NR 392 Week 4 Discussion Quality Improvement Data
Sample Answer for NR 392 Week 4 Discussion Quality Improvement Data Included After Question
Quality Improvement Data
Purpose
This week’s graded topics relate to the following Course Outcome (CO).
CO2: Discuss effective processes and strategies to improve quality in nursing. (POs 2 and 8)
The Assignment
Consider the following questions:
How does your current or former clinical environment share data collected on quality measures or initiatives with the staff?
What further data would you like to have shared and why?
Lopes Write Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 392 Week 4 Discussion Quality Improvement Data
Title: NR 392 Week 4 Discussion Quality Improvement Data
Data Analysis and Quality Improvement Initiative Proposal
Quality improvement is the process followed to analyze the performance of an organization as well as efforts to improve performance (Dixon-Woods & Martin, 2016). Quality improvement programs are important because they result in improved outcomes for patients, enhanced staff efficiency and reduced waste linked to process failure. Hospitals handle lives and thus specific standards have to be met since even government and insurance reimbursement for patient care follows the health outcomes instead of procedures undertaken. Any quality improvement program should ensure that improvements are seen in areas like safety, effectiveness, access and patient-centeredness approach. The purpose of this paper is to analyze data from Washington Hospital to establish a health care issue or area of concern, come up with a quality initiative proposal following the established health issues and supporting data analysis, integrate inter-professional perspectives to optimize safety, cost-effectiveness and work-life quality and apply effective communication strategies to enhance inter-professional care.
Health Care Issue
Hospital Overview
Washington Hospital always strives to meet the Institute for Healthcare Improvement recommendations, which are improved patient experience, improved population health and reduced cost of health care. WH is a 341-bed, acute care hospital that offers full range of care services and advanced medical technology and it was among America’s 100 best hospitals. The ratings are obtained from data collated from various departments and some of the quality indicators used are 30-day readmission rates, pain control, fall rate, and discharge information. 30-day readmission rate is selected because it ensures that the hospital has an incentive to enhance care coordination and communication and caregivers and patients are involved in post-discharge planning. The rates are also used by CMS to penalize hospitals whose rates are beyond the national standard. Actually any hospital with a high readmissions rate gets a 3% deduction in their Medicare payment (Wasfy et al., 2017). The discharge planning helps in reducing readmissions rates and at the same time helps in enhancing patient satisfaction with nursing care. Discharge planning offers tech back and post-discharge care information to the patients which enhances trust and self-management. The fall rates are calculated to reduce serious complication likes intracranial bleeds and fractures and ensure that patient safety within the hospital is optimized.
Data Preview
The unit managers at Washington Hospital closely follow patient outcomes and quality indicators. The unit managers ensure that all the practitioners are updated on the progress during the monthly staff unit. The last report that was generated indicated a remarkable improvement in all the four indicators; 30-day readmission rates, pain control, falls and discharge information as outlined in table 1 below.
Table 1.
Washington Hospital Performance Report 2018-2019
| Year 30-day readmission rate (target) Discharge information (target) Pain control (target) Falls (target) |
| 2018 11.2 % (11.6%) 80.5% (90.6%) 60.1% (70.7%) 50 (0) |
| 2019 9.4% (9.4%) 85.3% (90.6%) 66.2% ( 70.7%) 40 (0) |
As indicated in Table 1 above, the hospital has seen a reduction in the 30-day readmission rates since in 2018 the rates were 11.2% while in 2019 they have reduced to 9.4% as per the current month of the year. The reduced rates can be linked to the increased percentage in the amount of discharge information offered which currently stands at 85.3 % from 80.5% in 2018. Pain management is also used as an indicator of patient satisfaction and better scores motivate patients to come back for other services ad refer their family and friends to the hospital. The hospital target is 70.7% and the current score is 66.2%. Although it is an improvement from the previous score of 60.1%, the hospital still has a long way to meet the set targets. Additionally, the hospital fall rates are below the set mark of zero rates since the falls experienced in 2018 were 50 while in 2019 they are 40.
Response to Data
Comparing the data generated in the two years, there is an improvement in pain control, discharge information, readmissions rates, and unassisted falls. Nevertheless, there is a need to come up with a quality initiative to ensure that the set targets are achieved. Using the information presented in the hospital performance report, all inpatient unit managers were requested to schedule meetings with nursing and auxiliary staff to analyze the reason why the set targets have not been achieved and come up with QI initiative that can enhance the outcomes. From the discussion, all nurses agreed that although there was an improvement in most of the indicators, the most affected part was the fall rates. The efforts already in place which is the use of call lights seem to stall the reduction process and the unit managers proposed that the quality initiative required should target the fall rates and ensure that the zero rate target set is achieved.
