NR 439 Week 6: Research Article Critique Paper (graded)
Sample Answer for NR 439 Week 6: Research Article Critique Paper (graded) Included After Question
Research Article Critique Guidelines
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is for the student to learn to examine, analyze, critique, and summarize an original research article. Student is to select an article from the Research Article Critique List of Articles (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Open the link to find a choice of articles from which you must choose ONE to complete this assignment.
Course Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to meet the following course outcomes:
CO1: Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO7)
CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 and 8)
CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (POs 4 and 8)
CO5: Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice. (POs 7 and 8)
Points
The assignment is worth a total of 175 points.
Rubric
Click to view and download the NR439 Research Article Critique Paper Rubric (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
Due Date
You are to submit your paper by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6.
Requirements
Through this assignment, the student will:
- Critique a peer-reviewed study, and in your own words, describe the research question, sample, design of study, data collection method, findings, and limitations of each. (CO 1, CO2,)
- Summarize the research article and evaluate the significance to nursing. Do not just quote the author’s words. Paraphrase the information. (CO 4, CO5).
Guidelines to writing the Paper
- Tips on how to complete this assignment may be found at http://www.brainshark.com/devry/vu?pi=zFmz5THHgzHr05z0&intk=406182077 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
- Download the Research Article Critique List of Articles (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. and select ONE to analyze.
- Retrieve the full-text version of the article from the library. Read it thoroughly.
- Introduction (one paragraph): The introduction should be interesting and capture the reader’s attention.
- Provide a brief description of the research article to be discussed.
- Discuss the purpose of your paper. The purpose statement of the paper should relate to the research article reviewed and the implications that it has to evidence based nursing practice.
- You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
- Describe the research question for this study in a paragraph.
- Describe the research in greater detail.
- Include your observations about this question.
- Discuss events or trends that could have affected this question.
- You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
- Describe the research design of this study, and in your own words discuss the design.
- Discuss the research design of the study.
- Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the type of design and hypothesize why the author utilized the design as opposed to others.
- You will need to summarize the information from the article in your own words
- Describe the sample.
- Briefly describe the sample size used for this study
- Make a judgment as to whether the sample size was adequate and defend your answer.
- Describe the number or participants and determine if the number of participants was adequate compared to the research question and the intent of the study.
- Are these numbers adequate? Discuss gaps in that you identified.
- You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
- Describe the data collection method(s)’
- Who collected the data?
- What tools were used?
- What were the ethical considerations addressed and discuss gaps you identified.
- You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
- Describe the limitations of the study.
- Identify the limitations within the study
- Describe how the limitations could be overcome in subsequent studies
- Comment on why limitations are important to list and discuss within a study
- You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
- Describe the findings reported in the study.
- Describe the findings reported in the study
- Discuss whether the findings of the study answered the research question posed within the study
- Discuss the credibility of the findings
- If the findings do not support the research question posed within the study, what do you believe is the reason?
- You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words
- Summary
- Summarize important points from the body of your paper including the key components of the paper.
- Include a statement about the research question and the findings.
- Discuss the probability of implementation into practice. Based on these findings, is the evidence that you found on your topic strong enough to suggest a change in practice, or an idea for practice?
- End with a concluding statement.
- Citations and References must be included to support the information within each topic area. Refer to the APA manual, Chapter 7, for examples of proper reference format. In-text citations are to be noted for all information contained in your paper that is not your original idea or thought. Ask yourself, “How do I know this?” and then cite the source.
- Reference Page: The Reference Page should start on a new page (insert a page break). All references should be cited within the body of the paper as (Author, year) and the full reference should be included in APA format on the reference page. A url link alone is not an adequate reference. See the APA Guidelines in Course Resources for examples of properly formatted references.
- Submit the completed paper by 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday at the end of Week 6.
**Academic Integrity Reminder**
Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.
By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.
Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.
NOTE: Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page.
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 439 Week 6: Research Article Critique Paper (graded)
Title: NR 439 Week 6: Research Article Critique Paper (graded)
Rubric
NR439_Research_Article_Critique
| NR439_Research_Article_Critique | |||||||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Question
Describe, analyze, and summarize the research question for this study your own words. |
|
20.0 pts | |||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDesign of Study
Describe, analyze, and summarize the research design of this study in your own words. |
|
20.0 pts | |||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSample/Population of the Study
Describe, analyze, and summarize the sample in your own words. |
|
25.0 pts | |||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Collection Methods
Describe, analyze, and summarize the data collection method(s)’ in your own words. |
|
25.0 pts | |||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations
Describe, analyze, and summarize the limitations of the study in your own words. |
|
20.0 pts | |||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFindings
Describe, analyze, and summarize the findings reported in the study in your own words. |
|
20.0 pts | |||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of Article
Summarize important points from the body of your paper including the key components of the paper and discuss the probability of implementation into practice. |
|
25.0 pts | |||||
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Punctuation, and Spelling/ APA Formatting
No more than 0–3 errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. APA formatting is correct with 0–3 errors. |
|
20.0 pts | |||||
| Total Points: 175.0 | |||||||
Research Article Critique
Fride Edith Wandji
NR439
August 12, 2017
Research Article Critique
Introduction
An article was written by Allen, Murfet and Hingston (2014) giving detailed account of new nurse led care model for pregnant women who suffer from diabetes. This paper is a research based evaluation of that article only. Diabetes in Pregnancy (DIP) is a common occurrence and the cases of it have increased in the past decade that has led to development of measures to counter this issue. There are two major reasons that have led to increase in cases of DIP; first as asserted by Thompson and Masso women who live in areas that don’t have access to specialist doctors suffer from this issue and second those women who aren’t that well informed about management of diabetes. This paper is an attempt to present an in-depth analysis of a method suggested for the management of diabetes among pregnant women.
