Boost your Grades with us today!
Non-Communicable Diseases Research Poster
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: Non-Communicable Diseases Research Poster
Title: Non-Communicable Diseases Research Poster
Research Poster Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) not only lead the way with respect to mortality rates at a global level but also account for the majority of deaths in high-income countries. According to Bashir (2021), the most common causes of death in Saudi Arabia are ischemic heart disease, road injuries, stroke, chronic kidney disease, lower respiratory tract infections, Alzheimer’s disease, conflict and terror, cirrhosis, neonatal disorders, and diabetes mellitus. Select one of the causes of death listed above, then assemble a research poster specific to your selected topic and how it progressed to a goal in Saudi Vision 2030. Approach the topic as if you are gathering sources to present this research at a conference. Be sure your references address: • • • • • • • How is your selected cause of death addressed by Saudi Vision 2030? What are some of the methods in obtaining research and data for shaping KSA policy regarding your selected cause of death? Any challenges to collecting evidence-based information. Health policy laws implementing positive social changes in this area of healthcare. What is the importance of this information? Why is your selected cause of death relevant to your audience or field of study? How is it applicable beyond these contexts? Reference: Bashar, S. (2021). Leading cause of death in comparison to COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 25, 2468-2469. https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2468-2469.pdf. This Research Poster should meet the following criteria: • • • • Include sections for: Introduction, Literature Review, Methods, Results, and Conclusion. Include a title slide and references slide. Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from a minimum of three scholarly articles. Be formatted according to APA 7th edition. How Vision 2030 Progressed from Agenda to Policy concerning Tobacco and Vaping Use Student’s First Name, Middle Initial(s), Last Name Institutional Affiliation Course Number and Name Instructor’s Name and Title Assignment Due Date Introduction Tobacco consumption is a major risk factor for morbidity as well as mortality. The tobacco industry has had steady market revenue since 2019, making its use difficult to control. Methods To evaluate the actual consumption status of the people in the KSA, a survey was conducted by us on around 10735 people ranging 15 years and above; this includes male individuals of 5253 and female individuals of 5482. The survey was executed in April and June of 2013 (Sabbagh et al., 2020). The interview survey of Saudi Health was executed with multistage sampling, which covered the major representation of the country. The data collected through the survey was mainly based on face-to-face interaction interviews (Itumalla & Aldhmadi, 2020). Results Al Nohair, S. F. (2017) The number of people smoking conventional cigarettes and e-cigarettes has increased drastically. The prevalence of vaping among health science students in Saudi was 27.7 percent compared to 14.1 percent smoking conventional cigarettes. The overall prevalence of current smoking was 12.2 percent, considering these males were potentially higher side to smoke more than females (21.5 percent vs. 1.1 percent) (Itumalla & Aldhmadi, 2020). Moradi-Lakeh et al. (2015). The average age of the smoking beginning period was around 19.1 years (plus-minus 6.5 years); this includes the beginners (smokers) with a percentage of 8.9% under the age of 15 years. The daily consumption of shisha tobacco smoking was recorded as 4.3 percent of the total population; this includes 7.3 percent males and 1.3 percent of female smokers (Itumalla & Aldhmadi, 2020). (Arab News, 2013) This has prompted the government to include the concern in the Vision 2030 program. Saudi Arabia’s vision 2030 of combating tobacco and vaping has progressed from a mere agenda to policy such as value-added tax on tobacco, antismoking campaigns, antismoking clinics, mobile apps and other initiatives. Literature Review Initial Saudi’s Vision 2030 Agendas on Tobacco Use Moradi-Lakeh et al. (2015). The country initially presented series of agendas for its vision 2030 aimed at reducing the use of this product. Saudi also had in its Vision 2030 the agenda of becoming a signatory of the WHO Of those, 25.3 percent were successful by the time of the survey. Around 23.3 Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) to give it the power to initiate its anti- percent of the whole population, 32.3 percent of males, and 13.5 percent of females smoking campaign (Itumalla & Aldhmadi, 2020). were exposed to secondhand smoke for at least one day during the past 7 days at home, Transitions of the vision 2030’s Agendas to Policies. As the country approaches 2030, most of work, or school (Sabbagh et al., 2020). the above agendas have progressed to Policies aimed at reducing tobacco and vaping use (Saudi Conclusion Ministry of Health, 2019). Saudi Arabia government initiated a policy banning the advertisement of Based on the study, there is a high prevalence of tobacco and vamping rate in tobacco products. An anti-smoking policy was also implemented in 