Quality Improvement Initiative Proposal
Intentional Rounding
There was an unanimous agreement that the quality initiative should help in handling fall rates. Patient fall rates are normally calculated using the number of fall events per 1000 patient days and the score indicates how a hospital maintains patient safety (Hicks, 2015). The initiative proposed was that the clinical nurse leader establishes an inter-professional team to implement a project that increases the day between patient fall events. The solution forwarded was enhancement of intentional rounding process and addressing the basic needs of the patients. The project is borrowed from the AHRQ guidelines that postulate that intentional rounding is effective when targeting to reduce patient falls within a hospital (AHRQ, 2019). Hourly rounding helps nurses address patient needs like personal belongings, pain, position, and toileting needs. Research also outlines that the use of intentional rounding minimizes the use of call lights among the patients, enhances patient satisfaction and reduces patient falls within the hospital setting (Jenko, Panjwani & Buck, 2019). Additionally, intentional rounding is defined as a structured approach where a nurse assesses patients at specific times to meet their fundamental needs. Intentional rounding follows six steps which are introducing oneself, expectations setting, questioning patient needs, using the 4 P’s which are positioning, placement, pain, and personal needs, offering the patient needs and documenting the care offered. Intentional rounding, therefore, offers patient-centered care which not only decreases patient risk evens but also enhances patient satisfaction.
Implementation Plan
To help in implementation, the project team established the root causes of fall events in the unit. The proactive risk assessment was used to establish the causes of falls within the hospital. The expected areas that may present as problematic are inconsistent intentional rounding, unreliable fall risk assessment, absence of an effective hand-off communication of high-risk patients and poor reports on falls data and event to frontline staff (Jenko, Panjwani & Buck, 2019). From the assessment, the team realized that the hospital had inconsistent intentional rounding.
The team then decided to use the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycle to test changes seen in the hospital. The changes were to be assessed by measuring the current state of the fall events, analyzing and discovering fall causes, coming up with targeted solutions and lastly sustaining and spreading improvements. The project team came up with a visual cue laminated poster aimed at reminding the patients to request for assistance before visiting the bathroom or standing up. A daily monitoring tool was set to help in capturing data on the usefulness of the poster and a falls prevention brochure created to educate patients and families about falls.
Standardizing Intentional Rounding
Although the AHRQ guidelines propose a multi-intervention approach, the hospital will adopt only two interventions, which are standardizing the intentional rounding and training patient and family on how to prevent falls (AHRQ, 2019). The project team expects that a standardized intentional rounding will reduce the fall rates to zero and it will handle toileting issues which are the major cause of the falls within the hospital. The unit leaders will have to also do their own rounding to assess how the nurses are communicating with patients and families on fall prevention. The unit leader will use a leader rounding tool to monitor the compliance levels of the unit staff.
Initiative Evaluation
The initiative will be analyzed by taking a baseline and current fall data obtained from the hospital quality database. Every fall event will be recorded and day between falls analyzed and then an analysis executed to monitor the changes in percentages of fall risk (Hicks, 2015). Every unit will have champions mainly a nurse and patient care technician who will be trained on how to fill the data collection form and execute the new work process. The nurse leader rounds will assist in assessing the staff competencies on patient rounding. The data obtained will then be analyzed by the project team and then a decision will be made on whether to maintain the project, make changes or plan another quality initiative.
Inter-professional Perspective
Prevention of hospital falls is crucial because they are linked to liabilities, delayed rehabilitation, increased patient length of stay and greater care costs (Jenko, Panjwani & Buck, 2019). To enhance the effectiveness of any quality initiative, there is a need to have inter-professional collaboration. Interprofessional collaboration offers clarity of professional roles and responsibilities, effective teamwork, common vision and coordination of action plans (Lasater et al., 2016). In the current initiative, the hospital aims at reducing fall rates through a standardized intentional rounding. Generally, falls prevention is left to nurses however it is a complex issue that should be approached using multiple perspectives.
Roles and Responsibilities
The proposed initiative will adopt an interprofessional perspective where the hospital administrators will be responsible for creating a safety culture and support the implementation of research-based clinical practice. The physician will help in conducting careful assessment of patient history, balance and mobility, peripheral nervous systems, cognition and medication review (Lasater et al., 2016). Physiotherapists, on the other hand, will test the function of the patients as well as the walking and balance abilities. The assessment will be used by the nurses to establish patient at greater risk of falls to ensure that rounding efforts are maximized around these patients. A selected nurse and patient care technician from each will collect the data that will be used for monitoring the project while the clinical nurse leader will lead the team and asses staff compliance to the project.
Use of High-Reliability Organization Model in the Intervention
To ensure that every member executes their roles as expected, training will be held and a monthly meeting set to address any setback found and reinforce the best practices. The project will also be handled using HRO model whose focus is safe reliable performance (Padgett et al., 2017). The project team will build expectations in their roles, routines, and strategies. The expectations will ensure that they follow an order and can predict the outcomes surrounding patient falls. The model also imparts mindfulness that will empower the team to manage unexpected events. The team will be able to establish early warning signs and thus will offer timely response towards unexpected events.