Research Question
Rural setting in this context applies to those areas that don’t have enough number of medical specialists and this study is an attempt to determine that can the situations be improved by applying a nurse practitioner model in such settings, which is the research question of this study.
The expectant mother isn’t the only one who is effected due to DIP as the unborn child inside her womb also suffers from healthcare fatalities as suggested by various cases. Those children are known to suffer from Jaundice, growth retardation, Thrombosis and macrosomia. This makes it all the more essential to consider this issue seriously and devise a solution for overcoming it so that not just the mother but also the unborn child could live a healthy life. This is one such topic that needs to be researched further considering the seriousness of the situation (Murfet, Allen, and Hingston, 2014)
Design of the Study
Uncontrolled before-after intervention design of study has been used in for this study which involves comparison of results prior to the implementation of intervention and after its implementation. The results of sample population are compared with that of a controlled group as denoted by the term uncontrolled where information related to management of DIP is collected before and after the implementation of the intervention program.
Since the sample population that is used for this process comprises of individuals who are from rural areas therefore this design of study is the most suited one. Control groups cannot be used in these settings as it would lead to biasness in results along with other factors that can affect the results. There’s a distinct disadvantage of not using control groups that it becomes difficult to reach at conclusions and the design of the study also doesn’t allow to achieve desired results.
The results along with benefits of treatment could have been overestimated if a controlled group would have been used for this study instead of an uncontrolled group. Correct design of study needs to be implemented because otherwise the results would be wrong leading to misleading suggestions as asserted by Goodacre (2015). It is essential to follow correct design because the conclusions that would be made otherwise would not be right. Although clinical practices cannot be based on the results of this study performed on an uncontrolled group due to lack of basis related to medical actions.
Maximum usage of resources that was found in the local environment was assured by making use of DIPC models. General practitioners weren’t tasked with the responsibility of monitoring the women as it was allotted to CDEs. The success of this design is fundamentally dependent on the support that is available via this model and the information provision.
The women who can suffer from the issue of diabetes can be identified due to this design of study as it makes use of the ICD criteria. This was a major positive of using this study design along with ensuring that there wasn’t any sort of biasness anywhere in the whole process as the searching process was done based on codes that were collected from the ICDs in antenatal clinics. This ensured total clarity in the process (Goodacre, 2015)
Sample/ Population of the Study
All the pregnant women from the North West of Tasmania who suffered from the health complication of diabetes from July 2003 to June 2006 were included as sample population for the pre-intervention audit. Several parameters were set to include women as sample population for this study like the women needs to be pregnant and suffering from diabetes and at the time of study she should be getting treated at a government or private hospital for that.
Next parameter was that the women who was diagnosed with GDM during the duration of this study at the same healthcare would be included for this study as sample population and the need for pre-intervention audit solidified the requirement of International Classification of Diagnosis ease codes (ICD). There were a total of 261 participants in this study and out of them 37 of them were diagnosed with diabetes and 26 out of that had type 1 diabetes while eleven had type 2. Along with that among the participants of the study 195 women suffered from gestational diabetes along with referrals from physicians also being there.
Due to the fact that the sample population only includes women who are pregnant and suffer from diabetes, the process of selecting sample population becomes feasible for the population. This selection process makes it easier to study the effect that the nurse practitioner led model would have on nursing women who are pregnant and suffer from diabetes (Murfet, Allen, and Hingston, 2014)
Data Collection Methods
Credentialed Diabetes Educators (CDEs) are the ones who are tasked with the responsibility of recording data about pregnant women who accesses maternity service records for that. He accesses those records and then marks that data onto data collection audit registering sheet including cases of those women also who suffer from diabetes and are suspected to be pregnant. The correctness of the entries in the form along with completeness of it is ensured by the lead DNP who only references some part of the form to keep a check on the work of CDE that whether he is doing his job efficiently or not.
CDEs record variety of information related to women on the form like the monitoring that has been done related to diabetes on them, specific GDM screening they have gained, demographics, treatment process for diabetes during pregnancy along with maternal results observed in that process. Local experts like diabetes nurse educator and diabetes physicians are the ones who check the validity of the contents of the form.
The best practices that are available in the current medical scenario and the ones that are suggested based on the information presented in the form are compared by a panel who reviews the findings of the form and an endocrinologist who validates it. Height and weight of pregnant women isn’t regularly measured and that’s why for the pre-intervention group the Body Mass index wasn’t available. Australian Bureau of Statistics was referenced for collecting information related to social and economic status of individuals who participated in the study.
Data collection is also done via the audit forms that are kept in healthcare facilities for women who are pregnant and visit the hospital. Along with that information is also collected from database that is originally stored there by the application of International Classification of Disease Codes.
Several ethical considerations are followed in the process of collecting data to keep the process on line. The research material was approved by Patient Care Committee of the Quality and Safety Executive Unite at the North West Regional Hospital and the Executive Board of the North West Private Hospital was also invited by the management of the hospital to participate in the Research Ethics committee (Murfet, Allen, and Hingston, 2014). The identity of patient is kept hidden at any cost and that’s why no information related to identity of patient is recorded at any stage of the study like the name or address of the patient. At no point is this study was any such information recorded by the researchers that could give up the identity of the participant women of this study.
Limitations
There are several limitations of this study that need to be worked upon in order to provide better level of care to pregnant women who suffer from diabetes in times to come. They would be able to treat such women better if such situations are taken care of now. Since the height and weight of pregnant women isn’t recorded every time they visit hospital therefore Body Mass Index (BMI) for the pre-intervention group isn’t available. BMI is