2015 to reduce the use of vaping Saudia Arabia (Tobaiqy et al., 2020). The outcomes of the KSA policies regarding the (Saudi Ministry of Health, 2019). use of tobacco in Saudia depend on the method used for obtaining data (Sabbagh et al., 2020). The information collected will be critical in meeting the 2030 strategic plan in reducing tobacco use in Saudia Arabia. The implementation of the plan package will be applicable beyond these contexts, as it will reduce the demand for tobacco (Sabbagh et al., 2020). References Al Nohair, S. F. (2017). Epidemiology of cigarette smoking among adolescent male students in Qassim, Saudi Arabia. Public Health Research, 7(5), 119-122. (Emerald Insight, 2020) http://article.sapub.org/10.5923.j.phr.20170705.03.html How tobacco and vaping concerns are indicated in Vision 2030. Saudi Arabia’s vision 2030 has Itumalla, R., & Aldhmadi, B. (2020). Combating tobacco use in Saudi Arabia: a review taken into consideration the tobacco and vaping concerns. Saudi Arabia has an ambitious strategic of recent tobacco control plan to reduce smoking rates from 12.7 percent to 5 percent by 2030. Some of the initiatives. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journl,6(7), 858-863. strategic plans include implementation of the plan package to reduce the attractiveness of tobacco https://applications.emro.who.int/emhj/v26/07/1020-3397-2020-2607-858-863products, as well restricts the use of tobacco packaging in the form of tobacco advertising and eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1 promotion (Tobaiqy et al., 2020). Moradi-Lakeh, M., El Bcheraoui, C., Tuffaha, M., Daoud, F., Al Saeedi, M., Suitable Methods in Obtaining Research and Data for Shaping KSA Policy. The outcomes of Basulaiman, M., … & Mokdad, A. H. (2015). Tobacco consumption in the Kingdom of the KSA policies regarding the use of tobacco in Saudia depend on the method used for obtaining Saudi Arabia, 2013: findings from a national survey. BMC public health, 15(1), 1-10. data. A survey-based on face-to-face interviews will be critical in obtaining information on the use of https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-015-1902-3 tobacco in Saudia Arabia. Sabbagh, H. J., Khogeer, L. N., Hassan, M. H. A., & Allaf, H. K. (2020). Parental Challenges to Collecting Evidence-Based Information. The collection of evidence-based knowledge and attitude regarding e-cigarette use in Saudi Arabia and the effect of practices is likely to face challenges associated with a lack of quality assurance processes to a certain parental smoking: A cross-sectional study. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, quality of information collected. Some evidence-based information is complex and would require 13, 1195. advanced software to collect (Tobaiqy et al., 2020). Saudi Ministry of Health. (2019). Saudi Ministry of Health Raising Efforts on Tobacco Health Policy Laws Implementing Positive Social Changes in This Area of Healthcare. The Control. PR Newswire, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/saudi-ministry-of2016 health policy prohibiting smoking in public places resulted in positive social changes in this area health-raising-efforts-on-tobacco-control-300942181.html of healthcare (Tobaiqy et al., 2020). The policy reduced tobacco use by 12.4%. Besides, it also Tobaiqy, M., Thomas, D., MacLure, A., & MacLure, K. (2020). Smokers’ and Nonprotected non-tobacco users from adverse effects of tobacco (Tobaiqy et al., 2020). Smokers’ Attitudes towards Smoking Cessation in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review. The Importance of This Information. The information provided in the research will inform the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public health, 17(21), 8194. KSA policer makers on the right policies to implement in combating tobacco use by 2030. The https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218194. information collected will be critical in meeting the 2030 strategic plan in reducing tobacco use in Arab News. (2013). 10 Million Saudi Smokers by 2020, Jeddah: Arab News, Saudia Arabia (Sabbagh et al., 2020). https://www.arabnews.com/news/453724 The Relevance of the Research Topic to the Audience. The research topic is relevant to tobacco Emerald Insight. ( 2020). An overview of tobacco control interventions in the Global users as it provides them with information on the various policies aimed at protecting them from South. Drugs and Alcohol Today, smoking. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/DAT-03-2020-0013/full/html The Applicability of the Study Beyond These Contexts. The implementation of the plan package will be applicable beyond these contexts, as it will reduce the demand for tobacco. The findings of the study may also be used by a non-governmental organization in its fight against tobacco and vaping RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2019 www.PosterPresentations.com
Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
Main Postinga | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
|
Main Post: Timeliness | 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3. |
|
First Response | 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
Second Response | 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
Participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
|
Total Points: 100 | |||||