NR 506 Week 3 Discussion:

NR 439 Week 1 DiscussionRole of Research and the Importance of the Searchable Clinical Question

NR 439 Week 1 Discussion Role of Research and the Importance of the Searchable Clinical Question

NR 439 Week 1 DiscussionRole of Research and the Importance of the Searchable Clinical Question

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 439 Week 1 DiscussionRole of Research and the Importance of the Searchable Clinical Question

According to CCN 2017 week 1 lesson, evidence can form the basis of best practices for the nursing process (assessment, diagnosis, planning, implantation and evaluation). As we consider the who, what, where, when, why and how of the situation, we begin to formulate a clinical question that addresses these queries. The PICOT format is a way to develop a clinical question that leads itself to searching for evidence. PICOT is an acronym for:

P= Population of interest

I= Intervention of interest

C= Comparison of interest

O= Outcome of interest

T Time

The case study of a 57 year old female with a 13 year history of diabetes who presented to the hospital due to failure of oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) in controlling her sugar levels, for the last 3 years, and was using biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 for treatment. She is a regular swimmer and socially very active, which led to her to have irregular meals and so often goes into frequent hypoglycemia. Her lifestyle, eating habits, and the use of biphasic insulin are the contributing factors of her uncontrolled diabetes and hypoglycemia. In addressing this case study, I will formulate the PICOT as follows:

P= 57 year old female with 13 years history of diabetes

I=Teaching regarding diabetic management

C=No teaching regarding diabetic management

O=Improvement in diabetic management and reduction of diabetic crisis

T=Daily monitoring of fasting blood-sugar and postprandial blood-sugar levels x 3 months and monitoring HA1C levels every 3 months. Assessment of knowledge about diabetic management.

 

Clinical question after PICOT format:

  1. Etiology and assessment: Does lifestyle (irregular meals )and biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 causes hypoglycemia on the female.

Treatment and Prognosis: With lifestyle modification(regular meals), teaching on diabetic management and insulin degludec help in controlling the ladies diabetes by maintaining her blood-sugar levels and HA1C within normal limits?

 

NR 439 Week 1 DiscussionRole of Research and the Importance of the Searchable Clinical Question References

CCN (2017). Week 1 Lesson. NR-439 RN Evidence-Based Practice. Online lesson. Downers Grove, IL: DeVry Education. Group.CCN (2016).

Role of Research and the Importance of the Searchable Clinical Question
Research is a fundamental role that every nurses plays but in different ways. How do you fulfill the research role now? What trends have created a push for nursing practice based on evidence?
As you contemplate your role in the research process, read the assigned Week 1 Case Study and formulate one searchable, clinical question in the PICO (T) format. There are several potential questions that could be asked. Identify if the focus of your question is assessment, etiology, treatment, or prognosis. Remember to integrate references

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 439 Week 1 DiscussionRole of Research and the Importance of the Searchable Clinical Question

NR 439 Week 1 DiscussionRole of Research and the Importance of the Searchable Clinical Question
NR 439 Week 1 DiscussionRole of Research and the Importance of the Searchable Clinical Question

Class, you may begin posting in this TD on Sunday, July 2nd for credit.
Class, this week begins your journey into evidence-based practice or EBP.

Along the way, you’ll explore nursing research and its evolution from Florence Nightingale’s time until today.

You’ll build on knowledge gained in the informatics course as you choose a significant clinical issue, formulate a searchable clinical question, and search for research-based evidence.
This process lays the groundwork for a PICOT assignment that you’ll complete during the course as you discover sources of evidence for your own EBP. Nursing research critically advances our profession through the development of evidence upon which our practice standards are based. To determine what the best evidence is, a nurse needs to look at how the information was collected, how rigorous the methods used to develop the evidence was, and what source was used to share the evidence.

The Course Outcomes (CO) we will apply in our first week include:

Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice.
Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice.

Read the assigned case study and formulate searchable, clinical questions in the PICO(T) format. There are several potential questions that could be asked. Identify if the focus of your question is assessment, etiology, treatment, or prognosis. Remember to integrate references.

There are many possibilities for the research question. Make sure that you also Identify the focus of each question and explain WHY.  Don’t forget to give the “P”, “I”, “C”, “O” AND T
You may want to review the lesson from Week

Charles a common method for nursing to use when searching for evidence to improve practice with the goal of asking a searchable and answerable question is to use a PICOT question format.  Placing the clinical, searchable problem question in PICO(T) format helps to clarify the population, intervention, comparison or variables, outcome, and time frame involved (Chamberlain College of Nursing, 2018).  You have written a very well defined PICOT for this case study. Good work. What words would you use for searching for information in the library on your topic?  Dr Joy

Chamberlain College of Nursing (2017). NR-439 RN Evidence-Based Practice: Week 1 lesson. Downers Grove, IL: Online Publication.

Class, you may begin posting in this TD on Sunday, July 2nd for credit.
Class, this week begins your journey into evidence-based practice or EBP.

Along the way, you’ll explore nursing research and its evolution from Florence Nightingale’s time until today.

You’ll build on knowledge gained in the informatics course as you choose a significant clinical issue, formulate a searchable clinical question, and search for research-based evidence.
This process lays the groundwork for a PICOT assignment that you’ll complete during the course as you discover sources of evidence for your own EBP. Nursing research critically advances our profession through the development of evidence upon which our practice standards are based. To determine what the best evidence is, a nurse needs to look at how the information was collected, how rigorous the methods used to develop the evidence was, and what source was used to share the evidence.

The Course Outcomes (CO) we will apply in our first week include:

Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice.
Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice.

Read the assigned case study and formulate searchable, clinical questions in the PICO(T) format. There are several potential questions that could be asked. Identify if the focus of your question is assessment, etiology, treatment, or prognosis. Remember to integrate references.

There are many possibilities for the research question. Make sure that you also Identify the focus of each question and explain WHY.  Don’t forget to give the “P”, “I”, “C”, “O” AND T
You may want to review the lesson from Week One.   Dr Joy

NR 439 Week 1 DiscussionRole of Research and the Importance of the Searchable Clinical Question  Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

Also Read: NR 392 Week 8 Discussion Reflection on AACN BSN Essential II