Work-Life Balance for the Team
The initiative expects to reduce the fall rates within the hospital. However, the effects expected are reduced length of stay, lesser readmissions and increased hospital safety (Khalifa, 2019).The reduced fall rates will enhance the work-life balance of the team because reduced readmissions and reduced length of stay mean that the emergency department will not be overcrowded. Beds will be available for patients and physicians will be able to offer quality care to their patients. research indicates that high numbers of patient increases chances of making errors thus number of errors will reduce in the hospital. Once the project achieves its objectives, the team will have an increased feeling of belonging to an efficient work community. The level of staff burnout will decrease which eventually will reduce staff turnover and enhance the overall productivity of the hospital (Khalifa, 2019).
Communication Strategies
Interprofessional communication occurs when team members communicate in a collaborative and responsible manner (Foronda, MacWilliams & McArthur, 2016). To enhance communication, good listening skills will be fostered as well as mutual respect for all team members. All members will be offered a chance to contribute and an environment where they feel comfortable to give constructive feedback will be created. Additionally, members will be expected to communicate clearly and offer sufficient information. Any information required will be presented in a timely manner and appropriate health care providers will be notified of the patient’s condition (Foronda, MacWilliams & McArthur, 2016). The members will be expected to be polite and respectful, respond to other team members and review notes from nurses and other health care professionals.
To ensure a standardized approach to communication, the Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (SBAR) tool will be used. Any message will be prepared using the SBAR framework and the messenger will ensure that the recipient of the message has understood the information. The tool will be used to communicate patient fall risk factors and suggest intervention, change in patient status, fall occurrence and environmental concerns (Reuben et al., 2017). The tool was selected because it outlines standardized prompt questions in four sections that ensure that information shared is focused and concise. It reduces the need for repetition reducing occurrence of errors and prompts team members to develop information using the right level of detail.
Conclusion
An analysis of Washington Hospital reveals that it has improved in almost all the indicators although it has not achieved the set targets. An evaluation from the unit managers led to a decision of reducing the fall rates to hit the set benchmark of zero rates. The selected initiative was standardizing intentional rounding and educating patients and families. The project is to be executed by an interprofessional team and they will be using the SBAR tool as their communication tool.
References
AHRQ (2019). Tool 3B: Scheduled Rounding Protocol | Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality. [online] Ahrq.gov. Available at: https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/systems/hospital/fallpxtoolkit/fallpxtk-tool3b.html [Accessed 3 Oct. 2019].
Dixon-Woods, M., & Martin, G. P. (2016). Does quality improvement improve quality?. Future Hospital Journal, 3(3), 191-194.
Foronda, C., MacWilliams, B., & McArthur, E. (2016). Interprofessional communication in healthcare: An integrative review. Nurse education in practice, 19, 36-40.
Hicks, D. (2015). Can rounding reduce patient falls in acute care? An integrative literature review. Medsurg Nursing, 24(1), 51.
Jenko, M., Panjwani, Y., & Buck, H. G. (2019). Intentional Rounding With Certified Nursing Assistants in Long-Term Care: A Pilot Project. Journal of gerontological nursing, 45(6), 15-21.
Khalifa, M. (2019). Improving Patient Safety by Reducing Falls in Hospitals Among the Elderly: A Review of Successful Strategies. Studies in health technology and informatics, 262, 340-343.
Lasater, K., Cotrell, V., McKenzie, G., Simonson, W., Morgove, M. W., Long, E. E., & Eckstrom, E. (2016). Collaborative falls prevention: interprofessional team formation, implementation, and evaluation. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 47(12), 545-550.
Padgett, J., Gossett, K., Mayer, R., Chien, W. W., & Turner, F. (2017). Improving patient safety through high-reliability organizations. The Qualitative Report, 22(2), 410-425.
Reuben, D. B., Gazarian, P., Alexander, N., Araujo, K., Baker, D., Bean, J. F., & Leipzig, R. M. (2017). The STRIDE Intervention: Falls Risk Factor Assessment and Management, Patient Engagement, and Nurse Co-management. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 65(12), 2733.
Wasfy, J. H., Zigler, C. M., Choirat, C., Wang, Y., Dominici, F., & Yeh, R. W. (2017). Readmission rates after the passage of the hospital readmissions reduction program: a pre–post-analysis. Annals of internal medicine, 166(5), 324-331.
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 392 Week 4 Discussion Quality Improvement Data
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Important information for writing discussion questions and participation
Welcome to class
Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to
I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.
Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.
If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.
Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.
Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.
I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!
Hi Class,
Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.
Contact me if you have any questions.
Important information on Writing a Discussion Question
- Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
- There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
- Include in-text citations in your response
- Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
- Follow APA-7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor
- A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
- Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
- Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
- Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
- Follow APA 7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
- Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
- Here are some helpful links
- Student paper example
- Citing Sources
- The Writing Center is a great resource