cultural humility entails being aware of one’s limited ability to appreciate the patient’s worldview and culture. On the other hand, the interpersonal component integrates an opinion toward a patient characterized by respect and openness to the patient’s point of view. It also focuses on learning from the patient by listening and building partnerships (Hughes et al., 2020). I believe that a nurse with cultural humility should have a mindset that enables them to be open to patients’ preferences by demonstrating respect and empathy. Furthermore, if nurses combine cultural humility with critical conversation skills, they can get an opportunity to discuss cultural misunderstandings, intercultural pain, and how to develop a cultural understanding.

NR 447 Week 2 Discussion AACN Essentials Self Assessment and Patient Centered Care References

Hughes, V., Delva, S., Nkimbeng, M., Spaulding, E., Turkson-Ocran, R. A., Cudjoe, J., … & Han, H. R. (2020). Not missing the opportunity: Strategies to promote cultural humility among future nursing faculty. Journal of Professional Nursing, 36(1), 28-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2019.06.005

Kwame, A., & Petrucka, P. M. (2021). A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient interactions: barriers, facilitators, and the way forward. BMC Nursing, 20(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00684-2

Papathanasiou, I., Sklavou, M., &Kourkouta, L. (2013). Holistic nursing care: Theories and perspectives. American Journal of Nursing Science, 2(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20130201.11

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 447 Week 2 Discussion AACN Essentials Self Assessment and Patient Centered Care

NR 447 Week 2 Discussion AACN Essentials Self Assessment and Patient Centered Care Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable	No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions. Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Application of Course Knowledge – Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources; Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources. Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content	Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson. Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson	Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post. Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life	Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category	5	4	3	2	0
Interactive Dialogue Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days. *(5 points possible per graded thread)*	Exceeds minimum post requirements Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days. Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days Replies to a question posed by a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days. The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty	Has only one post for the week Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments	Does not post to the thread No connections are made to the topic
	Minus 1 Point	Minus 2 Point	Minus 3 Point	Minus 4 Point	Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted. Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition	2-3 errors in APA format. Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors. Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.	4-5 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is somewhat focused.	6-7 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.	8-10 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.	Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format. Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style does not facilitate communication. The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
	0 points lost				-5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements *per discussion thread*	The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.				The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement *per discussion thread*	The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.				The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

Also Read: NR 447 Week 1 Discussion The Affordable Care Act