NHS-FP4000 Assessment 3: Analysis of a current problem in health care

Sample Answer for NHS-FP4000 Assessment 3: Analysis of a current problem in health care Included After Question

Write a 4-6 page analysis of a current problem or issue in
health care, including a proposed solution and possible ethical implications.

For this assessment, you will analyze a current health care
problem or issue. Read each portion of the assessment carefully and use the
Suggested Resources to help you complete the assessment. This assessment
provides an opportunity to apply critical thinking and problem-solving skills
to a current health care problem or issue.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NHS-FP4000 Assessment 3: Analysis of a current problem in health care

Title: NHS-FP4000 Assessment 3: Analysis of a current problem in health care

Critical Thinking – A Problem-Solving Approach

Critical thinking is a key skill you will need to master in
both your academic and professional lives. Being able to identify a problem,
analyze that problem or issue from multiple perspectives, identify and evaluate
solutions to the problem, and then convince others of the value of your
decision requires logical thinking, the ability to identify and synthesize
credible supporting evidence, and the ability to communicate your thinking
clearly and professionally in writing and speaking.

For this assessment, you will analyze a current health care
problem or issue of interest to you, the same topic you previously used to
complete Assessment 2. The assessment requires critical thinking. Review the
critical thinking information in the Building Skills for Critical Thinking
resources. To explore your chosen topic, you should use the first two steps of
the Socratic Problem-Solving Approach, as described on Campus, to aid your
critical thinking.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NHS-FP4000 Assessment 3: Analysis of a current problem in health care

Evidence-Based Practices

In health care, research is important. It helps you see what
has worked and what has not worked effectively for wellness and patient care.
It is important for you to explore research about evidenced-based practices in
your areas of interest. This research will help you develop and demonstrate a
professional health care perspective and expand your organizational, critical
thinking, and problem-solving skills.

As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to
think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your
viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them
with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, a family member,
or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for
your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or
submitted as part of your assessment.

How do you approach a situation within your organization and
apply critical thinking skills?

How often have you needed to find credible information to
solve a personal or professional problem? How did you find the information you
needed?

How can you explore the government and private organizations
that track and report health care research about evidence-based practices in
your areas of interest?

How can you communicate multiple perspectives of a problem
in a way that is understood by others?

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the
grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each
point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level
descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

Describe the health care problem or issue you selected for
use in Assessment 2 and provide details about it.

Identify possible causes for the problem or issue.

Use scholarly information to explain the health care problem
or issue.

Identify at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed
journal articles about the topic.

You may use articles you found while working on Assessment 2
or you may search the Capella Library for other articles.

You may find the applicable Undergraduate Library Research
Guide helpful in your search.

Assess the credibility of the information sources.

Assess the relevance of the information sources.

Analyze the problem or issue.

Describe the setting or context for the problems or issues.

Describe why the problem or issue is important to you.

Identify groups of people affected by the problem or issue.

Discuss potential solutions for the problem or issue.

Compare your opinion with other opinions you find in sources
from the Capella Library.

Provide the pros and cons for one of the solutions you are
proposing.

Analyze the ethical implications if the potential solution
(the one for which you provide pros and cons) were to be implemented.

Discuss the pros and cons of implementing the proposed
solution from an ethical principle point of view.

Provide examples from the literature to support the points
you are making.

Describe what would be necessary to implement the proposed
solution.

Example Assessment: You may use the assessment example,
linked in the Assessment Example section of the Resources, to give you an idea
of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.

Additional Requirements

Length: At least 4–6 typed, double-spaced pages, not
including the title page and reference page.

Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

APA Template: Use the APA Style Paper Template as the paper
format and the APA Style Paper Tutorial for guidance. See the Resources for
these documents.

Written communication: Write clearly and logically, with
correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.

Using outside sources: Integrate information from outside
sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and
summarizing, following APA style.

References: Integrate information from outside sources to
include at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles and
three in-text citations within the paper.

APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text
citations of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the
reference page.

Turnitin: Submit your assessment to Turnitin prior to
grading. Then, only submit your final assessment to faculty for grading.

Organize your paper using the following structure and
headings:

Title page. A separate page.

Introduction. A brief one-paragraph statement about the
purpose of the paper.

Elements of the problem/issue. Identify the elements of the
problem or issue, or question.

Analysis. Analyze, define, and frame the problem or issue.

Considering options. Consider solutions, responses, or
answers.

Solution. Choose a solution, response, or answer.

Implementation. Implementation of the potential solution.

Conclusion. One paragraph.

Note: Read the Analyze a Current Health Care Problem or
Issue Scoring Guide to fully understand how your paper will be graded.

Submit the paper for evaluation by clicking on the
assessment title and uploading the paper as a Word document.

If you would like assistance in organizing your assessment,
or if you simply have a question about your assessment, please do not hesitate
to ask your courseroom instructor or the teaching assistants in the NHS Learner
Success Lab for guidance and suggestions.

NHS-FP4000 Assessment 3 Analysis of a current problem in health care Grading Rubric

Performance Category	100% or highest level of performance 100% 16 points	Very good or high level of performance 88% 14 points	Acceptable level of performance 81% 13 points	Inadequate demonstration of expectations 68% 11 points	Deficient level of performance 56% 9 points	Failing level of performance 55% or less 0 points
Total Points Possible= 50	16 Points	14 Points	13 Points	11 Points	9 Points	0 Points
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
	16 Points	14 Points	13 Points	11 Points	9 Points	0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
	10 Points	9 Points			6 Points	0 Points
Interactive Dialogue Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.	Demonstrated all of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.	Demonstrated 3 of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.			Demonstrated 2 of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.	Demonstrated 1 or less of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
	8 Points	7 Points	6 Points	5 Points	4 Points	0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.	The following was present: 0-3 errors in APA format AND Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.	The following was present: 4-6 errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.	The following was present: 7-9 errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.	The following was present: 10- 12 errors in APA format AND/OR Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.	The following was present: 13 – 15 errors in APA format AND/OR Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand. AND/OR The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.	The following was present: 16 to greater errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. AND/OR Writing style does not facilitate communication
	0 Points Deducted					5 Points Lost
Participation Requirements	Demonstrated the following: Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days					Failed to demonstrate the following: Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
	0 Points Lost					5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements	Demonstrated all of the following: The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.					Demonstrates one or less of the following. The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.