Boost your Grades with us today!
Sample Answer for NHS 8040 Assignment: Interview and Leadership Analysis Included After Question
NHS 8040 Assignment Interview and Leadership Analysis
Overview
While it is still early in your doctoral education process, it is important to start thinking about where you might complete your doctoral capstone project and who could be your preceptor. This assignment provides an opportunity for you to evaluate a potential leader to serve as preceptor at your proposed capstone site. Your interviewee should be in a health care leadership position with a graduate degree in a health care-related field. Ideally he or she should have a doctorate, but a master’s degree is acceptable.
This assignment has two parts:
Interview a health care leader who could serve as your preceptor for your capstone.
Summarize the interview in a 3–5 page paper.
With guidance from the health care leader you interview, determine a gap, need, or opportunity that will serve as the basis for the remaining assignments in this course. It should align with a strategic priority of the organization or health care system.
Keep in mind this could also serve as a capstone topic. Explore the feasibility and fidelity of this with the leader, including alignment with the capstone process and timeline.
Instructions
The following corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each listed point. Consider reviewing the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
Evaluate the primary leadership style of a chosen leader in a health care management position.
What are the leader’s credentials and what is his or her formal position in the organization?
What role does the leader play in the organization, system, or public health arena?
Is he or she a mentor to others?
How visible is the leader outside the organization?
How would you characterize his or her leadership style?
What is his or her role in communication?
Is he or she viewed as a change agent?
Assess a leader’s organizational role as it relates to quality, safety, and evidence-based standards.
How is the leader’s role interdisciplinary?
What is one example of how this leader facilitates, participates, or fosters interprofessional or interdisciplinary collaboration?
What is an example of how this leader champions quality and safety in the organization or public health system?
Explain the rationale behind the selection of a leader to serve as a preceptor.
Describe why this leader is qualified to be a doctoral preceptor.
Is this person trusted and respected in the organization and community?
Identify the connections he or she has to formal and informal power and how might these be leveraged to assist you in a quality improvement project or evidence-based practice change.
For example, could you get help with navigating policy, recruiting team members, enlisting buy-in?
Identify a gap, problem, or opportunity for a capstone project.
Can this be connected to an organizational, systemic, or public health strategic priority?
What are the implications for patient outcomes and safety?
In the context of the health care system identified, how will you include the voice of the patient?
Summarize a leader’s ability to provide ethical stewardship and oversight when accessing sensitive organizational information.
What is within the leader’s capacity to protect?
What challenges has the leader encountered with regard to the ethical use of the organization’s private data?
How does a leader provide oversight with communications related to organizational information?
Write coherently to support a central idea, using correct grammar, mechanics, and APA formatting.
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NHS 8040 Assignment: Interview and Leadership Analysis
Title: NHS 8040 Assignment: Interview and Leadership Analysis
NHS 8040 Assignment Interview and Leadership Analysis Grading Rubric
Performance Category | 100% or highest level of performance
100% 16 points |
Very good or high level of performance
88% 14 points |
Acceptable level of performance
81% 13 points |
Inadequate demonstration of expectations
68% 11 points |
Deficient level of performance
56% 9 points
|
Failing level
of performance 55% or less 0 points |
Total Points Possible= 50 | 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points |
Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics. |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements
|
16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points | |
Application of Course Knowledge
Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements
|
10 Points | 9 Points | 6 Points | 0 Points | |||
Interactive Dialogue
Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic. |
Demonstrated all of the following:
|
Demonstrated 3 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 2 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:
|
||
8 Points | 7 Points | 6 Points | 5 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
Grammar, Syntax, APA
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error. |
The following was present:
AND
AND
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
0 Points Deducted | 5 Points Lost | |||||
Participation
Requirements |
Demonstrated the following:
|
Failed to demonstrate the following:
|
||||
0 Points Lost | 5 Points Lost | |||||
Due Date Requirements | Demonstrated all of the following:
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Demonstrates one or less of the following.
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |